Package: task-xfce-desktop
Version: 3.16
Severity: normal
The task xfce-desktop recommends xfprint4. This package is not available
anymore (except for m68k) since it has been removed from unstable. Quote:
"Bug#710041: Removed package(s) from unstable". Therefore please drop the
recommendation.
/An
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Schneider (16/06/2013):
> Package: task-xfce-desktop
> Version: 3.16
> Severity: normal
>
> The task xfce-desktop recommends xfprint4. This package is not available
> anymore (except for m68k) since it has been removed from unstable. Quote:
> "Bug#710041: Removed package(s) f
On dim., 2013-06-16 at 13:05 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Schneider (16/06/2013):
> > Package: task-xfce-desktop
> > Version: 3.16
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > The task xfce-desktop recommends xfprint4. This package is not available
> > anymore (except for m68k) since
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #712482 [task-xfce-desktop] task-xfce-desktop recommends unavailable
package xfprint4
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
712482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712482
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Yves-Alexis Perez (16/06/2013):
> Actually it already has been dropped from git
> (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=tasksel/tasksel.git;a=commitdiff;h=b057b6e59b3b20aa124cd08c5ca0a657e40c810a)
> but it's just missing an upload.
Since there's nothing more needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.49
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Beste Eric,
Bedankt voor je bericht via Mwah.nl. Je ontvangt onze reactie zo rap als
mogelijk.
De groeten van Mwah.
Mwah
www.mwah.nl
i...@mwah.nl
http://twitter.com/MwahNL
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:47:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#711759: fixed in flash-kernel 3.3+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #711759,
regarding flash-kernel: FTBFS in test_db due to sorting vs. locale issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:41:30 +0200
Source: flash-kernel
Binary: flash-kernel flash-kernel-installer
Architecture: armel armhf source
Version: 3.3+deb7u2
Distribution: wheezy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Tea
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
Installed from the CD in expert mode, standard packages and ssh server, but w/o
desktop,
installation completed successfully. Then decided to make change, so restarted
install
with minor partitioning changes, and selected
On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped
> now?
Some other things I'm wondering about are:
stable updates - would we need to keep kfreebsd-8 at least in sid to be
able to do these? If kfreebsd-8 is removed from test
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:amd64 Jun 15 00:06 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* OLD BUILD:amd64 Jun 15 00:07 buildd@barber b
12 matches
Mail list logo
