Dear all,
i have read http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/NetworkConsole
Is this method of installation is available by using Stable or testing
Debian installers ? is there any parameter to pass on boot to get DI to do
network console installation ?
--
Armin ranjbar , System Administrator
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20080419-19:02
Severity: normal
I installed Debian using the win32 installer from
goodbye-microsoft.com, and while resizing my NTFS partition the progress
bar stayed at 0% until the operation was completed. This is especially
problematic because immediately
Hi,
I filed an installation-report, but I thought I send this here since it
won't necessarily be seen for a while. I used the 20080412-2 netinst
daily image (because of problems with the last successful build which
was 20080416-2 when I installed yesterday or the day before) and had to
edit /usr/
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> As partman prefers the latter notation over the former, the fact that
> parted_devices does not support the latter causes problems, for example
> in partman-base's init.d/parted script.
This has been worked around in init.d/parted by converting /dev/mdX
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 19 April 2008, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
I've installed Debian many times, but this time I'm having an issue.
I've got Windows XP on /dev/hda1, and I have a pre-existing ext3 volume
with data I need on /dev/hdd. But I can't figure out a way to get the
installe
Package: partman-base
As I understand it, RAID devices are being transitioned from /dev/mdX
to /dev/md/X. Currently parted_devices (or probably rather libparted),
still returns the former, even if a RAID device was created as the latter.
This is if both block device files exist. If the former d
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
On Saturday 19 April 2008, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> I've installed Debian many times, but this time I'm having an issue.
> I've got Windows XP on /dev/hda1, and I have a pre-existing ext3 volume
> with data I need on /dev/hdd. But I can't figure out a way to get the
> installer to use /dev/h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 475479 If /boot is on RAID, /boot mountpoint record is lost after
> configuring LVM
Bug#475479: If /boot is on RAID, /boot mountpoint record is lost when
configuring
Changed Bug title to `If /boot is on RAID, /boot mountpoint record is lost
a
reassign 475479 partman-base
severity 475479 important
tags 475479 confirmed
retitle 475479 If /boot is on RAID, /boot mountpoint record is lost when
configuring
LVM
thanks
On Friday 11 April 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I realized I mistated the situation in my first report. /boot is on a
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 475479 partman-base
Bug#475479: debian-installer: If /boot is partitioned before RAID then LVM,
/boot mountpoint record is lost
Bug reassigned from package `partman-lvm' to `partman-base'.
> severity 475479 important
Bug#475479: debian-instal
Accepted:
localechooser_2.02.dsc
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.02.dsc
localechooser_2.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.02.tar.gz
localechooser_2.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_2.02_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
loca
localechooser_2.02_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
localechooser_2.02.dsc
localechooser_2.02.tar.gz
localechooser_2.02_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Saturday 19 April 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> arm/ixp4xx (on a NSLU2): the installation seemed to take much longer
> than normally (maybe something increased in size, causing more
> swapping?), but worked mostly ok.
Nothing comes to mind. Can you quantify where the delays are?
If not, repla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476848 installation-reports
Bug#476848: installer cannot mount cd-rom during installation
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-reports'.
> tags 476848 + moreinfo
Bug#476848: installer cannot mount cd-rom during i
reassign 476848 installation-reports
tags 476848 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi!
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 05:09:49PM +0200, crack7 crack7 wrote:
> Package: boot-floppies
"boot-floppies" are no more in Debian since Sarge. The new installation
software for Debian is unimaginatively called "debian-installer"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476848 installation-reports
Bug#476848:
Warning: Unknown package 'boot-floppies'
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `installation-reports'.
> retitle 476848 installer cannot mount cd-rom during installation
Bug#476848:
Changed Bu
Package: boot-floppies
Version: debian-40r3-i386-DVD-1.iso
flavor:debian-40r3-i386-DVD-1.iso
architecture: i386
model: notebook Fujitsu-Siemens C1020
memory:512Mb
scsi:
cd-rom:QSI DVDRW-041
network card: Realtek Semiconductor RTL-8139
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476180 apt-cdrom-setup
Bug#476180: installation problem (and solution)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `apt-cdrom-setup'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 476180 apt-cdrom-setup
thanks
Op 14-04-2008 om 23:58 schreef Jean-Yves Moyen:
> Boot method: CD
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso
> Date: 14 April 2008, 22:00 GMT.
> cdimage labelle "20080407-12:13"
With a daily from today:
arm/ixp4xx (on a NSLU2): the installation seemed to take much longer
than normally (maybe something increased in size, causing more
swapping?), but worked mostly ok. After reboot, no getty was started
on the serial console. The logs contain:
Apr 19 16:51:42 finish-instal
I've installed Debian many times, but this time I'm having an issue.
I've got Windows XP on /dev/hda1, and I have a pre-existing ext3 volume
with data I need on /dev/hdd. But I can't figure out a way to get the
installer to use /dev/hdd as the installation volume. What's the best
way to do this
FYI, pm-utils 1.1.0 has been out for a while.
"All the scripts that make up pm-utils have been rewritten to conform to
POSIX and the Single Unix Specification. Any remaining bashisms or
GNUisms are bugs. If you encounter a script that is not POSIX and SuS
compliant, please file a bug. "
--
Sam M
Package: disk-detect
Version: 1.60
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
when enabling multipath support multipath-udeb gets installed which
pulls in the multipath-modules- udeb via a dependency. Afterwards
these modules are immediately being loaded. This fails currently since
we're missing a call to
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_1.11.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.11.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.11.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.11_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.11_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
rootskel-
rootskel-gtk_1.11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.11.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.11.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.11_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_1.10.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.10.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.10.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.10_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.10_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
rootskel-
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> My proposal would be to modify both cdebconf and debconf so that the last
> C in Choices-C is interpreted as "Codes" and not as "C locale", and thus
> also display the value of the Choices field if debconf/language is set to
> C.
After a private ping,
rootskel-gtk_1.10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.10.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.10.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.10_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470259: fixed in rootskel-gtk 1.09
has caused the Debian Bug report #470259,
regarding rootskel-gtk: gtk-set-font should use debconf/language instead of
debian-installer/language
to be mark
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_1.09.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.09.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.09.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.09.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.09_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_1.09_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
rootskel-
rootskel-gtk_1.09_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.09.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.09.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.09_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476614: fixed in anna 1.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #476614,
regarding apt-cdrom-setup not loaded during lowmem netinst install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Accepted:
anna_1.31.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.31.dsc
anna_1.31.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.31.tar.gz
anna_1.31_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.31_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
anna_1.31.dsc - source debian-installer
anna_1.31_amd64.udeb - standard debian-in
anna_1.31_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
anna_1.31.dsc
anna_1.31.tar.gz
anna_1.31_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:00:59PM +0800, Glenn Saberton wrote:
>>> Why not do some refactoring then? Or sharing the code altogether?
>> If there are no objections, I will add the functions to dhcp.c which
>> will address the gl
Quoting Glenn Saberton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thats correct, I am not currently subscribed to the list. As most
> people probably are, I am subscribed to a few high volume lists and I
> usually try not to add more unless I really need to. I may well
> subscribe in the not to distant future,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:00:59PM +0800, Glenn Saberton wrote:
> > Why not do some refactoring then? Or sharing the code altogether?
>
> If there are no objections, I will add the functions to dhcp.c which
> will address the global variable above also
Well, for the global variable, I am not tru
tags 476767 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 02:37:02AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SISTEMA DI BASE IN CORSO - 75% - memorizzazione della lingua in corso
> (" The installation is to go in error in this moment: ISTALLATION OF
> BASE SYSTEM GOING - 75% - memoring of linguage going").
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 476767 + moreinfo
Bug#476767: first attempt failed, second one was OK
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> (Full quote as Christian forgot to CC Glenn.)
>
> Oh, my apologies for that
>
> Glenn, is is correct that you're not subscribed to -boot?
>
> That would be sad as I was pereson
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (Full quote as Christian forgot to CC Glenn.)
Oh, my apologies for that
Glenn, is is correct that you're not subscribed to -boot?
That would be sad as I was peresonnally very happy to see that someone
was caring about netcfg, finally..:-)
But, well,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erm, I was thinking of the wrong file when I was talking about the
global var. Will have to think a bit more about that one.
Cheers
Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://eni
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 476767 first attempt failed, second one was OK
Bug#476767: (no subject)
Changed Bug title to `first attempt failed, second one was OK' from `(no
subject)'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:16:47PM +0800, Glenn wrote:
>> New patch attached regarding Christian Perrier's comments.
>
> First, I recommend that you think about using git to prepare your
> patchset before submitting.
no probl
45 matches
Mail list logo
