On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:09:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I think this is a weak argument, FWIW, considering how many countries
have multiple timezones and so ask the timezone question with not much
in the way of apparent ill effects. But: Michael, would an expert-mode
question satisfy you?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:56:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Regarding adding a UTC choice to the time zone selection question (as
> opposed to the location question, which is logically distinct from such
> things):
>
> If people agree that adding UTC has a good case, I would argue
> against it t
On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jerry Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier wrote:
The log doesn't show anything weird at all as far as I can see.
When exactly were there floppy probes occurring?
I was looking at lines like this and I assumed they were
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> severity 443131 normal
Bug#443131: partman-auto-lvm: lvm2 package installation
Severity set to `normal' from `minor'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Severity: minor
While the partman-auto-lvm worked just fine for me, the completed installation
was broken a
couple of different ways.
1. The mount point I set up for it did not make it into /etc/fstab. No error
shown in the gui.
The mount point I made in the instal
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For your information:
> I had also a hard time reading that patches will be accepted for this B.R.
They'll if they do not complicate normal user installation. Otherwise
it'll be a regression for those users (and they are the majority of
our users).
-
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
>> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testi
>> >ng-i386-DVD-1.iso
>>
>> Please don't use these images, we are not currently making weekly builds
>> of the ins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Op 18-09-2007 om 13:54 schreef Michael Stone:
> # > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:44:40PM +0200, you wrote:
> # >> Up to now, the answer you got is that most of us don't feel an urgent
> # >> need to work on this issue.
> # >
> # > The tone I read was th
# Op 18-09-2007 om 13:54 schreef Michael Stone:
# > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:44:40PM +0200, you wrote:
# >> Up to now, the answer you got is that most of us don't feel an urgent
# >> need to work on this issue.
# >
# > The tone I read was that such a change wouldn't be allowed in the interest
#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 442225 -1
Bug#442225: Triggers bogus anti-virus detection by Trend Micro OfficeScan 7.3
Bug 442225 cloned as bug 443121.
> reassign -1 nsis
Bug#443121: Triggers bogus anti-virus detection by Trend Micro OfficeScan 7.3
Bug reassigned from package
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Btw, should we reassign this to nsis?
It looks logical or, to avoid duplicated bugs, clone it and make the
new one blocks this.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN
Accepted:
live-installer_2.dsc
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_2.dsc
live-installer_2.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_2.tar.gz
live-installer_2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/live-installer/live-installer_2_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
live-instal
live-installer_2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-installer_2.dsc
live-installer_2.tar.gz
live-installer_2_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
- Forwarded message from panthere noire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Re: Bug#442939: installation-reports: Fails detect asus P5K SE
sata 2 and ide
From: panthere noire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 200
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:44:40PM +0200, you wrote:
Up to now, the answer you got is that most of us don't feel an urgent
need to work on this issue.
The tone I read was that such a change wouldn't be allowed in the
interest of user friendliness. If I misread that, I apologize.
Mike Stone
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Please don't use these images, we are not currently making weekly builds
> > of the installer DVDs. The image you tried was built last may, and is
>
> Shouldn't we then close this install report as it uses "unsupported"
> images?
I reassigned the installation report t
Quoting Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:37:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> While I agree with you Michael I also believe that majority of users
>> won't need this and who does is experienced enough to change the
>> system setting after the installation finishes
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:37:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>While I agree with you Michael I also believe that majority of users
>>won't need this and who does is experienced enough to change the
>>system setting after the installation finishes.
>
Holger Wansing wrote:
> > You don't need to; all these steps handle the case of there being no network
> > cleanly. Clock setup will let you choose your timezone, even if it can't
> > use ntp to synch the clock. Network configuration will still let you pick
> > a hostname for the machine, which is
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> While libglib2.0-udeb in unstable is currently broken due to a dependency
> problem, the version in testing is fine to work with.
>
> So in order to continue to work on other aspects of d-i, I implemented
> support for apt_preferences(5) in the b
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:37:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
While I agree with you Michael I also believe that majority of users
won't need this and who does is experienced enough to change the
system setting after the installation finishes.
I can't believe that debian is turning into a sy
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:48:54AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>>And I bet we can find dozens of such examples where not using the
>>local time is pretty much as bad as using the same time everywhere.
>
> Great...but I thought debian was about lettin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> Op 18-09-2007 om 15:53 schreef Holger Levsen:
>> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
>> > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso
>> >
>> > Please don't use these images, we are not c
Hi!
While libglib2.0-udeb in unstable is currently broken due to a dependency
problem, the version in testing is fine to work with.
So in order to continue to work on other aspects of d-i, I implemented
support for apt_preferences(5) in the build system. It was fairly easy
and the patch is quite
Op 18-09-2007 om 15:53 schreef Holger Levsen:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso
> >
> > Please don't use these images, we are not currently making weekly builds
> > of the installer
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:34:54 -0400 Joey Hess wrote:
> Using a netinst CD on a machine without a network is not very much
> recommended since it leaves you with a base system and no way to add
> whatever software you need, except for using a second CD.
Yes, that's correct. I primarily saw this
Package: libglib2.0-udeb
Version: 2.14.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hi!
Quoting the glib2.0/2.14.1-2 changelog:
* debian/control.in,
debian/rules:
+ Build against the system PCRE instead of the supplied one.
This change broke the udeb produced by glib2.0, as it now depends on li
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:15:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442430: fixed in linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 1.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:15:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440447: fixed in linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 1.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.21-2-486-di_1.54_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.21-2-486-di_1.54_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.21-2-486-di_1.54_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.21-2-486-di_1.54_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.21-2-amd64-di_1.32_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.21-2-amd64-di_1.32_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.21-2-amd64-di_1.32_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.21-2-amd64-di_1.32_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-mod
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testi
> >ng-i386-DVD-1.iso
>
> Please don't use these images, we are not currently making weekly builds
> of the installer DVDs. The image you tried was built last may,
Hi,
On Monday 17 September 2007 22:56, Joey Hess wrote:
> If people agree that adding UTC has a good case, I would argue
> against it that for country with only one timezone this would mean one more
> question to answer.
>
> Which is a good argument for only asking it in expert installs, if it's
>
> DI team: strange that, in two days, we had such similar reports using
> those obsolete "weekly builds".
>
Yes, it is strange.
When reading http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ with text
Or install the current weekly snapshot of Debian testing which uses
the same version of
Hello Anibal,
Op 18-09-2007 om 12:06 schreef Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> > #
> > tags 442430 pending
> Bug#442430: installation-reports
> There were no tags set.
> Tags added: pending
After c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 441448 pending
Bug#441448: ITP: ario -- A complete GTK2 client for MPD
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 442430 pending
Bug#442430: installation-reports
There were no tags s
Ciao a tutti,
I am not subscribed to this list so please send your answer also to my
address.
From some doys I have this message when I run the command
janni:~# /etc/init.d/console-setup start
Setting up console font and keymap...WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 214
WARNING: Undefined ke
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:48:54AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
And I bet we can find dozens of such examples where not using the
local time is pretty much as bad as using the same time everywhere.
Great...but I thought debian was about letting people decide for
themselves, not about boxing
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:28:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > It seems the vista DVD is a mixed iso9660/udf whose iso9660 contains a
> > README pointing out that you should use udf, etc. Probably other DVDs do
> > (or will do) the same. The default fstab setting makes "mou
Package: ttf-cjk-compact
version: 1.10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building ttf-cjk-compact in ttf-cjk-co
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:41:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442430: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Op 11-09-2007 om 11:11 schreef Richard G Riley:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0200, Richard G Riley wrote:
> >>
> >> In the end I replaced the IDE DVD drive with a SATA and it worked.
I would have replaced the motherboard,
with one that doe
Op 10-09-2007 om 18:11 schreef Rick Thomas:
> On Sep 8, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Jeremy Guitton wrote:
> >Le vendredi 07 septembre 2007, Jérémy Bobbio a écrit :
> >>
> >>Please try the following image:
> >>
> >> http://people.debian.org/~lunar/debian-40r1+proposed-updates-amd64-netinst.iso
> >>
> >>
Op 23-08-2007 om 16:08 schreef Bastian Blank:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:33:45PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > Please unfreeze wireless-tools. A number of packages are depending on
> > it, and they won't enter testing unless wireless-tools does.
>
> This includes an abi bump. Therefor d-i needs
Op 02-09-2007 om 22:11 schreef Bernd Zeimetz:
>
> First I have to say that I'm amazed that 2.6.21 booted at all on the
> v100, I didn't find a sparc machine where it booted successful yet.
> Removing and loading the dmfe module works well now, although it still
> doesn't have any function and needs
Op 16-09-2007 om 15:01 schreef Stefano Canepa:
> Il giorno dom, 16/09/2007, Christian Perrier ha scritto:
> > Some opened questions that come to my mind:
> >
> > - any objection to /me removing ppl who explicitely requested
> > to be removed?
>
> Remove them, they asked.
Yep ...
> > - what to
tags 434580 moreinfo
thanks
That was for the B.T.S.
Op 25-07-2007 om 18:52 schreef Frans Pop:
> Can you please send us the syslog (gzipped!) of an installation where this
> went wrong?
> If it also went wrong in your last installation (i.e. before you selected
> the vserver kernel), you will f
47 matches
Mail list logo
