On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:46:06PM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Mar 3, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Gah. Looking further, at the moment I don't see how (if at all) the
powerpc boot stuff passes through any of the kernel boot
Is this a known problem? Is it related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689722, which is
supposed to have been resolved?
Is there a workaround so that I can boot my machine? Or a version of
the installer that does not lead to this problem? Or a way of using the
installer?
Package: debian-installer-launcher
Version: 14
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
Boot
http://live.debian.net/cdimage/release/next/i386/iso-hybrid/debian-wheezy-live-rc1-i386-lxde-desktop.iso
Download and install debian-installer-launcher 14, as this image only
contains 13 which does not
John Talbut j...@dpets.co.uk (05/03/2013):
Is this a known problem? Is it related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689722, which is
supposed to have been resolved?
I don't think so.
Is there a workaround so that I can boot my machine? Or a version
of the installer that
Salut Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Thierry cont...@sekil.fr (03/03/2013):
Indeed, maybe it should be documented.
might be a job for Samuel?
Moreover, what is disturbing is that the parameter seams to be valid
in a first time (Release files are downloaded successfully). It
fails very lately at the end
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (03/03/2013):
Sorry, wrong terminology. Please consider approving a udeb-unblock
for isc-dhcp.
unblock-udeb even.
Done in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696671#67
Also, you might have seen I was cc'd in:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (05/03/2013):
It probably needs a pre-approval by Cyril.
I'm not deeply worried about this specific bug (adding iw to
desktop and laptop) because we can release wheezy without that fix.
I'm more worried about the network-manager-gnome addition to the
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (04/02/2013):
I've now tested the attached patch on kfreebsd-amd64, and it does fix
the problem, which I could reproduce before only in these specific
circumstances: […]
* only in the GTK installer (netboot-9/gtk or cdrom/gtk; kfreebsd-i386
doesn't
On 05/03/13 20:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Want me to commit your patch to git, and upload that?
Yes, please! I almost forgot about this...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 05/03/13 20:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If the changelog message looks OK to you, I'll upload that later
tonight.
Yep, it makes sense. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Thanks for the summary, and sorry for the lag.
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (18/02/2013):
yaboot-installer:
- need more review.
I'll try and do that soonish.
debian-installer-netboot-images:
- wait RC1 release, then upload
-- I have a ready upload
I guess that's OK.
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:17:39 +
with message-id e1uczex-0001kb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#699704: fixed in partman-base 164
has caused the Debian Bug report #699704,
regarding partman: Please don't load_extra on non-Linux
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Raphaël Hertzog hert...@debian.org (04/03/2013):
Package: apt-setup
Version: 0.77
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
apt-setup keep the cdrom: entries in sources.list unless the cdrom is a
netinst. More ofthen than not, those cdrom entries are not desired:
- ISO images to install virtual
partman-base_164_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_164.dsc
partman-base_164.tar.gz
partman-base_164_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_164_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (05/03/2013):
efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from
3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64
netboot.
That one is slightly annoying… I guess we could add that to the d-i
errata page and point people there when
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:05:41 +0100
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 164
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:32:32 +
with message-id e1ucztm-0003ri...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#701884: fixed in ifupdown 0.7.40
has caused the Debian Bug report #701884,
regarding kfreebsd: unknown method 'inet6 auto'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Unless I'm missing something obvious, switching to “architecture: any”
for some tasks should be OK.
Shall I upload with the attached patches applied ?
Cheers,
--
Charles
From 92aea904ba8993ad20da026dbebd1dd67469252d Mon
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: ttf-cjk-comp...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 since it improves some glyph lacks
in Japanese, Korean and Chinese language with graphical installer.
--
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I just installed a new laptop with the Debian installer rc1.
I put the netinst img raw on a usbkey and boot from it.
First, I boot with the legacy BIOS. Here, the installer works
as always. I can access (with Alt-Fx) to two more consoles
(F2 and F3) and
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky build_generic
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390x/daily/build_generic.log
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky
21 matches
Mail list logo
