[Yann Forget 2006-01-10]
> Setting up libdiscover1 (1.7.17) ...
> ldconfig: Cannot lstat /usr/lib/libdiscover.so.1.0.0: No such file or
> directory
> ldconfig: Cannot lstat /usr/lib/libdiscover.so.1.0.0: No such file or
> directory
>
> Which is quite normal as the file is at /lib/libdiscover.so
discover1_1.7.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.7.20.dsc
discover1_1.7.20.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.20_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.7.20_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.7.20_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.7.20_i386.deb
discover1-udeb_1.7.20_i386.udeb
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.7.20_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.7.20_i386.udeb
discover1_1.7.20.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.20.dsc
discover1_1.7.20.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.20.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.20_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392314: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344645: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386679: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359649: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415620: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359333: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383864: fixed in discover1 1.7.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Friday 23 March 2007 08:33, Sander Marechal wrote:
> > When you get to partitioning, choose "manual" partitioning. The next
> > dialog (the partitioners main screen) should show at the top the
> > options "configure RAID" and "configure LVM". Select those and you
> > will be asked if you want to
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 March 2007 08:33, Sander Marechal wrote:
> From the output you show it looks like your current partitions do not have
> type "linux raid" (fd) and possibly also not "linux lvm" (df) set.
> The partitioner relies on that to recognize existing raid and lvm
> partitio
We told you watch NNYR Yesterday
+25% in 1 day
It.s only just begun
Northamerican Energy Group Corp.
Symbol : NNYR
5 day Expected : $0.50 ( 500% profit )
Get in tomorrow or get left out!!
This is going to double in next 2 days
Real Comp with Real Products
Get in tomorrow or be left out!!
came t
On Friday 23 March 2007 12:44, Sander Marechal wrote:
> Also, cjwatson mentioned that marking the original PV partitions for
> use as LVM PV, then using the "manage LVM" option that appears and
> writing the new partition tables should work, but I don't have the guts
> to try that out on my server.
On Friday 23 March 2007 11:50, Colin Watson wrote:
> Log:
> * Restore previous default priority when selecting a menu item
> immediately after backing up to the main menu.
Im not sure that this change is a good idea. Having the priority lowered
after exiting to the menu can be very useful.
For e
clock-setup_0.15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
clock-setup_0.15.dsc
clock-setup_0.15.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.15_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Accepted:
clock-setup_0.15.dsc
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.15.dsc
clock-setup_0.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.15.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.15_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.15_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
clock-setup_0.15.d
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415871: fixed in clock-setup 0.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi Greetings for the Debian installer-team,
I tried to use the 17th March cd-iso rc2, only the first one.
0. it lasted 3 - 5 times before booting started
1. boot from cd-rom: non emulation booting appeared
2. next was: Isolinux... Peter Anvin
3. next was: picture not to recognize, only to read
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 March 2007 11:50, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Log:
>> * Restore previous default priority when selecting a menu item
>> immediately after backing up to the main menu.
>
> Im not sure that this change is a good idea. Having the priority lowered
> after exiting to the men
On Friday 23 March 2007 15:09, Sander Marechal wrote:
> It's also very annoying for people who have no idea how to answer the
> expert questions (a.k.a. me). For example, during the install I had to
> back out of the partitioner, rescan the hard drives and start the
> partitioner again (see install
Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's also very annoying for people who have no idea how to answer the
> expert questions (a.k.a. me). For example, during the install I had to
> back out of the partitioner, rescan the hard drives and start the
> partitioner again (see install report #
On Friday 23 March 2007 14:27, Allard Hoeve wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The network cards on these servers are detected in reverse order. A fix
> is in 2.6.19 (pci=bfsort), but for etch we shall have to edit the udev
> naming persistance rules in order to have NIC1 = eth0, NIC2 = eth1 like
> othe
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:36:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:15:51AM -0500, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>
> > I'm proposing an idea for the GSoC about Improving the Debian Installer
> > Usability[1]. I know the d-i is very good technically, but it must be
> > more
Frans Pop wrote:
> That is just not true. The question of grub paths will _only_ be asked if
> you select "do not install in the MBR of the first disk".
Bug in the installer perhaps? I was asked the grub install location, but
not the password question after doing the procedure I explained in my
i
On Friday 23 March 2007 15:15, Frans Pop wrote:
> That is just not true. The question of grub paths will _only_ be asked
> if you select "do not install in the MBR of the first disk".
Slight correction after checking the code: Grub can also jump to
the "devices" question if another *unsupported*
The network cards on these servers are detected in reverse order. A fix
is in 2.6.19 (pci=bfsort), but for etch we shall have to edit the udev
naming persistance rules in order to have NIC1 = eth0, NIC2 = eth1 like
other generations of PowerEdges.
Please define "reverse order", reverse in re
On Friday 23 March 2007 15:53, Allard Hoeve wrote:
> > Note: the report was never accepted as an installation report because
> > of the "Subject:" line. IMO there is no real need to file it as there
> > were no issues.
>
> Ah. Well. It never said so anywhere, just: please report :)
No, you misunde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It's also very annoying for people who have no idea how to answer the
>> expert questions (a.k.a. me). For example, during the install I had to
>> back out of the partitioner, r
Frans Pop wrote:
> Slight correction after checking the code: Grub can also jump to
> the "devices" question if another *unsupported* operating system was
> detected by os-prober. However, that is independent of the priority
> level.
Does Debian/etch-xen fall under that? That's what was already
(No need to CC me; I'm subscribed to the list; as you may have noticed I
no longer CCed you after it became obvious that you were subscribed.)
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:22, Sander Marechal wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Slight correction after checking the code: Grub can also jump to
> > the "dev
Frans Pop wrote:
> (No need to CC me; I'm subscribed to the list; as you may have noticed I
> no longer CCed you after it became obvious that you were subscribed.)
>
> On Friday 23 March 2007 16:22, Sander Marechal wrote:
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> Slight correction after checking the code: Grub can
On Friday 23 March 2007 17:39, Sander Marechal wrote:
> I'll give it a try later on. I have to check if the LVM issue uis
> solved with today's daily build anyway.
It can't have because there have not yet been any changes in the installer
since RC2...
> What's the exact command? Just "os-prober"
Op 23-03-2007 om 09:34 schreef Santiago Ruano Rincón:
> I also used to think that usability was for not-"intelligent" and lazy people,
> but my pre-degree thesis project [3] made change my mind. I worked with
> a Colombian indigenous group, faw away from the city, they are using
> computers and I'd
Op 23-03-2007 om 17:19 schreef Eddy Petri??or:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Perhaps there should be an option in the menu that you see after backing
> >> out of something that toggles expert mode on/off?
> >
> > I like the idea to be asked if y
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinstall + kde-cd-1
Image version: Etch RC2 i386 netinst + kde-cd-1
Date: 23-Mar-2007 19:00
Machine: Medion 8818
Processor: Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Duo E6300 @ 1,86Ghz
Memory: 1,00Go RAM
Partitions: 200Go NTFS / 100Go ext3 / 10Go swap / 10Go FAT32
Bas
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O
Package: installation-reports
Version: i386 20070317
I've tried to boot from floppy, but boot stopped on "Loading initrd.gz"
Boot floppy from Sarge works well, but I cannot install Etch with this
floppy... And I have no Sarge CDs now, it tells about different
kernels on CD and on boot floppy.
Op 23-03-2007 om 19:41 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> Install base system : Debootstrap Warning : [...]/packages.gz was corrupt
>
> I tried debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso, debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso,
> debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso but the installation has never
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:03:14PM +0300, Ilya A. Naydov wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: i386 20070317
is it the RC2 floppy image ?
>
> I've tried to boot from floppy, but boot stopped on "Loading initrd.gz"
can you try with another floppy disk
> Boot floppy from Sarge wor
FYI: The status of the partman-partitioning source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 47
Current version: 48
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
THE FESTIVAL RAG >> 2003-2006
03.23.2007
A note from Dave Roberts, former Managing Editor.
To the glorious readers of the colossally defunct Festival RAG:
Dave Roberts, here.
Yeah, thee Dave Roberts.
Many of you have written asking about the film American Cannibal
(http://www.american-canni
Package: boot-floppy
Version: i386 20070317
I've tried to boot from floppy, but boot stopped on "Loading initrd.gz"
Boot floppy from Sarge works well, but I cannot install Etch with this
floppy... And I have no Sarge CDs now, it tells about different
kernels on CD and on boot floppy...
I've n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 415991 installation-reports
Bug#415991: Boot floppy fails to load initrd.gz (Etch)
Warning: Unknown package 'boot-floppy'
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppy' to `installation-reports'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hello,
I can report that Etch RC2 is doing very well on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60s
I have used installgui -very nice- :-)
And LVM doing also fine.
Only wireless networking needs non-free firmware ipw3945, also tested fine.
Regards,
Hector Oron
2007/3/20, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:42:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415991: Boot floppy fails to load initrd.gz (Etch)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Saturday 24 March 2007 01:57, Hector Oron wrote:
> I can report that Etch RC2 is doing very well on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60s
> I have used installgui -very nice- :-)
> And LVM doing also fine.
>
> Only wireless networking needs non-free firmware ipw3945, also tested
> fine.
Thanks for following u
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:43:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #345276
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
48 matches
Mail list logo
