Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Last night, my daily build of the installation-guide was apparently
> failing. I haven't investigated this, though.
This was apparently a transient error. This night's build succeeded.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Stephane Ascoet (stephane.asc...@ac-orleans-tours.fr):
> Christian PERRIER a écrit :
>
> >This is by design. It is assumed that, when something goes wrong, some
> >more actions might be needed before the normal process resumes. So,
> But what about the questions that disapears?
These que
On 01/03/2011 04:43:43 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 04:27:46 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 01/03/2011 02:31:51 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Quoting Karl O. Pinc (k...@meme.com):
> > >
> > > > Many users expect that their system have software that's
> > > > not in the stock Debian
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Dec 09 00:12 bui...@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Dec 09
cdebconf-terminal_0.13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-terminal_0.13.dsc
cdebconf-terminal_0.13.tar.gz
cdebconf-gtk-terminal_0.13_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-newt-terminal_0.13_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
cdebconf-entropy_0.20_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.20.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.20.tar.gz
cdebconf-text-entropy_0.20_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.20_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk-entropy_0.20_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your De
Package: live-installer
While testing an install of squeeze_live_beta2 I was unable to
continue without a bootloader. When selecting "Continue without boot
loader" or going directly to "Finish the installation" then selecting
"Continue without boot loader" you are brought back to the menu. You
can
Hi,
same as #606950 - linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: USB drives not
recognized anymore (sd_mod: Unknown symbol
blk_queue_physical_block_size_fixed) ?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606950
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
--
On 01/03/2011 04:27:46 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 02:31:51 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Karl O. Pinc (k...@meme.com):
> >
> > > Many users expect that their system have software that's
> > > not in the stock Debian stable repos.
> >
> > So, indeed, thanks in advance for
On 01/03/2011 02:31:51 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Karl O. Pinc (k...@meme.com):
>
> > Many users expect that their system have software that's
> > not in the stock Debian stable repos.
> > Chapter 8, next steps,
> > should either include the content of or point users
> > toward a res
reassign to apt-setup as no generator is adding live cds as apt source?
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Just a quick note to indicate that I'm working on this at the moment.
It's... not trivial, but enough of the pieces should be in place that the
job isn't insanely difficult.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Quoting Karl O. Pinc (k...@meme.com):
> Many users expect that their system have software that's
> not in the stock Debian stable repos. Examples include newer
> versions of major desktop packages found in backports,
> various programs supporting different sorts of multi-media
> display, and so f
Hello.
There is a script debian-installer-trunk/packages/apt-setup/generators
is this 01setup:
# add old file as comments
sed 's/^/# /' < $ROOT/etc/apt/sources.list | sed 's/^# # */# /' > $file
Obviously going to comment everything in sources.list regardless of whether a
network is configured
Jose Luis Zabalza wrote:
>
> Just on http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00023.html
>
> joseangon say a possible cause for this bug. If installer configure the
> network, the installation is OK. In my case, all the test were performed
> without network. If I setup the local network, wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607967 + patch
Bug #607967 [src:cdebconf-terminal] cdebconf-terminal: FTBFS on all
architectures (missing aclocal)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607967: http://bugs.debi
I was monitoring /target/apt/sources.list and it changes (the lines
are commented) between this points of installation.
I guest that the sources.list file is writen incorrectly (the lines
are commented) by a script executed on this section.
pciutils package is on pool directory.
Package: installation-guide
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Many users expect that their system have software that's
not in the stock Debian stable repos. Examples include newer
versions of major desktop packages found in backports,
various programs supporting different sorts of multi-media
display, and
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:38:45 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Will a udeb in experimental satisfy the build system (pbuilder with
> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-experimental)? And is it
> possible to give a local udeb as dependency instead of waiting until the
> NEW queue has been pro
Package: installation-reports
Problem:
The SCSI disk module sd_mod could not be loaded with error
sd_mod: Unknown symbol blk_queue_physical_block_size_fixed
Hence no /dev/sd* appear and the installer does not find any partitions!
amd64-installer:
Boot method:
Image version: netboot.tar.gz fro
Snapshot i386
LIVE/NETINST Binary 20110103-10:39]/ frozen main
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot i386
LIVE/NETINST Binary 20110103-10:39]/ squeeze main
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot i386
LIVE/NETINST Binary 20110103-10:39]/ stable
tags 584558 + confirmed
thanks
Hello,
I installed squeeze from cdrom (d-i installer beta2) i386 with LVM.
On one machine (IBM x306) on a plain sata drive no problem but on
another on (IBM x345) with SCSI and RAID1 I get the described problem
from http://bugs.debian.org/584558 and have to manually
Just on http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00023.html
joseangon say a possible cause for this bug. If installer configure the
network, the installation is OK. In my case, all the test were performed
without network. If I setup the local network, with the same usb-stick, the
installatio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 603942 1.57
Bug #603942 [grub-installer] installation-report: Grub installed to wrong disk
Bug Marked as found in versions grub-installer/1.57; no longer marked as fixed
in versions grub-installer/1.57.
> merge 568529 603942
Bug#568529: ove
severity 568529 serious
tags 568529 - moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
now we have five different people reporting that bug. Most of them set a
severity of serious or above.
Therefore I increased the severity: Makes package unfit for release in my
opinion.
Some more additional information from the insta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 568529 serious
Bug #568529 [grub-installer] overwrites MBR of installation medium
Bug #579519 [grub-installer] grub-installer - Overwrites bootloaders on
different device
Bug #589823 [grub-installer] debian-installer (squeeze alpha): Wri
found 603942 1.57
merge 568529 603942
thanks
Hello Christian Perrier,
I found this bug still beeing present in beta2 installer using grub-installer
1.57 (See #605562).
Bug 603942 seems to be another duplicate of #568529, so I merge them.
Best Regards
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 603942 serious
Bug #603942 [grub-installer] installation-report: Grub installed to wrong disk
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'
> merge 568529 603942
Bug#568529: overwrites MBR of installation medium
Bug#603942: installation-repo
On 03/01/2011 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 02:21:24 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> > Is this due to the fact, that no libgcrypt11-udeb package is available
> > at the debian archive yet? It currently sits in NEW, awaiting approval.
>
> Yes.
Will a udeb in experimental satisfy
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 02:21:24 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Is this due to the fact, that no libgcrypt11-udeb package is available
> at the debian archive yet? It currently sits in NEW, awaiting approval.
Yes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
30 matches
Mail list logo
