Package: installation-reports
Boot method: From CD (net installer, multiarch version)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/4.0_r0/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-40r0-alpha-hppa-ia64-NETINST-1.iso
Date: around 17h00 GMT, on April 16, 2007
Machine: Asus Z63A laptop (which is a custo
Stephen Frazier wrote:
It would appear that Michael Peek works in an environment like mine.
Both windows and Debian machines on the same network. The DHCP server
belongs to the windows support people and they don't know how to set
it up for both windows and Debian.
Bingo!
What I have done is
Writing in /proc will not persist reboot, so the bug may well hit the
user after installation again, for any network activity.
Taking the suggested values, here should be the "fix" for the installed
system to be able to do TCP networking:
# cat <> /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 65536 6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> package tasksel tasksel-data
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tasksel tasksel-data
> tags 418816 + pending
Bug#418816: tasksel does not show Laptop task as installed even though it is
On Monday 16 April 2007 19:46, Markus Knapp wrote:
> Apr 14 13:25:00 base-installer: Err http://ftp.se.debian.org etch
> Release.gpg
> Apr 14 13:25:00 base-installer: Could not create a socket for
> 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 (f=10 t=1 p=6) - socket (97 Address family not
> supported by protocol) [IP: 20
FYI: The status of the discover1 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.7.19
Current version: 1.7.20
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
> Of course, while this is the correct default behavior, it seems reasonable
> to me that we should allow users to override it with preseeding
> or the like,
> so that's IMHO a valid wishlist request.
a related issue is if you have a cd not loaded through the CD mechanism for
whatever reason and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> package iso-scan load-iso
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: iso-scan load-iso
> tags 419141 + pending
Bug#419141: iso-scan: Allow multiple architecture iso images
There were no tags set
Geert Stappers wrote:
> I do miss Joey Hess.
>
> His cool design of the debian-installer is still with us,
> but it is his coolness before conflicts arise that I mis.
My coolness in conflicts is largely due to immediatly ignoring threads
that contain language such as "you don't read very well, Fr
If the full CD images directory doesn't always contain the MD5SUMS for the netstat and businesscard
images, then the page needs to have a link to the directory that does contain them. The links for
the netstat and businesscard points to the iso files and there is no easy way to get to directory
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 22:29]:
> Looks like an essential GPG key is missing in that image. The people
> who built this image will have to look into that.
>
> Martin, can you pick up on this?
Hmm, someone else reported this but I don't quite understand why
people would see thi
It would appear that Michael Peek works in an environment like mine. Both windows and Debian
machines on the same network. The DHCP server belongs to the windows support people and they don't
know how to set it up for both windows and Debian. What I have done is to create a floppy with a lot
of
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-mod
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.23_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.23.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.23.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.23_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6
On Monday 16 April 2007 22:11, Markus Knapp wrote:
> Tried that but still the same problem.
No, different problem.
> I'll add the complete syslog, perhaps someone knows what's going wrong.
> Apr 16 21:20:07 net-retriever: gpgv:
> Apr 16 21:20:07 net-retriever: Signature made Sun Apr 8 09:38:40
>
You can easily put all the answers for the questions asked after the partitioning in a preseed
file. Then no operator intervention is required after you set up the partitions until it reboots
into the new system. On some machines you may have to remove the CD before the reboot.
Michael Gilbert
On Monday 16 April 2007 20:56, Markus Knapp wrote:
> Sounds good. But is there any list around where I can see what
> mirrors only support IPv4? Preferable european mirrors.
> Or do I have to try and error? One install run takes about half an
> hour so that wouldn't be a good option.
Most don't. U
Am 16.04.2007 um 20:43 schrieb Frans Pop:
On Monday 16 April 2007 19:46, Markus Knapp wrote:
Last week I got a new NSLU2, took the new install-image from
http://www.slug-firmware.net/d-dls.php and tried to install.
Hardly everithing went good till the installation of the base system.
There I go
On Monday 16 April 2007 19:46, Markus Knapp wrote:
> Last week I got a new NSLU2, took the new install-image from
> http://www.slug-firmware.net/d-dls.php and tried to install.
> Hardly everithing went good till the installation of the base system.
> There I got the same error as mentioned here:
>
On 4/16/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2007 15:28, Joey Hess wrote:
> Testing is no longer etch, but lenny, so the default url downloaded
> when using a simple url has changed
> from http://hostname/d-i/etch/./preseed.cfg
> to http://hostname/d-i/lenny/./preseed.cfg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416543 + patch pending
Bug#416543: [newt] Last letter of the title is cut
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:56:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> reopen 419386
> reassign 419386 netcfg 1.37
> forcemerge 419386 410560
> thanks
>
> > In going through the log, I noted something else in choosing a
> > connection I was offered eth0 or eth1. eth0 is I think the firewire
> > connection a
Hi there!
Last week I got a new NSLU2, took the new install-image from
http://www.slug-firmware.net/d-dls.php and tried to install.
Hardly everithing went good till the installation of the base system.
There I got the same error as mentioned here:
initramfs-tools could not be installed.
Any n
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:47:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418760: preseed: Preseeding isn't working anymore in
Testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Thursday 12 April 2007 05:09, Paul Dexter wrote:
> Comments/Problems: Network interface does not work.
> My card is PCMCIA Xircom Re-100, driven by the
> xirc2ps_cs module.
It is not clear to me if this is a network configuration problem or a
driver problem.
Please try the following so we ge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 419386 Does not set NIC with link as default
Bug#419386: installation-report: Installation issues
Changed Bug title to Does not set NIC with link as default from
installation-report: Installation issues.
>
End of message, stopping processing h
reopen 419386
reassign 419386 netcfg 1.37
forcemerge 419386 410560
thanks
> In going through the log, I noted something else in choosing a
> connection I was offered eth0 or eth1. eth0 is I think the firewire
> connection and was the default
That has been reported before, but should not happen ac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 419386
Bug#419386: installation-report: Installation issues
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 419386 netcfg 1.37
Bug#419386: installation-report: Installation issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
Op 16-04-2007 om 13:36 schreef Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:32:03 +0200
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line Bug#418043: acpi=off versus noapic bootparam
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
> From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL
Op 15-04-2007 om 23:26 schreef josh:
> pretty pathetic. I think you owe me an apology...
Josh,
My advice is to do good things,
while you wait for something that might come some day.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
Live is what happens, when you are making plans. --John Lennon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Frans Pop schrieb:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 18:25, Bernhard wrote:
>> Comments/Problems
>> GRUB Bootloader installation fails.
>> I used LILO instead.
>
> If you used a daily built image, this was almost certainly due to a script
> error that has now been fixed. Therefore closing your report.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419141 - patch
Bug#419141: iso-scan: Allow multiple architecture iso images
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Here is the patch in the format you requested.
Yeah, I know it is specific to these two architectures, but it does not
break anything (i.e. it will work for the other architectures if there
is only one ISO image on the key) and at least it works for those two.
Perhaps it could be generalized
tags 419141 - patch
thanks
On Friday 13 April 2007 23:55, Harry Edmon wrote:
> The following patch would allow you have have both the i386 and amd64
> ISO images on a USB key, and the correct one would be mounted based on
> whether you booted a 32 or 64 bit kernel.
Please provide patched in unifi
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:36:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419417: Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419535 installation-guide
Bug#419535: E-Mail vs. E-Mails
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package 'gnu'
Warning: Unknown package 'installation'
Warning: Unknown package 'guide'
Bug reassigned from package `debian gnu/linux ins
Package: Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide
Version: 4.0 for i386
The heading for section 8.5.2 reads "Sending E-Mails Outside The System".
This is incorrect English, with regard to e-mail. "e-mail" (whether
hyphenated, or not) is both singular *and* plural. Thus, I can write "I sent
email t
On Sunday 15 April 2007 14:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> 1/ during the installation, (I asked for as much information as
> possible), the installer kept asking if I wanted to abort the
> installation rather than selecting the next line on the installation
> menu. This started
On Sunday 15 April 2007 00:14, Shane Wegner wrote:
> So abiname is preserved in the kernel. I modified the
> installer to use the kernel and ran make
> build_cdrom_isolinux and dropped the initrd.gz and vmlinuz
> onto the netinst CD. Dropped all the udebs in as well as
> the debs for linux-image
On Monday 16 April 2007 15:49, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc R300 AD
> [Radeon 9500 Pro] [1002:4144]
> 02:00.1 Display controller [0380]: ATI Technologies Inc R300 AD [Radeon
> 9500 Pro] (Secondary) [1002:4164]
>
> > Which would be the corr
Am Montag, den 16.04.2007, 15:24 +0200 schrieb Frans Pop:
> We need the output of 'lspci -nn' for the video controller for this. Can
> you provide that please?
Sure!
$ lspci -nn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different
version?) [10de:01e0] (rev a2)
00:00.1 RAM memor
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:32:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418043: acpi=off versus noapic bootparam
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419537 discover-data
Bug#419537: Video hardware (ATI Radeon 9500 Pro) not recognized during
installation
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover-data'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 419537 discover-data
thanks
On Monday 16 April 2007 14:55, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> My video hardware has not been detected properly and I found my xorg
> configured to use the 'vesafb' driver instead of 'ati' or 'radeon'.
We need the output of 'lspci -nn' for the video controller for t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:12:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ad acta
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
reopen 418043
retitle 418043 acpi=off versus noapic bootparam
tags 418043 +moreinfo
thanks bug tracking system
Hi Geert,
thanks for your friendly reply.
I restarted the installation to collect the data you requested on the
acpi bootparam stuff. I had a mistake in my notes from the installation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 418043
Bug#418043: acpi=off versus noacpi bootparam
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 418043 acpi=off versus noapic bootparam
Bug#418043: acpi=off versus noacpi bootparam
Changed Bug title to acpi=off versus noapic bootparam from a
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst
Machine: Targa Desktop 02/2003
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Memory: 758M
Hi!
Sorry, this will be no detailed installation-report, because apart from
this minor issue everything went smooth. But:
My video hardware has not been detected pr
Chris Bell wrote:
On Mon 16 Apr, Michael S Peek wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
The Etch version has "Auto mode"
See http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc/apbs02.html.en#preseed-auto
for the details.
That's very slick, and it may indeed solve my problem, but I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> For those users there is "preseeding".
>>
>> See the preseeding section in the manual for details.
>
> ok, so if that's the case, why can't the prompts be upfront and store
> the user choic
On Monday 16 April 2007 06:45, Christian Perrier wrote:
> This is maybe time for a wiki page to keep track of this "memory
> reduction" issuewith hopefully someone feeling responsible enough
> and skilled enough to keep track of all actions that have to happen to
> achieve this goal.
And we al
51 matches
Mail list logo
