Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 769107 grub-installer
Bug #769107 [debian-installer] debian-installer: grub-installer fails if more
than 26 SCSI devices are present
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'.
No longer marked as found in
Linux kernel ABI bump in testing: from 3.16-3 to 3.16.0-4
Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:18:48 +
with message-id e1xov0i-0002pl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#769190: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #769190,
regarding busybox-static: DNS resolver is broken again with the last upload
to be marked as
busybox_1.22.0-12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-12.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-12.debian.tar.xz
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-12_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:37:11 +0300
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.22.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-11-12):
Current patches attached here.
I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
installed EFI systems were failing, due to the broken GUID on the
ESP. Yay!
I've merged things forward and I'm ready to push these changes. Please
Control: tag -1 +pending
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 01:12:14PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-11-12):
Current patches attached here.
I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
installed EFI systems were failing, due to the broken GUID
Processing control commands:
tag -1 +pending
Bug #763127 [partman-efi] UEFI corner case - installer booted in UEFI mode,
existing system in BIOS mode
Added tag(s) pending.
--
763127: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:53:51AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
12.11.2014 04:27, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-11
Severity: important
This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was
reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As
BTW, the bug is _not_ fixed by -12 upload where I added a build-dep on libc-bin.
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546396a3.1000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
12.11.2014 21:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[]
And there's nothing I can do about this on busybox side -- except,
again, adding a versioned build-dep.
I'll schedule binNMUs for now, but it might be a good idea to add a
versioned build-dep so that it doesn't happen again.
Please don't. I want
Quoting Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com):
(I hope you won't have to run fast because of the templates. ;))
Ahem, yes. Sorry, Christian! I've added another template which will
need translating, please... See partman-efi.
Then, you have to run very fast now..;-)
I hope this is at least
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
12.11.2014 21:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[]
And there's nothing I can do about this on busybox side -- except,
again, adding a versioned build-dep.
I'll schedule binNMUs for now, but it might be a good idea to add a
12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete list?
It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha ia64] |
libc0.1-dev ( 2.19-12~)
Hi,
Michael Tokarev wrote:
Since this is all alternatives, is it really necessary to list the [arch]
names? I mean, just list of pkgs with versions should be enough I think,
each arch will pick the right name, no?
I could be wrong, but I think within sbuild only the first of the
alternatives
busybox_1.22.0-13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-13.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-13.debian.tar.xz
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-13_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
busybox source: lintian output: 'conflicting-negation-in-source-relation
build-depends: libc6-dev ( 2.19-12~) [linux-any !alpha !ia64]', automatically
rejected package.
busybox source: lintian output: 'conflicting-negation-in-source-relation
build-depends: libc6-dev ( 2.19) [linux-any !alpha
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:03:39AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete
list?
It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha
13.11.2014 00:03, Michael Tokarev пишет:
12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete list?
It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:03:56 +
with message-id e1xog16-0004ka...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#769190: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #769190,
regarding busybox-static: DNS resolver is broken again with the last upload
to be marked as
busybox_1.22.0-13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-13.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-13.debian.tar.xz
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-13_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:59:30 +0300
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.22.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
As far as I can see without testing this means regarding the display of
Blends in D-I (#758096) that we only need to *decide* and in case we
want to do this add the needed bits of data.
Any opinions regarding a decision?
Tasksel
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:05:44PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
We're still build-depending on elilo on ia64, while this package got
removed (#755509); since ia64 is quite unmaintained, it might make sense
to actually drop this build dependency and let
| | Hello.
I know the typical setting to run a PXE server is the combination of
DHCP+TFTP+HTTP/FTP/NFS... servers, but my setting only must consist in a
DHCP+HTTP server (both in one machine with ip 192.168.1.1). So my dhcpd.conf
has these lines:
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:00:26AM +, Oscar Torrente wrote:
| | Hello.
I know the typical setting to run a PXE server is the combination of
DHCP+TFTP+HTTP/FTP/NFS... servers, but my setting only must consist
in a DHCP+HTTP server
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I hope this is at least good English..;-)
Sadly, it is not. Or more precisely, to not let people think that I
write betrter English than Steve, some wording is not consistent with
what's used in other parts of D-I.
Noticeably Your computer is
27 matches
Mail list logo
