Bug#546834: debootstrap fails when invoked from lh_build

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 546834 util-linux 2.16-3 severity 546834 serious affects 546834 debootstrap tags 546834 d-i thanks On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Tak Auyeung wrote: lh_build failed and stopped in debootstrap phase. lh_build is set up to use sid for both bootstrap and chroot. Attached please find a

Processed: Re: Bug#546834: debootstrap fails when invoked from lh_build

2009-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 546834 util-linux 2.16-3 Bug #546834 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails when invoked from lh_build Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'util-linux'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.15. Bug #546834

Bug#468624: marked as done (python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies)

2009-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:32:04 + with message-id e1mntg4-00033r...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#468624: fixed in discover-data 2.2008.06.25+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468624, regarding python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies to be marked

Unable to install Debian from USB

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Klinger
Hello, currently I seem to be unable to install Debain from a USB pendrive. I've been doing this before, and it worked well. Also, I am used to live with a testing distro. So I'm quite frustrated. I'm using the boot.img.gz from

Re: Unable to install Debian from USB

2009-09-16 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Stefan Klinger: Hello, currently I seem to be unable to install Debain from a USB pendrive. I've been doing this before, and it worked well. Also, I am used to live with a testing distro. So I'm quite frustrated. I'm using the boot.img.gz

Re: Unable to install Debian from USB

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Klinger
Thank you for the help Felix. Known kernel bug. Already fixed upstream and marked pending Just add `nopat' to the boot options This works, however, it leaves me with a non-functional keyboard. The language selection shows up, but I cannot select anything. I'm using a Apple USB keyboard,

debian 503 Bildwiederholfrequenz

2009-09-16 Thread Uwe Lehmann
Hallo, kurz: nach der Installation und Neustart, wird noch vor dem Aufruf des Login Bildschirms eine (wahrscheinlich) zu hohe Bildwiederholfrequenz gewählt. debian-503-amd64-DVD-1.iso (mit Standart Installation) TFT-Bildschirm (über VGA !) Für eine Installation von Gnome bzw. KDE über die

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 14:09 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-10 01:22]: Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot with 2.6 kernels, unless there is

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be converted to using initramfs? Actually, I don't see how this can work today since ext2 is a module... Has anyone tested that these work in lenny? There are no floppy

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Lee Winter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be converted to using initramfs? Actually, I don't see how this can work today since ext2 is a module...

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote: So why can't all of the the lenny/squeeze installations be done with the kernel from etch or even sarge? This would seem to be completely within the jurisdiction of the installer team. Am I missing something? 1) Because it still needs to be

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-09-16 18:07]: We also have: ./config/armel/ads.cfg:11:INITRD_FS = ext2 No idea about this, although I think I saw a reply from Martin about it (specifically enabled in the armel config IIRC). We don't have a kernel for ADS in Debian, we merely provide a

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Lee Winter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote: So why can't all of the the lenny/squeeze installations be done with the kernel from etch or even sarge? This would seem to be completely within the jurisdiction of the

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:24:00PM -0400, Lee Winter wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be converted to using initramfs?

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
(No need to CC me on replies.) On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote: Nah. The whole point is to support legacy systems that are capable of _running_ the newest software, but whose peripheral suite is not adequte to _bootstrap_ the larger images. is it your belief that the

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Lee Winter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:24:00PM -0400, Lee Winter wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is installation from floppies

Re: Debian-installer use of initrd (was Re: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y)

2009-09-16 Thread Lee Winter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: (No need to CC me on replies.) On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote: Nah. The whole point is to support legacy systems that are capable of _running_ the newest software, but whose peripheral suite is not adequte

Bug#546983: console-setup-mini: fails to set the keyboard layout (and falls back to us layout)

2009-09-16 Thread Francesco Poli (t1000)
Package: console-setup-mini Version: 1.44 Severity: important Hi! I upgraded my Debian testing (squeeze) notebook yesterday and various packages were upgraded (among which several xorg packages). Due to dependencies, console-setup-mini was pulled in, as confirmed by /var/log/aptitude :

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
user debian-boot@lists.debian.org usertags 541831 sparc tags 541831 moreinfo thanks Hi Stephen, On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote: On Monday 17 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: It sounds like the rsc console is something different, which could explain what you saw. Maybe we

Processed: Re: Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user debian-boot@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-boot@lists.debian.org (was sg...@debian.org). usertags 541831 sparc Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now:

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Frans Pop said: Hi Stephen, Hi Frans, Are you interested in persuing this further? In case you're not, I'm tagging the BR for posterity. I am interested - my problem at the moment is that the machine has been promised for the sparc64 port. I'm waiting on doko

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Yep, I know about that post, but I'm not sure whether that's related or not. AFAIK that issue was about having no console output at all, not about incorrect configuration of the installed system. Well, the second part of the mail is this issue.

Bug#541831: installation-reports: Sunfire T2000 success (one minor issue)

2009-09-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Stephen Gran wrote: FWIW, I've been pointed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2009/04/msg00024.html . The follow up suggests it may already have some fixes in? It's possible I may not have gotten the r1 image, although I thought I was using the latest

Bug#547048: win32-loader: Wrong Content-Type for index.php.tr

2009-09-16 Thread Hilmi Karatatar
Package: win32-loader Severity: normal http://goodbye-microsoft.com/ with Turkish locale auto redirect to /index.php.tr page which is wrong content. I have just checked simply running: wget -SO - 'http://goodbye-microsoft.com/index.php.tr' /dev/null returns Content-Type:

Processing of dh-di_3_i386.changes

2009-09-16 Thread Archive Administrator
dh-di_3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dh-di_3.dsc dh-di_3.tar.gz dh-di_3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

dh-di_3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-09-16 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: dh-di_3.dsc to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_3.dsc dh-di_3.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_3.tar.gz dh-di_3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_3_all.deb Override entries for your package: dh-di_3.dsc - source devel dh-di_3_all.deb - optional devel Announcing to