On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 23:37:14 +0200, i...@fs-driver.org wrote:
Hello,
Unfortunately we have the situation that the Debian project produces
unbootable IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy images for months.
The boot-load-size at the El-Torito header is wrong. Debian bug#678883.
Please could someone
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.5/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.5-amd64-ne
tinst.iso
Date: 2012-07-27
Machine: Laptop HP 635
Processor: AMD E-450 1,65GHz
Memory: 8GB
Partitions:
/dev/sda1 ext4 1921036 254848 1568604 14% /
tmpfs
On 31-07-2012 11:20, Leroy Baum wrote:
[...]
After a successful installation Wheezy refuses to boot. After GRUB I get
graphical“snow” and graphical errors.
[...]
Can you can use the installation CD to boot into rescue mode and then
install the package linux-firmware-nonfree [1] and
Hi,
GRUB2 supports boot partitions on a lvm volume. LILO too, if I'm not
mistaken. Why then a boot partition is created on bare metal by
default by the d-i? Will you welcome a patch that makes boot partition
to be on a lvm volume by default?
Thanks,
Arokux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le mardi, 31 juillet 2012 15.05:02, Arokux B. a écrit :
Hi,
GRUB2 supports boot partitions on a lvm volume. LILO too, if I'm not
mistaken. Why then a boot partition is created on bare metal by
default by the d-i? Will you welcome a patch that makes boot partition
to be on a lvm volume by
On 07/30/2012 08:19 PM, Bob Bib wrote:
please don't force the gdm3 dependency;
I have had some discussion this morning with the Debian lxde maintainers and we
agree the gdm3
dependency explosion (a fairly recent thing, looking at gdm3's Debian
changelog) renders it much
less desirable to use
On 07/31/2012 11:42 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
While my brief testing of lightdm indicates it is a possible candidate, but
there is also slim to
consider. We're considering the merits of each before requesting a change to
task-lxde-desktop.
We have concluded our testing and discussion and
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:20:41 +0200, Leroy Baum wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.5/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.5-amd64-ne
tinst.iso
Date: 2012-07-27
This is squeeze, not wheezy? You probably need the
2012-07-31 20:45, Ben Armstrong skrev:
Also, we would be following where the rest of the lemmings are going
(task-xfce-desktop uses it too, and so does the lubuntu project) so if we've
chosen badly, at least
we'll be in good company. :p
Even regular Ubuntu uses lightdm:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the EFI BoF [1] last week
(9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team,
the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed
it. I've also attached the Gobby
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:40:25PM -0600, Paul Wise wrote:
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the EFI BoF [1] last week
(9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team,
the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed
it. I've also attached the
Hi
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 02:54:55PM +0300, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:54:37PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FWIW: If you want to push those changes
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:59:33PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Just put up updated details at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/2012-07-30/
Gnome and KDE are looking closer, but still not there yet. Are we
going to get dpkg xz support in the archive soon?
Also: something weird
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 683349 www.debian.org
Bug #683349 [task-lxde-desktop] task-lxde-desktop: very experimental outdated
'task-lxde-desktop' package version?
Bug reassigned from package 'task-lxde-desktop' to 'www.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in
reassign 683349 www.debian.org
thanks
According to this:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages
the most likely pseudo-package is 'www.debian.org'.
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Aug 01 00:30 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log
* FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Aug 01
16 matches
Mail list logo
