console-setup_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
keyboard-configuration_1.110_all.deb
console-setup_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-freebsd_1.110_all.deb
console-setup_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
keyboard-configuration_1.110_all.deb
console-setup_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.110_all.deb
console-setup-freebsd_1.110_all.deb
bdf2psf_1.110_all.deb
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:19:33 +
with message-id e1xebcl-0002xp...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#729321: fixed in console-setup 1.110
has caused the Debian Bug report #729321,
regarding keyboard-configuration: changes /etc/default/keyboard upon upgrade
without asking
to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:00:30 +0200
Source: console-setup
Binary: keyboard-configuration console-setup console-setup-mini
console-setup-linux console-setup-freebsd bdf2psf console-setup-udeb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2014-08-03):
the ram requirements needed to install with d-i stated in the
d-i manual are not up-to-date.
Indeed they are outdated since release of Wheezy and before.
Read
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit :
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2014-08-03):
the ram requirements needed to install with d-i stated in the
d-i manual are not up-to-date.
Indeed they are outdated since
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit :
So what needs to be changed?
In
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/05/msg00662.html
I have already proposed the following:
Table 3.2. Recommended Minimum System Requirements
Install TypeRAM (minimal) RAM
Package: installation-guide
Tags: patch
Hi,
in the d-i manual, I have noticed there are some mentions of
2.6 kernel being the default kernel series in Debian.
I have prepared a patch to fix that (attached).
Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series
shipped with
Hello,
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit :
Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series
shipped with the respective release.
Would it be worse to add such an entity?
I'm actually surprised it wasn't there already.:
Is 3.14 kernel for Jessie
On Mon 04 Aug 2014 at 11:39:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit :
So what needs to be changed?
In
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/05/msg00662.html
I have already proposed the following:
Table 3.2. Recommended
Hi,
I found your contact over the web and wanted to send you a quick note.
With Search Engine Optimization and Web Development, I can help your
business achieve better ranking on prominent search engines like Google,
Bing others to generate more leads/sales.
This may look like one of those
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit :
Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series
shipped with the respective release.
Would it be worse to add such an entity?
I'm
Hi,
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit :
Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series
shipped with the respective release.
Would it be worse to add such an entity?
I'm actually
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 22:54:17 +0200, a écrit :
Then there is no need to create that entity at all, right?
Indeed.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
14 matches
Mail list logo
