Bug#552067: Install process "forgets" the CD if left alone for long time

2009-10-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 05:16:01AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > The most likely explanation looks to me that the system (temporarily?) > loses connection with the device and has some problem identifying it again > when you resume the installation and the connection to the device is > reactivated.

Bug#552495: busybox-udeb: please enable dd conv=notrunc

2009-10-26 Thread Colin Watson
Package: busybox-udeb Version: 1:1.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic I'd like to apply a patch to partman-basicfilesystems which reads the UUID out of a swap partition before formatting it and then puts it back. This is important because it'

Bug#552497: hw-detect: file conflict with udev-udeb for /lib/udev/firmware.agent

2009-10-26 Thread Frans Pop
Package: hw-detect Version: 1.73 Severity: serious During a D-I build on armel I noticed the following: Unpacking udev-udeb (from udebs/udev-udeb.udeb) ... dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled: trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/firmware.agent', which is also in package hw-dete

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:14 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I tried downgrading binutils, as you suggested in your next mail, to > > 2.19.91.20091006-1 from testing and still saw no issues. > > Hmmm. Another option is that it's due to a libc version sk

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > After updating the system the problem disappears. So, that confirms the > reason is outdated buildd environments after an API change in libc (2.9 > -> 2.10). The first 2.10 upload was 18 Okt, so the problem should be > only about a week old. s/API/ABI/

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote: > I tried downgrading binutils, as you suggested in your next mail, to > 2.19.91.20091006-1 from testing and still saw no issues. Hmmm. Another option is that it's due to a libc version skew. During a build libc6 is copied from the host system (becau

[D-I Manual] bad entity in urls.ent

2009-10-26 Thread Philippe Batailler
Hello, A french reader of the manual reported that the link to "kernel traffic" in http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch01s02.html.fr was pointing at a russian porn site. The entity is defined in build/entities/urls.ent as http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/index.html";>. Best

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:55 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Thanks for making an effort to look into this. > > On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Thanks. I still cannot reproduce so I am somewhat clutching at straws. I > > compared the logs for a local (successful) i386 run of the daily

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > If you cannot reproduce it with an up-to-date sid build environment then > it's quite possible that the buildds are simply outdated. > apt and dpkg are not really relevant here. More relevant are versions of > mklibs itself and packages like binutils.

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Frans Pop
Thanks for making an effort to look into this. On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote: > Thanks. I still cannot reproduce so I am somewhat clutching at straws. I > compared the logs for a local (successful) i386 run of the daily-build > script vs. the logs from > http://people.debian.org/~j

Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]

2009-10-26 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 15:00 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure > > which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing? > > No, daily images get build in a sid environment

Processed: Re: Bug#552409: grub-installer: Fix grub2 boot of gnumach

2009-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 552409 pending Bug #552409 [grub-installer] grub-installer: Fix grub2 boot of gnumach Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#552409: grub-installer: Fix grub2 boot of gnumach

2009-10-26 Thread Felix Zielcke
tag 552409 pending thanks Am Montag, den 26.10.2009, 02:47 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Package: grub-installer > Version: 1.47 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hello, > > The attached patch fixes the grub2 menuentry generated for GNU/Hurd: > since 1.97 grub2 does not pass the module pat

Visit my Netlog profile

2009-10-26 Thread saleh islam
Hey, I have created a Netlog profile with my pictures, videos, blogs and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. You first need to register on Netlog! When you log in, you can create your own profile. Take a look: http://en.netlog.com/go/mailurl/type=invite_1&mailid=56791289