Re: busybox in SVN....

Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): > Hello Christian, > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > I'm sorry but isn't it a little bit ridiculous that busybox, being > > team-maintained, is still kept in people/waldi? > > > > No offense intended for Bastian, a

Bug#600861: [console-setup-mini] Package console-setup-mini needs to be xserver installed?

Marek Straka, le Wed 20 Oct 2010 20:13:45 +0200, a écrit : > Why is Bugreport Nr. 546983 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546983 > not listed under bugreports of console-setup-mini: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=console-setup-mini Err, because it is fixed

Re: Bug#600490: debian-installer: If you choose JP106 key layout, you'll be asked keyboard layout again

Hideki Yamane, le Fri 22 Oct 2010 01:04:19 +0900, a écrit : > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:41:05 +0200 > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I've made keyboard-configuration not use these models any more, and > > simply assume the base model provides the support, which is true since > > xkb-data 1.6 (thus versio

Re: busybox in SVN....

Hello Christian, On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I'm sorry but isn't it a little bit ridiculous that busybox, being > team-maintained, is still kept in people/waldi? > > No offense intended for Bastian, at all, but I would find > more logical to have it either in the t

busybox override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): udhcpc_1.17.1-6_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net. udhcpd_1.17.1-6_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net. Please note that a list of new sectio

busybox_1.17.1-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: busybox-static_1.17.1-6_amd64.deb to main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.17.1-6_amd64.deb busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-6_all.deb to main/b/busybox/busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-6_all.deb busybox-udeb_1.17.1-6_amd64.udeb to main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.17.1-6_amd64.udeb busybox_1.17.1-6.debian.ta

Processing of busybox_1.17.1-6_amd64.changes

busybox_1.17.1-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: busybox_1.17.1-6.dsc busybox_1.17.1-6.debian.tar.gz busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-6_all.deb udhcpc_1.17.1-6_all.deb udhcpd_1.17.1-6_all.deb busybox_1.17.1-6_amd64.deb busybox-static_1.17.1-6_amd64.deb b

Bug#528560: marked as done (debian (lenny) installer via serial console does not support hardware flow control (for serial over lan))

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#528560: fixed in busybox 1:1.17.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #528560, regarding debian (lenny) installer via serial console does not support hardware flow control (for serial over lan) to be marked as

Re: busybox in SVN....

Christian PERRIER, le Thu 21 Oct 2010 17:55:56 +0200, a écrit : > I'm sorry but isn't it a little bit ridiculous that busybox, being > team-maintained, is still kept in people/waldi? > > No offense intended for Bastian, at all, but I would find > more logical to have it either in the trunk (like w

busybox in SVN....

Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@alioth.debian.org): > Author: otavio > Date: Thu Oct 21 14:00:46 2010 > New Revision: 65108 > > Log: > releasing version 1:1.17.1-5. > > Modified: >people/waldi/packages/busybox/debian/changelog I'm sorry but isn't it a little bit ridiculous that busybox, bei

Re: Bug#600490: debian-installer: If you choose JP106 key layout, you'll be asked keyboard layout again

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:41:05 +0200 Samuel Thibault wrote: > I've made keyboard-configuration not use these models any more, and > simply assume the base model provides the support, which is true since > xkb-data 1.6 (thus version dep bump). Does it means jp106 users never got same question twice

busybox_1.17.1-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: busybox-static_1.17.1-5_amd64.deb to main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.17.1-5_amd64.deb busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-5_all.deb to main/b/busybox/busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-5_all.deb busybox-udeb_1.17.1-5_amd64.udeb to main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.17.1-5_amd64.udeb busybox_1.17.1-5.debian.ta

busybox override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): udhcpc_1.17.1-5_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net. udhcpd_1.17.1-5_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net. Please note that a list of new sectio

Bug#599101: marked as done (busybox: execs applets when chrooting)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:48:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#599101: fixed in busybox 1:1.17.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #599101, regarding busybox: execs applets when chrooting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#597510: marked as done (/etc/init.d/udhcpd force-reload uses wrong order: start+stop instead of stop+start)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:48:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#597510: fixed in busybox 1:1.17.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #597510, regarding /etc/init.d/udhcpd force-reload uses wrong order: start+stop instead of stop+start to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#591436: marked as done (busybox-syslogd: initscript prints many error messages)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:48:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#591436: fixed in busybox 1:1.17.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #591436, regarding busybox-syslogd: initscript prints many error messages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processing of busybox_1.17.1-5_amd64.changes

busybox_1.17.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: busybox_1.17.1-5.dsc busybox_1.17.1-5.debian.tar.gz busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-5_all.deb udhcpc_1.17.1-5_all.deb udhcpd_1.17.1-5_all.deb busybox_1.17.1-5_amd64.deb busybox-static_1.17.1-5_amd64.deb b

tasksel_2.84_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: task-overrides_2.84_all.tar.gz byhand tasksel-data_2.84_all.deb to main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.84_all.deb tasksel_2.84.dsc to main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.84.dsc tasksel_2.84.tar.gz to main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.84.tar.gz tasksel_2.84_all.deb to main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.84_all.deb

Processing of tasksel_2.84_amd64.changes

tasksel_2.84_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.84.dsc tasksel_2.84.tar.gz tasksel_2.84_all.deb tasksel-data_2.84_all.deb task-overrides_2.84_all.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To

Bug#600107: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin program templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600107: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600107, regarding tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin program templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#600639: marked as done (tasksel: [l10n:ca] Updated Catalan tasks translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600639: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600639, regarding tasksel: [l10n:ca] Updated Catalan tasks translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#600106: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian program templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600106: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600106, regarding tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian program templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#600105: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600105: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600105, regarding tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin debconf templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#600104: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600104: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600104, regarding tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian debconf templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#600103: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin tasks templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600103: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600103, regarding tasksel: [INTL:s...@latin] Serbian Latin tasks templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#600101: marked as done (tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian tasks templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600101: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #600101, regarding tasksel: [INTL:sr] Serbian tasks templates translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#596730: marked as done (tasksel KDE does not install OpenOffice/KDE-integration)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#596730: fixed in tasksel 2.84 has caused the Debian Bug report #596730, regarding tasksel KDE does not install OpenOffice/KDE-integration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Re: GRUB2 doesn’t is installed on SATA HD

Hello, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote: ... > When I choose to install grub-pc on SATA HD and click "Continue", > installer tell me that I *don't" had choose any drive to install > grub-pc! I try to install it on the first partition of SATA HD and got > the same result. I choo

Processed: blank

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package localechooser Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'localechooser' Limit currently set to 'package':'localechooser' > severity 600229 normal Bug #600229 [localechooser] installer does not ask for keyboard layou

Processed (with 2 errors): blank

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package localechooser Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'localechooser' Limit currently set to 'package':'localechooser' > reopen 600229 Bug #600229 [localechooser] debian-installer: improve support for English-spe

Bug#600762: images including non-free firmware are available

See the contents of http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/squeeze_d-i/i386/iso-cd/ -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com < sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to find a post-it note stuck to

win32-loader_0.6.20_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: win32-loader_0.6.20.dsc to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.20.dsc win32-loader_0.6.20.tar.bz2 to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.20.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.6.20_all.deb to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.20_all.deb Override entries for your package: win32-loader_0

Bug#600640: marked as done (win32-loader: [l10n] Updated Catalan translation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:17:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#600640: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #600640, regarding win32-loader: [l10n] Updated Catalan translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processing of win32-loader_0.6.20_i386.changes

win32-loader_0.6.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: win32-loader_0.6.20.dsc win32-loader_0.6.20.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.6.20_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo

Processing of win32-loader_0.6.20_i386.changes

win32-loader_0.6.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: win32-loader_0.6.20.dsc win32-loader_0.6.20.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.6.20_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#600762: marked as done (debian-installer: testing d-i missing e100 firmware)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:34:54 +0200 with message-id <20101021043453.ga3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> and subject line Re: Bug#600762: debian-installer: testing d-i missing e100 firmware has caused the Debian Bug report #600762, regarding debian-installer: testing d-i missing e100