Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Nov 04 00:20 buildd@barber build_hd-media
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media.log
* FAILED BUILD: i386 Nov 04 00:17 buildd@biber build_hd-media
Philipp Kern (03/11/2012):
> are there plans on the dpkg side to support other compression
> methods for the control.tar in .deb files? Some of the d-i udebs
> have large debconf templates which are only compressed with gzip,
> while xz would yield smaller udebs.
That would be lovely to have, at
Your message dated Sun, 4 Nov 2012 00:15:30 +0100
with message-id <20121104001530.0cbd7a26.li...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line [wheezy-alpha1] unable to install grub2 or lilo onto an btrfs
filesystem
has caused the Debian Bug report #673195,
regarding [wheezy-alpha1] unable to install grub2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 692168 lilo
Bug #692168 [installation-reports] [d-i beta3 btrfs] Unable to install lilo or
grub, when / partition is btrfs
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'lilo'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #692
> Initially it fails at the iso-scan because it doesn't like
> something about /dev/sda2 (hangs) on the computer I am
> installing on.
Is sda2 an extended partition?
Do you need hardware reset to kill following command?
mount -t auto -o ro /dev/sda2 /mnt
If answer is yes to both questions, 691
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:48:31 +0100
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.101
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Philipp Kern
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:17:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690868: fixed in netcfg 1.101
has caused the Debian Bug report #690868,
regarding Unable to proceed without setting a default gateway ("Unreachable
gateway" error)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
netcfg_1.101_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.101.dsc
netcfg_1.101.tar.gz
netcfg_1.101_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.101_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hi,
are there plans on the dpkg side to support other compression methods
for the control.tar in .deb files? Some of the d-i udebs have large
debconf templates which are only compressed with gzip, while xz would
yield smaller udebs.
Case in point:
% ls -l netcfg_1.101_amd64.udeb
-rw-r--r-- 1 pke
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:44:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Philipp Kern [2012-10-03 17:34]:
> > The preseed option name changed. That's on the to-do list for the next
> > beta/RC. Is use_dhcp in there? If not it might be that IP
> > configuration still triggers DHCP autoconfiguration
Hello,
The patch is mergeable at the moment, I've pushed the changes to
people/sorina/write_config branch [1], I didn't modify the
feature/write_config, maybe I should have.
In order to build the package, I disabled the
nc_v6_interface_configured, which failed for some reason (this also
happened
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 690868 + pending
Bug #690868 [netcfg] Unable to proceed without setting a default gateway
("Unreachable gateway" error)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690868: http://bug
tag 690868 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:19:05PM +0200, Marcin Engelmann wrote:
> It is not possible to proceed with wheezy installation without setting
> a default gateway. I'm getting always "Unreachable gateway" error.
>
> Tried both interactive installer and preseed (setting
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/11/12 11:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I guess you didn't see this as you weren't cc'd:
>
> willem kuyn (14/10/2012):
>> I tried to reproduce the bug with
>> debian-wheezy-DI-b2-amd64-netinst.iso in a virtual machine.
>>
>>
I'm more in the line of using the capitalized form ("Ext2") simply because
the name of a filesystem is a proper noun and thus has to respect the
orthographic rules of those that in Spanish have to be written with the
first letter capitalized.
*But* according to the second of Santiago's claims (
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:29:55 +0100
with message-id <201211031229.55601.o...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681610: Installation was successfully with Beta3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681610,
regarding Installation fails during loading firmware
to be marked as done.
This
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: boot cdrom with net install version of ISO for installer 7, beta
3, sparc
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta3/sparc/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b3-sparc-netinst.iso
Date: Nov 2, 2012
Machine: Sun Ultra 2
Processor: 2 x 400 M
Hello,
The installation was successfully with Beta3.
Please close this bug report.
Best regards
Bernhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5094e6ba.2030
Hello,
The installation with Beta 3 was successfully now.
Please close this bug report.
Best regards
Bernhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5094e616
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I am unsure, what is the reason here, since I am trying to install into
> the MBR, so the type of the root filesystem should be of no interest?
I did another test installation, with another partitioning scheme:
/dev/sda1 / btrfs
/dev/sda2
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Nov 03 00:20 buildd@barber build_hd-media
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/bui
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 08:21:36 +0100
with message-id <20121103072136.gs5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692114: [d-i beta3] installation report: installing
from xfce-CD1 successful
has caused the Debian Bug report #692114,
regarding [d-i beta3] installation re
22 matches
Mail list logo
