On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
I also fixed hppa today
Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
initial run.
Ping. hppa is still not being built automatically.
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Friday 21 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
I also fixed hppa today
Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
initial run.
Ping. hppa is still not being built automatically.
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100521 08:01]:
On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
I also fixed hppa today
Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
initial run.
Ping. hppa is still not being built
[Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to -boot]
Hello,
According to [1] I should have push permission, since I have permissions
also for d-i (being one of the Romanian translators).
[1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/i18n/ch01s05.html
I get this:
m...@think:tasksel$ git push
Counting
Quoting Andrei Popescu (andreimpope...@gmail.com):
[Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to -boot]
Hello,
According to [1] I should have push permission, since I have permissions
also for d-i (being one of the Romanian translators).
tasksel and d-i are different projects on Alioth, so
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 20:12 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
Also, it would be great to add a test case to tests/arm
I'll do that and submit an updated patch soon.
Done; updated patch and testcase tarballs attached. Tests
On Fri,21.May.10, 22:02:31, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Andrei Popescu (andreimpope...@gmail.com):
According to [1] I should have push permission, since I have permissions
also for d-i (being one of the Romanian translators).
tasksel and d-i are different projects on Alioth, so
* Ryan Tandy tarp...@gmail.com [2010-05-21 12:45]:
Done; updated patch and testcase tarballs attached. Tests pass.
Looks good to me. I've applied this.
Thanks a lot!
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
oldsys-preseed_3.11_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_3.11.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.11.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.11_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_3.11.dsc
to main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.11.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.11.tar.gz
to main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.11.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.11_armel.udeb
to main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.11_armel.udeb
Override entries for your package:
On Friday 21 May 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Unfortunately I still get the same error. I even 'rm -rf' the whole
directory and started from scratch, but I still get the same error.
Give it some time...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 21:39:04 +
with message-id e1ofzvs-0002hh...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#580709: fixed in oldsys-preseed 3.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #580709,
regarding oldsys-preseed: add support for Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live platform
to be marked as
[no need to CC me if you you keep debian-l10n-romanian in the loop]
Hello,
I just had a look at the Romanian task and would have some questions and
suggestions.
romanian-desktop:
xfonts-terminus is mentioned twice
ttf-liberation would also be a good choice, but it's already recommended
by
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:34 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
There definitely needs to be some kind of check in the script then to
prevent people from accidentally bricking their boxes. It looks like
the Buffalo u-boot exposes a version in the BOOTVER environment
variable: 1.01 for the original
Quoting Andrei Popescu (andreimpope...@gmail.com):
romanian-desktop:
xfonts-terminus is mentioned twice
That's right and should be corrected...which I did.
ttf-liberation would also be a good choice, but it's already recommended
by openoffice.org. Does it make sense to add it to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
