Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#595914: Re: Re: Bug#595914: Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 595914 kernel-wedge Bug #595914 [linux-2.6] Broadcom BCM57780 Ethernet controller support Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'kernel-wedge'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 595914:

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#595914: Re: Re: Bug#595914: Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
reassign 595914 kernel-wedge thanks The BCM57780 needs a separate PHY driver module. It looks like these aren't currently packaged in d-i. You should include kernel/drivers/net/phy/*.ko in an appropriate package, presumably nic-extra-modules-*. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, a

Bug#587658: I'm having this problem too

2010-09-08 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
On 08-09-2010 23:04, joan wrote: > I'm sorry, but, at the moment, debian installer can't recognize my > Broadcom ethernet card :-( > > Regards > > Al 08/09/10 18:30, En/na Christian PERRIER ha escrit: >> Quoting joan (calb...@pangea.org): >> >>> My netinst: Debian 5.0.6 (stable / lenny) >>> My

Bug#596106: Netinst Bug

2010-09-08 Thread joan
Yes, you are right and daily build has load well. Ps.: but I had done what your link page (installer page) says: "*To install Debian testing*, we recommend you use the *squeeze Alpha1 release* of the installer" Regards, Joan Al 08/09/10 20:17, En/na Christian PERRIER ha escrit: tags 596106

Bug#587658: I'm having this problem too

2010-09-08 Thread joan
I'm sorry, but, at the moment, debian installer can't recognize my Broadcom ethernet card :-( Regards Al 08/09/10 18:30, En/na Christian PERRIER ha escrit: Quoting joan (calb...@pangea.org): My netinst: Debian 5.0.6 (stable / lenny) My computer: Dell inspiron 570 lspci output: Ethernet co

Bug#553463: About "No kernel modules were found" at "Load Installer components from CD" PowerPC businesscard

2010-09-08 Thread Rick Thomas
I'll be happy to. Do you specifically want the "mini.iso"? Or would "buisnesscard" do just as well? If I don't hear back I'll try both. Enjoy! Rick On Sep 8, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: severity 553463 important tags 553463 moreinfo thanks Sorry, Rick, for not coming ba

Processed: Bug unreproducible with current images

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 584201 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #584201 [debian-installer] debian-installer: KDE expert graphical netinst doesn't create users or set root password Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#584201: Bug unreproducible with current images

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
tags 584201 unreproducible moreinfo thanks I can't reproduce that bug with current images. Would you mind trying http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/mini.iso and confirm whether root password is set and a user is created? -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#590869: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful installation: ASUS X5DAF)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #590869 has caused the Debian Bug report #590869, regarding installation-reports: Successful installation: ASUS X5DAF to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#590740: marked as done (install successfull (testing release on amd64))

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #590740 has caused the Debian Bug report #590740, regarding install successfull (testing release on amd64) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#515902: marked as done (installation-reports: d-i 5.0.0 DVD 1 i386 on SL-NV400-L64: Success)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #515902 has caused the Debian Bug report #515902, regarding installation-reports: d-i 5.0.0 DVD 1 i386 on SL-NV400-L64: Success to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#588511: marked as done (installation-reports: Install succeeds)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #588511 has caused the Debian Bug report #588511, regarding installation-reports: Install succeeds to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#570151: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful Installation)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #570151 has caused the Debian Bug report #570151, regarding installation-reports: Successful Installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#559545: marked as done (installation-reports: success report: Thinkpad x61)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #559545 has caused the Debian Bug report #559545, regarding installation-reports: success report: Thinkpad x61 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#546385: marked as done (installation-report: Minor issues with install)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #546385 has caused the Debian Bug report #546385, regarding installation-report: Minor issues with install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#537849: marked as done (Successful installation of Lenny)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #537849 has caused the Debian Bug report #537849, regarding Successful installation of Lenny to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#535197: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful installation on HP Firebird 802)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #535197 has caused the Debian Bug report #535197, regarding installation-reports: Successful installation on HP Firebird 802 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#527768: marked as done (Mostly sucessfull AlphaServer debian/lenny installation)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #527768 has caused the Debian Bug report #527768, regarding Mostly sucessfull AlphaServer debian/lenny installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#517822: marked as done (installation-reports: Blacklisting modules in boot PXE for preseeding install fails)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #517822 has caused the Debian Bug report #517822, regarding installation-reports: Blacklisting modules in boot PXE for preseeding install fails to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#520820: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful Lenny Install)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #520820 has caused the Debian Bug report #520820, regarding installation-reports: Successful Lenny Install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#517128: marked as done (installation-reports: successful installation on HP 9000/L1000)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #517128 has caused the Debian Bug report #517128, regarding installation-reports: successful installation on HP 9000/L1000 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#517261: marked as done (MD5 and SHA1 checksums)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #517261 has caused the Debian Bug report #517261, regarding MD5 and SHA1 checksums to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#515975: marked as done (installation-reports: hpet bug in hp-compact-dc7900-ultra-slim-desktop pc and 82567LM-3 ethernet card didn't found)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #515975 has caused the Debian Bug report #515975, regarding installation-reports: hpet bug in hp-compact-dc7900-ultra-slim-desktop pc and 82567LM-3 ethernet card didn't found to be

Bug#515715: marked as done (installation-reports: d-i 5.0.0 DVD 1 i386 on ASUS Z71A: Success)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #515715 has caused the Debian Bug report #515715, regarding installation-reports: d-i 5.0.0 DVD 1 i386 on ASUS Z71A: Success to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#515639: marked as done (installation-reports: Install on 12" PowerBookG4 (mostly successful))

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #515639 has caused the Debian Bug report #515639, regarding installation-reports: Install on 12" PowerBookG4 (mostly successful) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#514252: marked as done (installation-reports: Successful installation (no problems))

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #514252 has caused the Debian Bug report #514252, regarding installation-reports: Successful installation (no problems) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#513453: marked as done (installation-reports: lenny netinst-RC2 amd64 on Lenovo W500 fails to boot after starting in Vista Ultimate 32bit)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #513453 has caused the Debian Bug report #513453, regarding installation-reports: lenny netinst-RC2 amd64 on Lenovo W500 fails to boot after starting in Vista Ultimate 32bit to be m

Bug#512355: marked as done (installation-report: Graphical Expert Install sucessfully)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #512355 has caused the Debian Bug report #512355, regarding installation-report: Graphical Expert Install sucessfully to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#510236: marked as done (successful installation of amd64 lenny)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #510236 has caused the Debian Bug report #510236, regarding successful installation of amd64 lenny to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#509261: marked as done (installation-report: successful install on samsung nc10)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #509261 has caused the Debian Bug report #509261, regarding installation-report: successful install on samsung nc10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#506372: marked as done (installation-reports: successful install on Dell PowerEdge 2950)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #506372 has caused the Debian Bug report #506372, regarding installation-reports: successful install on Dell PowerEdge 2950 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#505000: marked as done (Transtec Calleo 331: Install OK, volatile not added to sources.list)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #505000 has caused the Debian Bug report #505000, regarding Transtec Calleo 331: Install OK, volatile not added to sources.list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#504914: marked as done (installation-reports: Lenny install succeeded)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #504914 has caused the Debian Bug report #504914, regarding installation-reports: Lenny install succeeded to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#504339: marked as done (installation-reports: Too narrow selection of timezone (based on keyboard and/or language settings))

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #504339 has caused the Debian Bug report #504339, regarding installation-reports: Too narrow selection of timezone (based on keyboard and/or language settings) to be marked as done.

Bug#501801: marked as done (lenny beta2 install on Lenovo ThinkPad T61 without troubles)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501801 has caused the Debian Bug report #501801, regarding lenny beta2 install on Lenovo ThinkPad T61 without troubles to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#501395: marked as done (installation-reports: Debian Lenny installation report)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501395 has caused the Debian Bug report #501395, regarding installation-reports: Debian Lenny installation report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#501332: marked as done (installation-report: Successfull installation on eeepc 901)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501332 has caused the Debian Bug report #501332, regarding installation-report: Successfull installation on eeepc 901 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#501176: marked as done (installation-reports: d-i lenny 20081004 netboot i386 on SL-NV400-L64: Success)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501176 has caused the Debian Bug report #501176, regarding installation-reports: d-i lenny 20081004 netboot i386 on SL-NV400-L64: Success to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#501174: marked as done (installation-report: Install i386 on eeepc 1000H)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501174 has caused the Debian Bug report #501174, regarding installation-report: Install i386 on eeepc 1000H to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#501120: marked as done (Installation report)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501120 has caused the Debian Bug report #501120, regarding Installation report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#501097: marked as done ()

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #501097 has caused the Debian Bug report #501097, regarding to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#500982: marked as done (Asus P5K SE/EPU: ide cdrom drive not found)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #500982 has caused the Debian Bug report #500982, regarding Asus P5K SE/EPU: ide cdrom drive not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#500795: marked as done (Etch SPARC install fails to sync monitor.)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #500795 has caused the Debian Bug report #500795, regarding Etch SPARC install fails to sync monitor. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#500516: marked as done (Lenny distro of Linux magazine september 2008)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #500516 has caused the Debian Bug report #500516, regarding Lenny distro of Linux magazine september 2008 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#500247: marked as done (installation-reports: Installer fails to detect SATA drive, Shuttle SG33G5)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #500247 has caused the Debian Bug report #500247, regarding installation-reports: Installer fails to detect SATA drive, Shuttle SG33G5 to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#500233: marked as done (installation-reports: installation report)

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #500233 has caused the Debian Bug report #500233, regarding installation-reports: installation report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: reassign 589701 to yaboot, forcibly merging 580455 589701

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 589701 yaboot Bug #589701 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Install yaboot on a hard disk - Failed to install boot loader Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'yaboot'. > forcemerge 580455 589701 Bug#580455: l

Bug#587658: Installer Bug Report

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Kent West (we...@acu.edu): > On 09/08/2010 11:29 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > >tags 587658 moreinfo > >thanks > > > >Quoting Kent West (we...@acu.edu): > > > >>Won't recognize the Broadcom BCM57780 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe device > >>(although lspci does). I found this bug: > >> > >>http://

Processed: About "No kernel modules were found" at "Load Installer components from CD" PowerPC businesscard

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 553463 important Bug #553463 [installation-reports] installation-reports: "No kernel modules were found" at "Load Installer components from CD" PowerPC businesscard Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 553463 moreinfo Bug #55

Bug#553463: About "No kernel modules were found" at "Load Installer components from CD" PowerPC businesscard

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 553463 important tags 553463 moreinfo thanks Sorry, Rick, for not coming back to you earlier about this installation report you filed back in Sept 2009. Since you reported this, some things changed quite deeply in D-I, including wrt firmware loading. Would you mind testing a more recen

Processed: About "installation-report: SunBlade 2000: fails to pick up ql2200_fw.bin from usb stick"

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 547175 important Bug #547175 [installation-reports] installation-report: SunBlade 2000: fails to pick up ql2200_fw.bin from usb stick Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 547175 moreinfo Bug #547175 [installation-reports] ins

Bug#547175: About "installation-report: SunBlade 2000: fails to pick up ql2200_fw.bin from usb stick"

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 547175 important tags 547175 moreinfo thanks Sorry, Stephen, for not coming back to you earlier about this installation report you filed back in Sept 2009. Since you reported this, some things changed quite deeply in D-I, including wrt firmware loading. Would you mind testing a more re

Processed: Re: Bug#593013: installation-reports: No common CD-ROM drive detected

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 593013 important Bug #593013 [installation-reports] installation-reports: No common CD-ROM drive detected Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > tags 593013 moreinfo Bug #593013 [installation-reports] installation-reports: No com

Bug#593013: installation-reports: No common CD-ROM drive detected

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 593013 important tags 593013 moreinfo thanks Quoting James B (quantum...@yahoo.com): > Package: installation-reports > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > > > -- Package-specific info: > > Boot method: CD > Image version: debian-testing-sparc-CD-1.iso, 8-9-

Processed: Re: Bug#596083: debian-installer: cfdisk fails to start : libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 590771 596083 Bug#590771: debian-installer: Missing libncurses.so.5 in daily built images (29-Jul-2010 05:06) of debian installer Bug#596083: debian-installer: cfdisk fails to start : libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object fi

Bug#596083: debian-installer: cfdisk fails to start : libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file

2010-09-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
forcemerge 590771 596083 thanks (Impressive mail address) xavier renaut (08/09/2010): > i got : cfdisk: error while loading shared libraries: > libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory Thanks, that's been reported already, merging both bugs. Mraw, KiBi.

Bug#587658: Installer Bug Report

2010-09-08 Thread Kent West
On 09/08/2010 11:29 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: tags 587658 moreinfo thanks Quoting Kent West (we...@acu.edu): Won't recognize the Broadcom BCM57780 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe device (although lspci does). I found this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574888 which indic

Processed: Re: Bug#587658: Installer Bug Report

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 587658 moreinfo Bug #587658 [installation-reports] Installer Bug Report Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 587658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587658 D

Bug#587658: Installer Bug Report

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
tags 587658 moreinfo thanks Quoting Kent West (we...@acu.edu): > Won't recognize the Broadcom BCM57780 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe device (although > lspci does). I found this bug: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574888 > > which indicates the problem will be fixed when the inst

Bug#587658: I'm having this problem too

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting joan (calb...@pangea.org): > My netinst: Debian 5.0.6 (stable / lenny) > My computer: Dell inspiron 570 > lspci output: Ethernet controller, Broadcom Corporation Device 1691 (rev 01) Please try using a *daily build* from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer and choose the *netboot

Processed: Re: Bug#596106: Netinst Bug

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 596106 moreinfo Bug #596106 [installation-reports] Netinst Bug Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 596106: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596106 Debian Bug

Bug#596106: Netinst Bug

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
tags 596106 moreinfo thanks Quoting joan (calb...@pangea.org): > "Could not find kernel image: linux > boot:" Uh? I suspect either a CD burn error or a bad ISO imageor some hardware problem. This image is around for 7 months now..:-) Can you try another image such as netboot and preferrably

Processed: Re: Bug#595914: Re: Re: Bug#595914: Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 595914 linux-2.6 Bug #595914 [installation-reports] Bug-report / installation-report Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'. > retitle 595914 Broadcom BCM57780 Ethernet controller support Bug #595914 [linux-2.6]

Bug#595914: Re: Re: Bug#595914: Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
reassign 595914 linux-2.6 retitle 595914 Broadcom BCM57780 Ethernet controller support thanks Quoting Jomei Ischowieda (l...@poly-tick.de): > Thanks for your kind support. It didn't work either, but the explanation was > really usable for any fool ;) I'd prefer it to be on the Debian website, for

Bug#596106: Netinst Bug

2010-09-08 Thread joan
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 20100908 19:16 (UTM+1) Machine: Dell Inspiron 570 Processor: AMD Athlon II X4 Memory: 6Gb Partitions: Dell original (rescue, oem

Bug#587658: I'm having this problem too

2010-09-08 Thread joan
My netinst: Debian 5.0.6 (stable / lenny) My computer: Dell inspiron 570 lspci output: Ethernet controller, Broadcom Corporation Device 1691 (rev 01) Regards -- Joan Cervan i Andreu http://personal.calbasi.net "El meu paper no és transformar el món ni l'home sinó, potser, el de ser útil, des

Bug#596083: debian-installer: cfdisk fails to start : libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file

2010-09-08 Thread xavier renaut
Package: debian-installer Version: squeeze Alpha1 release Severity: normal Hi, while installing on a pentium 3 the squeeze Alpha1 release, i downloaded the cfdisk module, and when i ran i ~ # cfdisk , i got : cfdisk: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared

Bug#566316: Reproducible

2010-09-08 Thread Ian Jackson
I wrote: > * This happens every time I give it a disk which has the layout I >described in my first report. So I think the steps to reproduce are: * Unpack the image to a hard disk (or file which is going to be your test VM's virtual device). * Set up a local web server containing a pr

Processed: Re: Bug#595749: wfinnish is installed to a Russian-localized system.

2010-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 595749 tasksel Bug #595749 [wfinnish] wfinnish is installed to a Russian-localized system. Bug reassigned from package 'wfinnish' to 'tasksel'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions ispell-fi/0.7-17.3. > thanks Stopping processing her

2010_好久没和你联系了!

2010-09-08 Thread abzoo
ÄãºÃ£¡ ÎÒ¹«Ë¾Œ£˜IÄÊ´úÀíÈ«‡ø¸÷µØ¸÷·N(‡ø¡¢µØ)¶-·¢-Ʊ% Ë°µãµÍÁ®£¬¿É²éԃ»òòž×CáḶ¿î%¡£ ÈçÓÐÐèҪՈíµçÁªÏµ! Çë±£ÁôÒÔÏÂÁªÏµ·½Ê½¡£20 µç»°£º ¡¾ 135 3753 9962¡¿ Q Q£º¡¾1275 209 667 ¡¿ СÕÅ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: Extending libdebian-installer's API to include certainty on subarch detection

2010-09-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > To add a new interface, I think we need to bump to 4.7 > (LIBRARY_VERSION_REVISION=7 in configure.ac) and add a new block in > src/libdebian-installer.ver.  This shouldn't require any > reverse-dependencies to be rebuilt. > > (Otavio, I

Bug#595914: Re: Re: Bug#595914: Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Jomei Ischowieda
Thanks for your kind support. It didn't work either, but the explanation was really usable for any fool ;) I'd prefer it to be on the Debian website, for it would solve a lot of trouble in the first place. I typed a new bugreport with the netboot, but wanted to thank you personally. I know it's

Re: Grub2 installed with wrong boot commands

2010-09-08 Thread Jason Heeris
On 8 September 2010 18:36, Colin Watson wrote: > supposed to set root is a 'search' command later in grub.cfg, which > should be finding the root device by filesystem UUID.  Can you look into > that?  Did your original grub.cfg as installed contain an appropriate > search command? It does, I just

Re: Grub2 installed with wrong boot commands

2010-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:45:00PM +0800, Jason Heeris wrote: > On 8 September 2010 17:35, Colin Watson wrote: > > Something else is wrong then, because partition numbers start from 1 in > > GRUB 2 - 0-based partition numbers no longer work.  Is it possible that > > there's a very old version of G

Re: Extending libdebian-installer's API to include certainty on subarch detection

2010-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:51:20AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > Perfectly. I've reworked my patches to implement these suggestions, here's my > current result: > > === modified file 'include/debian-installer/system/subarch.h' > --- include/debian-installer/system/subarch.h 2005-08-03 09:42

Re: Grub2 installed with wrong boot commands

2010-09-08 Thread Jason Heeris
On 8 September 2010 17:35, Colin Watson wrote: > Something else is wrong then, because partition numbers start from 1 in > GRUB 2 - 0-based partition numbers no longer work.  Is it possible that > there's a very old version of GRUB hanging around in a boot sector > somewhere? I'm pretty certain

Re: Grub2 installed with wrong boot commands

2010-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:12:13PM +0800, Jason Heeris wrote: > Mostly it goes okay, but the grub2 installation is a real pain. The > installer detects the USB install media (FAT16) as the first hard > drive (/dev/sda) and the target (the flash disk) as the second > (/dev/sdb). I tell it *not* to i

Bug#596045: 2nd Bug-report / installation-report

2010-09-08 Thread Jomei Ischowieda
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD - netboot Image version: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/mini.iso Date: 08-Sep-2010, 10:15 Machine: (Acer) emachines E730G-334G32Mnks Processor: Intel Core i3-330M Memory: 4 GB DDR3 Partitions: original (Windows 7 install) on a

linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.41lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: ata-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64-di_1.41lenny8_sparc.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64-di_1.41lenny8_sparc.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64-di_1.41lenny8_sparc.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc

linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.37lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: core-modules-2.6.26-2-s390-di_0.37lenny8_s390.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/core-modules-2.6.26-2-s390-di_0.37lenny8_s390.udeb crypto-core-modules-2.6.26-2-s390-di_0.37lenny8_s390.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto

linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.48lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: affs-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc-di_1.48lenny8_powerpc.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc-di_1.48lenny8_powerpc.udeb affs-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc64-di_1.48lenny8_powerpc.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di

linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.8lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.8lenny8_mipsel.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.8lenny8_mipsel.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt-di_1.8lenny8_mipsel.udeb to main/l

linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.9lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.9lenny8_mips.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.9lenny8_mips.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_1.9lenny8_mips.udeb to main/l/linu

linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.42lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: ata-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny8_ia64.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny8_ia64.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny8_ia64.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.76lenny8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny8_i386.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny8_i386.udeb acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem-di_1.76lenny8_i386.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modu

linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.32lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: ata-modules-2.6.26-2-ixp4xx-di_1.32lenny8_armel.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-ixp4xx-di_1.32lenny8_armel.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-iop32x-di_1.32lenny8_armel.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.

linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.37lenny9_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: ata-modules-2.6.26-2-ixp4xx-di_1.37lenny9_arm.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-ixp4xx-di_1.37lenny9_arm.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-footbridge-di_1.37lenny9_arm.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdro

linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.53lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny8_amd64.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny8_amd64.udeb ata-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny8_amd64.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-mo

linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.37lenny8_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-08 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: ata-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny8_alpha.udeb to main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny8_alpha.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny8_alpha.udeb to main/l/lin

Grub2 installed with wrong boot commands

2010-09-08 Thread Jason Heeris
I've been trying to install Debian Squeeze on a Helios single board computer with 512MB of flash disk space and 256MB RAM. I've been using the daily build of the Squeeze boot.img.gz and netinst ISO to do a USB boot and install. Mostly it goes okay, but the grub2 installation is a real pain. The in