Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Independent of repository, I have no problems with tasksel being moved
> from the tasksel alioth package to the d-i one, if managing its committers
> is an issue.
This is an issue...but probably not important enough alone to motivate
a move.
That's a thou
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:05:27PM -0500, Charles Abdouch wrote:
>
> As this is a somewhat specialize need at the moment (though the expectation
> is that someday UEFI would be a standard on AMD64 and i386 platforms)
I sincerely hope this doesn't happen. It will be a major regression for
freedom
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:27:23PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-11 12:16]:
> > > Anyway, armel is the directory now and arm the symlink (don't ask).
> > >
> > > Do you have a new patch that uses initramfs?
> >
> > Here.
>
> Feel free to commit thi
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.89_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.89.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.89.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.24-1-amiga-di_0.89_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.24-1-amiga-di_0.89_m68k.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.24-1
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.24-1-amiga-di_0.89_m68k.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.24-1-atari-di_0.89_m68k.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM sup
Hi,
can I upload partman-multipath? Since it's not being used by default atm
this shouldn't cause any harm.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are several packages that we do want to list during package selection
in anna, but that should not be listed in the main menu.
The current list I'm aware of is:
- openssh-client-udeb
- fdisk-udeb
- cfdisk-udeb
- parted-udeb
One of the main deciding factors to list a component in anna is the
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frans Pop, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 21:05:30 +0100, a écrit :
>> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > I was wondering: since one of the goals of d-i for Lenny is to have a
>> > 2.6.24 kernel, and that it happens that that kernel has enough h
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
>
> linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that it
> does not require the kernel to be patched anymore
Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> can I upload partman-multipath? Since it's not being used by default atm
> this shouldn't cause any harm.
Yes, please do that.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Could you please hint openssl 0.9.8g-8 in testing?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Mario Lang wrote:
> >> The module will first need to be included in the regular Debian kernel
> >> image packages of course.
> >
> > Ah, can't it be a separate package?
>
> Isn't linux-modules-extra-2.6 where all the extra modules belong?
> Seems logical to work speakup in
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
>> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
>>
>> linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:46:34 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Mario Lang wrote:
> > >> The module will first need to be included in the regular Debian kernel
> > >> image packages of course.
> > >
> > > Ah, can't it be a separate package?
> >
> > Isn't linux-modules-extra-2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We've detected that loop-aes hasn't been accepted yet from
testing-proposed-updates queue and then Beta1 images lacks it.
The fastest solution, that will work at least for netboot and weekly
images is to get it accepted right now.
Please ftpm
(Please don't CC me on list mail.)
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The idea is to compile the speakup module out-of-tree but still include
> it in d-i.
Why would you want to compile a module that is in-tree as an out-of-tree
module? It just does not make any sense to me.
Anyw
flash-kernel_1.8_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_1.8.dsc
flash-kernel_1.8.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.8_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_1.8_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> >> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
> >
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Please don't CC me on list mail.)
>
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> The idea is to compile the speakup module out-of-tree but still include
>> it in d-i.
>
> Why would you want to compile a module that is in-tree as an out-of-tree
> m
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_1.8_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_1.8_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_1.8.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.8.dsc
flash-kernel_1.8.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.8.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.8_arm.deb
to pool/m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please hint openssl 0.9.8g-8 in testing?
Ack!
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:29:56 +0100, a écrit :
> (Please don't CC me on list mail.)
Then tell your mailer to use followup-to :)
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > The idea is to compile the speakup module out-of-tree but still include
> > it in d-i.
>
> Why would you
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
> Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
> source to GPL-export 4 symbols,
Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the regular linux-2.6
kernel. That patch is already in the -mm tree actually.
Sa
Hello,
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:31:03 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > >> Samuel Thibault <[
Hello,
Otavio Salvador, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 15:06:58 -0300, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> >> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
> >>
> >> linux
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
> > Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
> > source to GPL-export 4 symbols,
>
> Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the reg
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:29:56 +0100, a écrit :
> > (Please don't CC me on list mail.)
>
> Then tell your mailer to use followup-to :)
That's an unofficial (or at least fairly recent) header that unfortunately
my MUA does not support.
How
Otavio,
am Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:24:04PM -0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> We've detected that loop-aes hasn't been accepted yet from
> testing-proposed-updates queue and then Beta1 images lacks it.
>
> The fastest solution, that will work at least for netboot and weekly
> images is to get
Kurt,
am Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:40:42PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Could you please hint openssl 0.9.8g-8 in testing?
unblocked. Will go in as soon as the hppa build is installed.
Cheers,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : htt
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:44:03 +0100, a écrit :
> > The idea is not to compile speakup built into the kernel, but just as a
> > module, and then it doesn't need to be integrated to the kernel build
> > system,
>
> Compiling it into the kernel is not what I'm talking about. It definitely
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
> > > Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
> > > source to GPL-expo
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It is not part of the upstream kernel.
OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies.
Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can
really discuss inclusion in the installer.
Having it in l-m-e should not be a problem for u
FWIW, I think this move of win32-loader is pretty silly, both from the
perspective of why we originally decided to have a packages/ subdirectory,
and in that it seems to assume win32-loader is a special case, which it
isn't -- mklibs, kernel-wedge, debian-installer, and
debian-installer-manual also
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> make $(cat allmodules.mk) SUBDIRS=$PWD -C /some/where/linux-whatever
First: s/SUBDIRS/M/.
Second:
| $ make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-powerpc M=$(pwd) $(cat allmodule.mk)
| make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 04:01:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, I think this move of win32-loader is pretty silly, both from the
> perspective of why we originally decided to have a packages/ subdirectory,
> and in that it seems to assume win32-loader is a special case, which it
> isn't -- mklib
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 21:40:24 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > It is not part of the upstream kernel.
>
> OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies.
No problem.
> Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can
> really dis
Frans,
I ran /bin/archdetect on both my system and my MiniMac and in both cases
got:
i386/generic
So it appears even on the Mac that /lib/partman/lib/disk-label.sh doesn't
take the Mac path in:
i386)
case "$sub" in
mac)
echo
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, I think this move of win32-loader is pretty silly, both from the
> perspective of why we originally decided to have a packages/
> subdirectory, and in that it seems to assume win32-loader is a special
> case, which it isn't --
> mklibs
Agreed. I
Dear DDs,
could you please add these to items to [1]. I think this will save some
people some time in finding out, that it does not work.
1. [25 March 2008] Installing Debian when sid is selected leaves an
unconfigured system [2][3].
Is there a way to fix this during the installation?
a) Use b
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
> >
> > once it is in next
>
> "in next"?
next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the next
merge window aka 2.6.26 now.
> > 2.6.24 window is closed any
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Paul Menzel wrote:
> could you please add these to items to [1]. I think this will save some
> people some time in finding out, that it does not work.
>
> 1. [25 March 2008] Installing Debian when sid is selected leaves an
> unconfigured system [2][3].
Don't think this is
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Mario Lang wrote:
>> >> The module will first need to be included in the regular Debian kernel
>> >> image packages of course.
>> >
>> > Ah, can't it be a separate package?
>>
>> Isn't linux-modules-extra-2.6 where all the extra mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
>> FWIW, I think this move of win32-loader is pretty silly, both from the
>> perspective of why we originally decided to have a packages/
>> subdirectory, and in that i
Hi,
I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
versions of e2fsprogs hit testing, so there wouldn't be as many issues
with the debian insta
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 23:27:14 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
> > >
> > > once it is in next
> >
> > "in next"?
>
> next is the linux tree of things that are r
Le Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100
Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Frans Pop, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 21:05:30 +0100, a écrit :
> >> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> > I was wondering: since one of the goals of d-i for
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > 2.6.24 window is closed anyway.
>> >
>> > You mean the upstream or the Debian?
>>
>> debian
>
> Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make
> it into it :/
Beta2 is probably going to be released with 2.6.24 but I gues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi Ted,
> I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
> from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
> believe you had requested that I coordinate with y
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:31:50PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> > I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
> > from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
> > believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
> > ver
Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm still of opinion to choose another dir for them. I've proposed[1]
Depends if we have many of them or not. All propositions you made were
indeed OK for me.
> few alternatives for directory names but noone commented on them; the
> move has been d
50 matches
Mail list logo
