Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:50:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#496598: fix for #494466 causes netinst to fail
has caused the Debian Bug report #496598,
regarding fix for #494466 causes netinst to fail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I believe it is a good time for that. Martin will propose his patch
> but except from that I think we don't have any other change that
> requires string changes planned for lenny.
So, I'm now waiting for Martin to commit his patch to officially
decl
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.35
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I successfully installed Debian GNU/Linux on my Linksys NSLU2. Many
thanks to all the information on the http://www.nslu2-linux.org
website and Martin Michlmayr's Debian specific install
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.94
Severity: serious
hey,
HP QA reported an issue with the most recent netinst builds for i386
and amd64. Their report follows:
*
New lenny builds of 24th Aug ??? both amd64 and i686 bit failed during
installing the base system leading to installtion in
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:17:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496093: fixed in cdebconf 0.134
has caused the Debian Bug report #496093,
regarding Partition Manager hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:17:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#487691: fixed in cdebconf 0.134
has caused the Debian Bug report #487691,
regarding user-setup: endless loop after entering empty root passwords
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:17:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496093: fixed in cdebconf 0.134
has caused the Debian Bug report #496093,
regarding Installer breaks with RAID, LVM, Encryption
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.134_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.134_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.134_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.134_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.134_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.134_all.udeb
cdebco
cdebconf_0.134_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.134.dsc
cdebconf_0.134.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.134_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.134_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.134_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.134_i386.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.134_i386.udeb
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:59:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#492828: preseeding filesystem labels (patch)
has caused the Debian Bug report #492828,
regarding preseeding filesystem labels (patch)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_35_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_35_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_35_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_35_all.udeb
partman-crypto_35.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_35.dsc
partman-crypto_35.tar.gz
Accepted:
partman-lvm_64.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_64.dsc
partman-lvm_64.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_64.tar.gz
partman-lvm_64_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_64_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-lvm_64.dsc - source debian
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_62.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_62.dsc
partman-partitioning_62.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_62.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_62_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_6
Accepted:
partman-auto-raid_13.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_13.dsc
partman-auto-raid_13.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_13.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_13_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_13_all.udeb
Override entrie
Accepted:
partman-md_43.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_43.dsc
partman-md_43.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_43.tar.gz
partman-md_43_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_43_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-md_43.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-partitioning_62_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_62.dsc
partman-partitioning_62.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_62_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
partman-md_43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-md_43.dsc
partman-md_43.tar.gz
partman-md_43_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
partman-lvm_64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_64.dsc
partman-lvm_64.tar.gz
partman-lvm_64_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
partman-crypto_35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_35.dsc
partman-crypto_35.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_35_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_35_all.udeb
partman-crypto_35_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385220: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 29
has caused the Debian Bug report #385220,
regarding partman-auto-lvm should support multiple volume groups from recipes
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#484272: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 29
has caused the Debian Bug report #484272,
regarding partman-auto-lvm: Should support for explicit logical volume names in
recipes
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462396: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 29
has caused the Debian Bug report #462396,
regarding Multiple disks support for partman-auto-lvm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Accepted:
partman-auto-crypto_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_10.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_10.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_10_all.udeb
Accepted:
partman-base_125.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_125.dsc
partman-base_125.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_125.tar.gz
partman-base_125_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_125_i386.udeb
partman-utils_125_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-b
Accepted:
partman-auto_81.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_81.dsc
partman-auto_81.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_81.tar.gz
partman-auto_81_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_81_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_81.dsc - s
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_29.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_29.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_29.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_29.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_29_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_29_all.udeb
Override entries for you
partman-base_125_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_125.dsc
partman-base_125.tar.gz
partman-base_125_i386.udeb
partman-utils_125_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
partman-auto-lvm_29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_29.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_29.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
partman-auto-raid_13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_13.dsc
partman-auto-raid_13.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_13_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
partman-auto_81_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_81.dsc
partman-auto_81.tar.gz
partman-auto_81_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
partman-auto-crypto_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-crypto_10.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_10.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On 2008-08-24 12:03, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:48:05PM +0300, root wrote:
I installed Debian lenny successfully using the beta2 installer.
However the installer didn't support raid10, and I already created
a raid10 array (using Debian sid from an old HDD), and a raid1 a
Hi!
While reading the i386 installation guide from cover to cover, I have
taken some notes about some changes that could improve it.
If anyone feels like working on this, just do it. You can just apply
the attached patch and grep for "XXX" and "TODO" to find all the
little things on which you co
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:03:27AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > The attached patch against network-console adds an extra step during
>> > debian-installer startup that just does that when "BOOT_DEBUG=3" and
>> > "device=ethX" are specified on the c
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:03:27AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > The attached patch against network-console adds an extra step during
> > debian-installer startup that just does that when "BOOT_DEBUG=3" and
> > "device=ethX" are specified on the command-line.
> >
> > It's a little bit crude, bu
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> I noticed this text today in the d-i menu: "Don't install any
> bootloader." Unlike all other descriptions, this one has a dot at the
> end. It might make sense to remove this dot before the string freeze
> to improve consistency.
>
I'll have a look at this and will
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> I need a debconf prompt that can be used as a partman check to tell
> users that their boot partition has to be either ext2 or ext3. This
> is needed on the HP mv2120 and Kurobox Pro.
>
> partman-ext2r0/boot_not_ext2r0 does something similar so based on this
> templat
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch against network-console adds an extra step during
> debian-installer startup that just does that when "BOOT_DEBUG=3" and
> "device=ethX" are specified on the command-line.
>
> It's a little bit crude, but was truly helpful on solving t
I noticed this text today in the d-i menu: "Don't install any
bootloader." Unlike all other descriptions, this one has a dot at the
end. It might make sense to remove this dot before the string freeze
to improve consistency.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I need a debconf prompt that can be used as a partman check to tell
users that their boot partition has to be either ext2 or ext3. This
is needed on the HP mv2120 and Kurobox Pro.
partman-ext2r0/boot_not_ext2r0 does something similar so based on this
template I suggest:
_Description: Go back to
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I am wondering if we should include virtio-modules in i386 and amd64
> netboot images.
>
> For my personal needs, I am adding this udeb to my own development
> buids, but maybe this should be done for the release as well.
> This would allow bette
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> forcemerge 496093 496446
Bug#496093: Installer breaks with RAID, LVM, Encryption
Bug#496446: Partition Manager hangs
Forcibly Merged 496093 496446.
>
End of message, stoppin
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-25 10:10]:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > - the question was not asked (because debconf priority > medium)
>
> That would break the case where the architecture default if different from
> the default of initramfs-tools
This would
On Monday 25 August 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> - the question was not asked (because debconf priority > medium)
That would break the case where the architecture default if different from
the default of initramfs-tools.
> - the policy is the same as the default of initramfs-tools (most)
I
Frans,
There's one thing that imho could be improved with the current
driver-policy handling. IMHO it would make sense not to create the
/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy file if these conditions are
met:
- the question was not asked (because debconf priority > medium)
- the policy is t
Just for the record, this works as expected. Thanks a lot for
implementing this, Frans!
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
46 matches
Mail list logo
