Hi,
Sébastien Bernard:
Cheers to team work.
Special cheers to Patrick Baggett !
And thanks to all who cared for this problem. I'd need more
users who don't shrug but complain and tell me that i'm wrong.
The bug fix is now committed as
http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/5324
(We still
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 17:37 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:01:06PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 07:35:35AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think u-boot has some sh-style control loops you can use? (for x in
fstype1 fstype2; do ...).
Nick 'tarantul' Novikov taran...@gmail.com (2014-04-29):
I tried to install current debian testing into Hyper-V (Windows 2012 R2)
virtual machine (generation 2, UEFI boot).
The virtual machine has booted successfully, the installer starts in text
mode, but the keyboard does not respond.
If I
I download this 26 April:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso
By the way, Ubuntu 14.04 installed without problems, keyboard and mouse
works fine.
Ubuntu uses the same installer?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Cyril Brulebois
Nick 'tarantul' Novikov taran...@gmail.com (2014-04-29):
I download this 26 April:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso
Alright. From what I can see, there's a hyperv-keyboard module now,
which is indeed built as a module (r20933 from a
I am currently investigating this unusual behavior with strcmp, and I am
unable to reproduce the problem using the test_strcmp example provided.
It returns the correct output of,
result from strcmp('\','\0001' is -1)
This was built on Debian Wheezy with a T2000 SPARC processor using GCC
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Kieron Gillespie
ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently investigating this unusual behavior with strcmp, and I am
unable to reproduce the problem using the test_strcmp example provided.
It returns the correct output of,
result from
I'll rebuild one of my SunBlade 2500 latter with sid and see if I get the
same result. If it doesn't show the symptom I will rebuild my T2000 and see
if it is something specific to the Niagara T1.
-Kieron
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote:
Le
Le 29/04/2014 16:34, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
I am currently investigating this unusual behavior with strcmp, and I
am unable to reproduce the problem using the test_strcmp example provided.
It returns the correct output of,
result from strcmp('\','\0001' is -1)
This was built on
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Patrick Baggett baggett.patr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Kieron Gillespie
ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently investigating this unusual behavior with strcmp, and I am
unable to reproduce the problem using the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Kieron Gillespie
ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Kieron Gillespie
ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently investigating
Le 29/04/2014 16:50, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
I'll rebuild one of my SunBlade 2500 latter with sid and see if I get
the same result. If it doesn't show the symptom I will rebuild my
T2000 and see if it is something specific to the Niagara T1.
-Kieron
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM,
Yes, that's the one. Interestingly, in glibc-2.19, this change is reverted.
It is present in glibc-2.17 glibc-2.18 as released by GNU. Oddly, in
glibc git, the buggy version appears.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lennart Sorensen
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
Le 29/04/2014 16:50, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
I'll rebuild one of my SunBlade 2500 latter with sid and see if I
get the same result. If it doesn't show the symptom I will rebuild
my T2000 and see if it is something specific
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, that's the one. Interestingly, in glibc-2.19, this change is
reverted. It is present in glibc-2.17 glibc-2.18 as released by GNU.
Oddly, in glibc git, the buggy version appears.
I've filed a bug with
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:53:32PM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, that's the one. Interestingly, in glibc-2.19, this change is
reverted. It is present in glibc-2.17 glibc-2.18 as released by GNU.
Oddly,
Do we currently have a master list of all the major bugs facing the Sparc
Port right now?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that's the one.
Le 30/04/2014 00:12, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
Do we currently have a master list of all the major bugs facing the
Sparc Port right now?
I don't think so. I haven't been able to get one.
You can start one.
Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
https://wiki.debian.org/PortsSparc
Started a catagory of major bugs. Please place links and titles to the bug
report in this list so we can better track the status and reference the
problems quickly.
One of my major problems with helping debian and the sparc port has been
simply figuring out
Hello,
2014-04-28 12:26 GMT+02:00 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 19:06 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:42:23AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Aside: EfikaMX is listed in 2.1.2.4 as no longer supported, but we do
supply a specific image for it
Hello,
2014-03-20 19:26 GMT+01:00 Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org:
[...]
This is the commit that has removed the code:
commit c7c29b3aeb318b9efe3035cacf42800dfe2970f5
Author: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Date: Wed Aug 1 12:49:30 2012 -0500
ARM: efikamx: remove Genesi
Are the iop32x images still around for the older kernels in an archive
somewhere? There is nothing here http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/
since they only go back to March 2014.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014
* Chris Wilkinson kins...@verizon.net [2014-04-29 21:40]:
Are the iop32x images still around for the older kernels in an archive
somewhere? There is nothing here http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/
since they only go back to March 2014.
They're in Debian stable:
Linux kernel ABI bump in unstable: from 3.13-1 to 3.14-1
Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#unstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
24 matches
Mail list logo
