Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:09:40 +0200
Source: grub-installer
Binary: grub-installer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.124
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian
grub-installer_1.124_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.124.dsc
grub-installer_1.124.tar.xz
grub-installer_1.124_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
grub-installer_1.124_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.124.dsc
grub-installer_1.124.tar.xz
grub-installer_1.124_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
console-setup-pc-ekbd_1.129_all.udeb doesn't exist
console-setup-pc-ekmap_1.129_all.udeb doesn't exist
console-setup-sun4-ekmap_1.129_all.udeb doesn't exist
console-setup-sun5-ekmap_1.129_all.udeb doesn't exist
console-setup-udeb_1.129_all.udeb doesn't exist
console-setup_1.129_all.deb doesn't exis
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Hello everybody,
Hi,
> AFAICS there is no way to determine the "active" console in
> u-boot and set either the u-boot console variable or the
> stdout-path property accordingly. Even if there was such a
> mechanism, the question
Processing control commands:
> retitle 782287 hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i
Bug #782287 [hw-detect] hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#782287 to the same title
--
782287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782287
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> retitle 782287 hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i
Bug #782287 [hw-detect] (no subject)
Set Bug title to 'hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i'.
--
782287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Control: retitle 782287 hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i
hi,
with my open-vm-tools maintainer head on, I can NOT recommend to add a
hard dependency on the open-vm-tools package to the installer - although
I'd be very happy to have this functionality in d-i as having a running
vmtoolsd is
Hi,
Karsten Merker (2015-06-21):
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 09:17:12AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> > On 2015-06-21, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > > If we don't pass a console variable to the kernel, d-i starts
> > > on the console device defined by the platform's stdout-path
> > > property, i
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad
> > while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1).
>
> What programma and/or device did
On 2015-06-21, Karsten Merker wrote:
> If we don't pass a console variable to the kernel, d-i starts
> on the console device defined by the platform's stdout-path
> property, i.e. usually on a serial console - again bad luck
> for people having only a framebuffer console.
>
> If we set the console
Source: busybox
Version: 1.22.0
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Hello,
Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang
instead of gcc.
The error message is like this:
>>debianutils/lib.a(mktemp.o): In function `mktemp_main':
>>/home/builder/workspace/busybox/busybox-1
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #789475 [busybox] udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #789475 to the same tags previously set
--
789475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #789475 [busybox] udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
789475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
> The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad
> while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1).
What programma and/or device did recognize "52-54-0-12-34-56" as bad?
How was the e
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad while it should be
valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1).
-
Capture of the DHCP reply:
be1.lrz.bootps > 192.168.7.107.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP,
17 matches
Mail list logo