Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> retitle 445211 Should prevent using separate partitions for /etc, /lib, /bin,
> /sbin, /dev
Bug#445211: installation-report: Kernel panics every time I try to boot it.
Changed Bug ti
Package: pkgsel
Version: 0.15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This patch adds an /usr/lib/pre-pkgsel.d/ directory where hooks can be
added in a run-parts fashion. popcon handling has been factored out
into its own script in this directory.
My main motivation for this patch is that I wanted the abi
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:57:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446943: Closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:44:16PM -0400, Robert Garron wrote:
> To Whom It May Concern at Debian:
>
> First -- Love the release 4.0r1 -- best yet! Used Debian on 32 bit before.
>
> Next, not sure who to report this to and/or ask the question, as I am
> relatively new to using the Debian site (us
To Whom It May Concern at Debian:
First -- Love the release 4.0r1 -- best yet! Used Debian on 32 bit before.
Next, not sure who to report this to and/or ask the question, as I am
relatively new to using the Debian site (used Redhat and SuSe in past),
anyway hopefully I have the right people I
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.53_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.53_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.53_i
libdebian-installer_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.53.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.53.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.53_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.53_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
libdebian-instal
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435701: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435330: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445592: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414408: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433429: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435329: fixed in tasksel 2.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.69_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.69_all.deb
tasksel_2.69.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.69.dsc
tasksel_2.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.69.tar.gz
tasksel_2.69_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.69_all.deb
Override entries f
tasksel_2.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.69.dsc
tasksel_2.69.tar.gz
tasksel_2.69_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.69_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
dann frazier wrote:
> OK. Just for my benefit, what's the difference? I assume the 'echo -n'
> above my change should get changed as well?
It's not POSIX and is grandfathered in in policy. So don't worry about
it, really..
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:05:30PM -0700, Aaron Porter wrote:
>
> I'm trying to roll out a custom kernel in my preseed setup (for a
> new hw raid), but I've gotten stuck by the installer claiming:
>
> anna[3954]: WARNING **: no packages for kernel in archive
This ended up being cau
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:52:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > OK. Just for my benefit, what's the difference? I assume the 'echo -n'
> > above my change should get changed as well?
>
> printf is POSIX, echo -n is faux-POSIX. :) (echo -n is explicitly listed in
> Debian policy as an addition
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:34:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Index: dhclient-script
> > > ===
> > > --- dhclient-script (revision 49779)
> > > +++ dhclient-script (working copy)
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@
> > >
FYI: The status of the ttf-cjk-compact source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.8
Current version: 1.11
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
-
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:50:22PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > + # If DHCP provides multiple servers, ignore all but the first
> > + dhcp_ntp=`echo $RET | cut -d' ' -f1`
>
> Please quote "$RET" here to make it less easy for a rogue NTP server to
> (acciden
Hi,
it appears that this problem has resolved itself as I have recently booted from
a 'debian-40r1-i386-kde-CD-1' and installed successfully.
many thanks to anyone who has been looking into this - if you have any possible
reasons why the 'hang' occured for future possible work arounds, then t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> Package: win32-loader
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> It is attached to this report.
Committed, thanks. Btw, in the future you can update this file directly,
it's in d-i repository (packages/arch/i386/).
--
Robert M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 446611 pending
Bug#446611: [INTL:gl] Galician translation of win32-loader
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Hi,
As a workaround: go Manual, afterwards Go back..
--
Eugen Dedu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445157: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233798: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391604: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402380: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327708: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434893: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233798: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233798: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.4_i386.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.4.dsc
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.4.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.4.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.4_all.deb
to pool/main/
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.4_i386.udeb: package says priority is required, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
debootstrap_1.0.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.4.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.4.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.4_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.4_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +# Return zero if it is possible to create devices and execute programs in
> +# this directory. (Both may be forbidden by mount options, e.g. nodev and
> +# noexec respectively.)
> +check_sane_mount () {
> + case "$ARCH" in
> +kfreebsd-*|hurd-*)
> +
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:08:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I forgot to attach the patch :/
> +check_mount_options () {
> +local mtab=/proc/mounts
> +local T=`readlink -f -n -q "$1"`
> +while [ -n "$T" ]; do
> +if cat $mtab | grep -q " $T "; then
> +# found
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:29:34 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed on 1.0.0 version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forcemerge 233798 281927
Bug#233798: debootstrap: Check if partition is mounted noexec or nodev
Bug#281927: debootstrap should check for proper mount permissions
Bug#324645: debootstr
40 matches
Mail list logo
