Hi!
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:53:29 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> debootstrap don't _need_ to support all features of all valid .debs
> but the features accepted in base packages. This doesn't mean we
> shouldn't add features when possible but it is not a requirement for
> debootstrap POV.
One o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 558229 serious
Bug #558229 [console-setup] Policy violation §12.3: postinst requires files in
/usr/share/doc.
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
severity 558229 serious
thanks
Quoting Trent W. Buck (trentb...@gmail.com):
> Package: console-setup
> Version: 1.49
> Severity: normal
>
> When installing the emdebian "gripped" version of 1.49:
>
> > Setting up console-setup (1.49em1) ...
> > cat: /usr/share/doc/console-setup/examples/console-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 540822 pending
Bug #540822 [tasksel] tasksel: [INTL:sk] Slovak translation
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 545312 pending
Bug #545312 [tasksel] tasksel: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping process
FYI: The status of the base-installer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.102
Current version: 1.103
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
* Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-11-26 18:56]:
> Why not just ask the user if d-i should mark the partition as bootable?
> I'm not sure if this is easily implementable, but if it is, I think this
> would be user friendlier than the proposed solution.
>
> E.g something along the lines of: Your boot partit
Hi!
* Gerfried Fuchs [091127 11:43]:
> One suggestion that is pretty easy to implement and also should be
> helpful straight ahead: Why not make amd64 and i386 appear in *bold*
> letters?
Would it be to much to ask to replace the single "amd64" with "amd64 /
Intel EM64-T" (or however it's calle
* Frans Pop [2009-11-27 00:27:07 CET]:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Why should users have to learn what Debian's internal name for their
> > architecture is?
>
> Because that is what they see/need when they look at the sources.list or
> package names?
I have no po
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.49
Severity: normal
When installing the emdebian "gripped" version of 1.49:
> Setting up console-setup (1.49em1) ...
> cat: /usr/share/doc/console-setup/examples/console-setup: No such file or
> directory
Relying on the existence of files in /usr/share/doc bein
9 matches
Mail list logo
