Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> Patch for this actually just a diff limited to ./grub-installer from:
>
> $ git revert a070f516 99389d59 926cee22
Agreed from my side. I guess we now just need Cyril's ACK to apply in
git and probably buildunless something else is needed in
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:10:41 +0100
with message-id <20130112071041.gl5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697890: installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin
has caused the Debian Bug report #697890,
regarding installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:12:06 +0100
with message-id <20130112071206.gm5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697953: installation report (successful)
has caused the Debian Bug report #697953,
regarding installation report (successful)
to be marked as done.
This me
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10
On Fri 11 Jan 2013 at 15:36:27 +0100, jswmb01x wrote:
> Then I started the xfce "network manager" (parameters -> network
> connections), filled in required information and wanted to check the
> status with iwconfig.
>
> Could only find this :
>
> root?
> root? find / -xdev -iname *iwconfig*
> /
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 15:36 +0100, jswmb01x wrote:
> Yes, indeed !
>
> It's about wheezy-xfce (testing - build cd binay-1 20121217-05:10).
>
> During installation I got a ~"missing rt28xx" message and was asked to
> provide a "floppy" with the firmware. Answered "no" and proceeded with
> insta
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cdrom
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta4/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: december, the 28th, 2012
Machine: DELL Latitude E6400
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600@
Memory:
Partitions:
roo
Yes, indeed !
It's about wheezy-xfce (testing - build cd binay-1 20121217-05:10).
During installation I got a ~"missing rt28xx" message and was asked to provide
a "floppy" with the firmware. Answered "no" and proceeded with installation. As
such the installation is OK, but it looks there are m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 681227 + patch
Bug #681227 [grub-installer] does not validate free-form input
Added tag(s) patch.
> block 651720 by 681227
Bug #651720 {Done: Wouter Verhelst } [src:grub-installer]
new ZFS install on / fails if /boot isn't ZFS
651720 was not
tags 681227 + patch
block 651720 by 681227
# kFreeBSD bugfix couldn't enter wheezy yet due to regressions
thanks
Hi,
On 07/01/13 19:56, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> What to do with the workaround added by Wouter in grub-installer/1.84?
>
> The workaround tried to eliminate the possibility of invali
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> I think we should include this change in wheezy.
+1...unless Cyril really wants us to be feature-frozen during the RC
stage, which would be understandable.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I've just committed this change to finish-install.git, inspired by
comments in https://factorable.net/weakkeys12.extended.pdf. (At least
for systems using sysvinit, this is the only change that I can readily
see needs to be made to Debian based on that paper.) I can't
immediately point to a vulne
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> > I suspect e8ae8876bcea30cc45bcba25ed1e9ea2a317aff0 to be safe and a
> > good idea.I have however no idea for
> > 1ec13c5a378076c10988237972d4df0f1eefafd3, given my own C-fu..:-)
>
> It made the jenkins build stable and was non-intrusive enough t
This was found on Fedora 18.
Both os-prober and linux-boot-prober do not support root, boot, or
root+boot on a btrfs subvolume.
The attached patch corrects that. It supplies information such that
grub2, with an additional small patch, will not handle btrfs in
30_os-prober.
I have attached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 697868 tasksel
Bug #697868 [debian-cd] debian-cd: cd 1 should install a network configuration
tool
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-cd' to 'tasksel'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-cd/3.1.10.
Ignoring request to alter fi
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Cd "debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso".
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta4/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Friday 11 January 2013.
Machine: Tested on VirtualBox and a Dell Optiplex 960 and a Del
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 681994 + pending
Bug #681994 [discover] discover-config --list doesn't work
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 533688 + pending
Bug #533688 [discover] (discover_2.1.2-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated
config.{sub,guess}
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stop
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:16:53 +0100
Source: discover-data
Binary: discover-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2013.01.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Petter Rei
discover-data_2.2013.01.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_2.2013.01.11.dsc
discover-data_2.2013.01.11.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2013.01.11_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUB
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:32:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#697839: fixed in discover-data 2.2013.01.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #697839,
regarding discover-data: usb 04b4:fd1[0123] is package sispmctl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
hi,
I'm still lacking a bit behind. My image now boots as CD-ROM Legacy
and CR-ROM EFI but not as USB EFI (which works with vanillia netinst
b4).
Here is my xorriso:
xorriso -as mkisofs -r -J -joliet-long -l -cache-inodes \
-isohybrid-mbr /usr/lib/syslinux/isohdpfx.bin -partition_offset 16 \
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:12:49AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Do you target wheezy for the last 2 commits your made in cdrom
> -checker?
There's no pressing urgency to have them in wheezy, but they're also
entirely harmless and can ride along with translation updates or
whatever without cau
[Helmut Grohne]
> Package: discover-data
> Version: 2.2013.01.09
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Petter Reinholdtsen called for updates to discover-data on planet.d.o.
> So I can provide some IDs as well.
Great. :)
> The sispmctl package is used to switch a power socket. The current
> version of the pa
Please unsubscribe..
Thank you.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Trek wrote:
> Package: partman-crypto
> Version: 56
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that using udev persistent device naming in /etc/crypttab
> would be useful to prevent some dangerous situation, like the
> following one.
>
> I have a 3 disk
Christian PERRIER, le Fri 11 Jan 2013 07:12:49 +0100, a écrit :
> Hi Colin,
>
> Do you target wheezy for the last 2 commits your made in cdrom
> -checker?
>
> I suspect e8ae8876bcea30cc45bcba25ed1e9ea2a317aff0 to be safe and a
> good idea.I have however no idea for
> 1ec13c5a378076c1098823797
Package: partman-crypto
Version: 56
Hi,
I think that using udev persistent device naming in /etc/crypttab
would be useful to prevent some dangerous situation, like the
following one.
I have a 3 disks setup with the first two in raid mode and the third as
archive. The swap partitions are encrypte
Hi Colin,
Do you target wheezy for the last 2 commits your made in cdrom
-checker?
I suspect e8ae8876bcea30cc45bcba25ed1e9ea2a317aff0 to be safe and a
good idea.I have however no idea for
1ec13c5a378076c10988237972d4df0f1eefafd3, given my own C-fu..:-)
commit 1ec13c5a378076c10988237972d4df0
27 matches
Mail list logo
