On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:31:14AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Btw, I am not sure how important choose-mirror is, but it didn't migrate
> last night (AFAICT it is built, just missing a signature + upload on ia64).
Apr 8 06:41:50 buildd-uploader[14181]: Set to Uploaded(sid): choose-mirror_2.45
06.04.2013 16:02, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 06.04.2013 12:56, Guido Trotter wrote:
>>> Package: busybox-static
>>>
>>> I know that acpid was disabled on purpose, but would it be possible to
>>> reenable it? It is useful on VMs running with bu
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:25:20 +0200
Source: installation-guide
Binary: installation-guide-amd64 installation-guide-armel
installation-guide-armhf installation-guide-i386 installation-guide-ia64
installation-guide-kfreebsd-a
Your message dated Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:03:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604134: fixed in installation-guide 20130408
has caused the Debian Bug report #604134,
regarding partman-base: Makes MacOS 9 incompatible partition table
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
installation-guide_20130408_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-guide_20130408.dsc
installation-guide_20130408.tar.gz
installation-guide-amd64_20130408_all.deb
installation-guide-armel_20130408_all.deb
installation-guide-armhf_20130408_all.d
On 2013-04-08 02:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Updated summary:
>
> Cyril Brulebois (07/04/2013):
>> Cyril Brulebois (06/04/2013):
>>> Things I'd like to see merged:
>>> - netcfg (preseed bug -- fixed in git -- and iw installation); awaiting
>>>some bits of review for the wireless-* settings
I'm pinging this bug, as we're getting seriously out of time.
Now, I guess, we should either let the whole thing go (it has
already been unblocked for, only d-i block remains), or mark
the relevant bugs as non-RC for wheezy.
Thanks,
/mjt
25.03.2013 15:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Let me start f
1. The auto alias doesn't work. auto=true does work. In fact, the
installation guide has contradictory saying on this issue.
http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apbs02.html, B.2. Using
preseeding, has examples with only auto, without a value. And
further down that page, it is writt
Updated summary:
Cyril Brulebois (07/04/2013):
> Cyril Brulebois (06/04/2013):
> > Things I'd like to see merged:
> > - netcfg (preseed bug -- fixed in git -- and iw installation); awaiting
> >some bits of review for the wireless-* settings part. Phil, maybe?
RMs, please unblock/urgent the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 704744 debootstrap
Bug #704744 [pbuilder] pbuilder: umounts /{dev,run}/shm of the *host* system
Bug reassigned from package 'pbuilder' to 'debootstrap'.
No longer marked as found in versions pbuilder/0.215.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
martin f krafft (08/04/2013):
> I am genuinely interested in the reasons for the current design. You
> will note that this thread is highly focused.
“Bug#704931: chroot_cleanup should not unmount /proc” wasn't?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:00:45 +0200
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.108
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Philipp Kern
D
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2013.04.07.2358 +0200]:
> #704931 wasn't the right place, so you needed to make more noise
> on this list, where bug traffic lands already? (You supposedly
> know the latter already since you're setting MFT to the list,
> right?)
I am genuinely interested in the reaso
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#697890: fixed in netcfg 1.108
has caused the Debian Bug report #697890,
regarding Please install iw on systems with wireless harware.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#703747: fixed in netcfg 1.108
has caused the Debian Bug report #703747,
regarding netcfg: preseed netcfg: confusion or regression about disable_dhcp,
disable_autoconfig and use_autoconfig
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688273: fixed in netcfg 1.108
has caused the Debian Bug report #688273,
regarding Preseed netcfg/use_autoconfig and netcfg/disable_dhcp doesn't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
martin f krafft (07/04/2013):
> Hello,
>
> I found that during a preseeded wheezy install, /target/proc gets
> mounted and umounted more than 20 times (caused by chroot_setup and
> chroot_cleanup)
>
> Why?
>
> Why isn't /target/proc (and /target/sys) mounted after the
> /target-filesystem is mo
Hello,
I found that during a preseeded wheezy install, /target/proc gets
mounted and umounted more than 20 times (caused by chroot_setup and
chroot_cleanup)
Why?
Why isn't /target/proc (and /target/sys) mounted after the
/target-filesystem is mounted and unmounted before /target gets
unmounted?
martin f krafft (07/04/2013):
> So there is a "dance" being performed for no apparent reason, and
> you prefer to hack a fix into grub-installer rather than to fix the
> root's cause?
d-i is modular, things might be done, then undone; presumably so that
they can be done again later. Not really su
Hello,
martin f krafft, le Sun 07 Apr 2013 06:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> As far as I can tell, d-i has all the information, and even leaving
> a fully-commented pressed.cfg file in /var/log/installer after the
> installation should be doable.
Did you read section B.3. "Creating a preconfiguration f
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2013.04.07.2257 +0200]:
> AFAICT you're the only one having such an issue with the
> mount/umount dance (it might be suboptimal as far as
> “performances” are concerned, but that's certainly not serious);
> having that issue with grub-installer, which already got
> a f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 704931 normal
Bug #704931 [src:debian-installer-utils] chroot_cleanup should not unmount /proc
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 704931 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #704931 [src:debian-installer-utils] chroot_cleanup should not unmount /proc
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
704931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: severity -1 normal
martin f krafft (07/04/2013):
> Package: src:debian-installer-utils
> Severity: serious
>
> For a reason unknown to me, helpers like in-target and apt-install,
> by way of chroot_setup and chroot_cleanup, might actually cause
> /target/proc to be unmounted. This then
Package: src:debian-installer-utils
Severity: serious
For a reason unknown to me, helpers like in-target and apt-install,
by way of chroot_setup and chroot_cleanup, might actually cause
/target/proc to be unmounted. This then breaks grub-install.
Arguably, commit 795bfde of grub-installer hacks ar
netcfg_1.108_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.108.dsc
netcfg_1.108.tar.gz
netcfg_1.108_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.108_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:50:26PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (06/04/2013):
> > Things I'd like to see merged:
> > - netcfg (preseed bug -- fixed in git -- and iw installation); awaiting
> >some bits of review for the wireless-* settings part. Phil, maybe?
I pushed the p
Brian Potkin (07/04/2013):
> On Sun 07 Apr 2013 at 06:07:37 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> >
> > > > 1) The WLAN password is displayed on screen. User account passwords are
> > > > not displayed on screen, so presumably it is a bug for WLAN pa
sön 2013-04-07 klockan 14:54 +0100 skrev Brian Potkin:
> On Sun 07 Apr 2013 at 06:07:37 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> >
> > > > 1) The WLAN password is displayed on screen. User account passwords are
> > > > not displayed on screen, so presuma
Hi. I recently reported a similar issue in #704853. I would prefer if
the default was to mask out WLAN passwords displayed on screen. A
toggle to display/hide password would be nice, but pending that I
believe it is safer to hide the password instead of displaying it.
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 18:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 15:40:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/write_interface.c b/write_interface.c
> > index 1aa331a..2a42d48 100644
> > --- a/write_interface.c
> > +++ b/write_interface.c
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ stati
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 15:40:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> diff --git a/netcfg-static.c b/netcfg-static.c
> index 4e9ca29..1987bec 100644
> --- a/netcfg-static.c
> +++ b/netcfg-static.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv)
> case WCONFIG:
> if (requested_w
On Sun 07 Apr 2013 at 06:07:37 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>
> > > 1) The WLAN password is displayed on screen. User account passwords are
> > > not displayed on screen, so presumably it is a bug for WLAN passwords to
> > > be displayed. Bonus po
On 05/04/13 14:06, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes ("SI units (was Re: failure to communicate)"):
>> It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
>> on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
>> they haven't done so in the past), a
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 06 Apr 2013 10:21:20 +0200, a écrit :
> - manual: Samuel, time for another upload?
Yep, will do.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
On 2013-04-07 13:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here's another set of queries.
>
> Please hurry those into testing:
> - apt-setup/1:0.79
> l10n + apt-setup/multiarch unbreakage. Even if AFAICT it's
> undocumented, keeping nonworking cruft looks like a bad idea
> sin
Hello folks,
here's another set of queries.
Please hurry those into testing:
- apt-setup/1:0.79
l10n + apt-setup/multiarch unbreakage. Even if AFAICT it's
undocumented, keeping nonworking cruft looks like a bad idea
since we can avoid it with a tiny patch.
- choose-mirror/2.45
Current summary for this “take 1”:
Cyril Brulebois (06/04/2013):
> Things I'd like to see merged:
> - netcfg (preseed bug -- fixed in git -- and iw installation); awaiting
>some bits of review for the wireless-* settings part. Phil, maybe?
> - tasksel: install n-m for gnome; awaiting a repl
Am 07.04.2013 03:14, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Control: forcemerge 630575 -1
>
> Simon Reinhardt, le Sat 06 Apr 2013 10:32:53 +0200, a écrit :
>> One problem is, that the neo2 layout is completely different to the qwertz.
>
> Sure, like other dvorak layouts.
>
>> And it is not so uncommon. At l
Charles Plessy (07/04/2013):
> Hi Regid and Cyril,
>
> How about pointing to the README in the subversion repository, which explains
> everything ?
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i/trunk/README?revision=68298&view=markup
Why not.
That README could be extended to be a bit more sp
40 matches
Mail list logo
