Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 721578 partman-zfs
Bug #721578 [debian-installer] debian-installer: LVM + ZFS fails to work
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-zfs'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #721578 to the same values
previ
reassign 721578 partman-zfs
thanks
Quoting Dan Greene (dan-gre...@wi.rr.com):
> At this point, there was an error message, but there didn't seem to be
> anything related to ZFS in /var/log/messages. I chose to contiune the
> installation, and the partitioning screen recognized those partitions as
Linux kernel ABI bump in experimental: from 3.11-rc4 to 3.11-rc7
Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#experimental
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB Flash Drive
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/
Date: 8/31/2013 ~23:00 P.M. Central Standard Time
Machine: Custom x86-64 microATX system
Processor: AMD APU A10-6800K (/proc/cpuinfo included
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I decided to try out the testing installer, and managed to break it by doing
the following:
Created a 32 bit virtuial machine (kvm) with an 8G virtual disk, and used
the testing netinst iso image from today.
In the installer:
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 02 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 02 00:03 buildd@barber b
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703648,
regarding installation-reports: Succesful installation Wheezy DI-rc1 amd64 DVD
binary-1 2013
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703176,
regarding Wheezy rc1 on Samsung series 5 Ultra
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703626,
regarding Debian 6.0.7 i386 netinstaller problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702959,
regarding installation-report: Desktop Environments and Repositories
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702774,
regarding installation-reports: Error message during installation: An attempt
to configure a
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701862,
regarding Fails to boot, no cryptsetup in initramfs
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702098,
regarding installation-reports: Installer confused by a repository specified by
its IPv6
to
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701545,
regarding installation-reports: Fail to install wheezy with DVD1-RC1
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #700598,
regarding scrambled/torn display, booting wheezy weekly amd64 CD on L850/046
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701149,
regarding Instalation failed: Probably the HD was not recognised
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #700688,
regarding Brief install report: Toshi L850/046
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701493,
regarding installation-reports: successful installation on an Acer TravelMate
P253, but fsta
We're now in September, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
work on August 2013 archives.
More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 1. September 2013, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I don't want to play bug-severity games, but I'd rate this higher than
> > wishlist, as 36 hours to even begin the installation is unreasonable.
>
> you can just cancel it and c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 699136 partman-base
Bug #699136 [partman] partman hangs with specific mbr/usbsticks
Warning: Unknown package 'partman'
Bug reassigned from package 'partman' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #699136 to the
On Sonntag, 1. September 2013, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I don't want to play bug-severity games, but I'd rate this higher than
> wishlist, as 36 hours to even begin the installation is unreasonable.
you can just cancel it and continue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
Hi,
as I'm getting to see some light at the end of this tunnel, see
http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/multi/installation-
reports,debian-installer,.png
I've been thinking how to continue...
My current idea/plan is to have the number of open bug
installation-reports
bugs going down to zero (ha
clone 721485 -1
reassign -1 partman-base
retitle -1 partman-base: /dev/disk links are not refreshed on dreamplug after
repartitioning
found -1 165
thanks
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 10:51 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> I reached this case when using and formating an ext2 root partition: it seems
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 721485 -1
Bug #721485 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: flash_kernel_set_root waits for stdin
in a particular case, which makes the installer hang
Bug 721485 cloned as bug 721491
> reassign -1 partman-base
Bug #721491 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel
Package: flash-kernel
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
The flash_kernel_set_root script (located under initramfs-tools/hooks) will
attempt to read from stdin in a particular case, which is reached when no
rootdev was found (line 33: read _ignored).
Even though $
26 matches
Mail list logo
