Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Attempt to file this bug report using Reportbug.
It reports the above packages missing for graphics display
use under GNOME Classic display manager.
* What exactly did you do (or
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
wheezy install alpha 1 using netinst. wifi interface recognized
and WPE secure network used to install wheezy alpha 1.
Upon completion without
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20120712
Severity: serious
Justification: file overwrite conflicts
Hi,
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-arch and
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-arch are not co-installable because they
ship the same files, but don#t have corresponding conflicts.
Since
Le mardi, 24 juillet 2012 13.17:10, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-arch and
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-arch are not co-installable because they
ship the same files, but don#t have corresponding conflicts.
Indeed, thanks for your report.
Since they already provide
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Le mardi, 24 juillet 2012 13.17:10, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-arch and
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-arch are not co-installable because they
ship the same files, but don#t have corresponding conflicts.
Indeed, thanks
reassign 682606 gdm3
thanks
Quoting chuck adams (chuck.adams.k...@gmail.com):
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Attempt to file this bug report using Reportbug.
It reports the above packages missing for
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
reassign 682606 gdm3
thanks
This wasn't actually done. I originally thought that you were saying
that GDM was missing some packages beforeI noticed you mentioned
reportbug.
So, no reassign should indeed happen
Quoting chuck adams
I confirm that a fresh wheezy install don't have the correct keymap at
boot time. Unfortunately, I was less lucky than the OP and I had to
manually fix two separate issues to get rid of this problem.
Apparently both problems come from initramfs-tools, so perhaps this
bugreport should be
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 13:38:00 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
That, or release-number-specify the paths; I'm not yet decided [0,1].
Opinions?
Versioning the paths seems best, I think.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 682608 normal
Bug #682608 [installation-reports] installation-reports: wireless failure upon
boot after install using new netinst via wifi -- wheezy 64-bit
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 23:30:12 -0700, chuck adams wrote:
wheezy install alpha 1 using netinst. wifi interface recognized
and WPE secure network used to install wheezy alpha 1.
Upon completion without error and when reboot the wireless
interface was not completely recognized. The dual
11 matches
Mail list logo
