Ansgar Burchardt (2016-10-31):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
> >
> > dak copy-installer 20161027
>
> Done. Can we remove older version from testing and unstable?
Thanks; I need to think a bit about which version(s) to keep, but yeah,
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>
> dak copy-installer 20161027
Done. Can we remove older version from testing and unstable?
Ansgar
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:03:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#842591: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.86
has caused the Debian Bug report #842591,
regarding debootstrap-udeb: fails to validate InRelease (BADSIG)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Hi,
FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
dak copy-installer 20161027
Release team, I already hinted it:
urgent debian-installer/20161027
(-boot@: final stages of checking the debootstrap fix.)
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Samuel Thibault]
> I just noticed some bug reports against the wrong package, reassigning
> them with the content quoted below.
Thank you. For the record, I still got the machine and can test, if
someone want me to test something on it. :)
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: localechooser
Version: 2.69
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I have been told several times that it was a bit sad that the Debian
installer basically imposess that the translations be the same as the
locale, i.e. notably not being able to have all messages in english
while using a non-english l
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
My coworker installed Debian on an amd64-capable laptop, but happened to
take the 32bit ISO image by mistake, and of course we noticed only after
finishing the installation :)
She was surprised that there was no warning about installing 32b
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 installation-reports
Bug #740465 [src:installation-report] installation-report: consider including
Xorg.0.log
Bug reassigned from package 'src:installation-report' to 'installation-reports'.
No longer marked as found in versions installation-report/2.54.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 installation-reports
Bug #606110 [installation-report] installation-report: gtk installer fail to
start with PXE boot of Dell Latitude D505
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-report' to 'installation-reports'.
Ignoring request to alter found versi
Control: reassign -1 installation-reports
Hello,
I just noticed some bug reports against the wrong package, reassigning
them with the content quoted below.
Samuel
Petter Reinholdtsen, on Mon 06 Dec 2010 13:53:56 +0100, wrote:
>
> Package: installation-report
>
> I just tested a PXE installat
Control: reassign -1 installation-reports
Hello,
I just noticed some bug reports against the wrong package, reassigning
them with the content quoted below.
Samuel
Cyril Brulebois, on Sat 01 Mar 2014 23:43:15 +0100, wrote:
> Source: installation-report
> Version: 2.54
> Severity: normal
>
> I'v
Lennart Sorensen (2016-10-18):
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:33:03AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Late to the party, but maybe shorter than the (funny though) tr|sed|tr
> > dance: head -c -1 lets you remove the last character of a file.
> >
> > (Tested to work OK inside d-i with debian-8.6.0-
Package: debootstrap-udeb
Version: 1.0.85
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The (re)addition of InRelease support broke debootstrap(-udeb) in a d-i
context. The sed|tr|sed dance doesn't kill the final newline, which
leads to a BAD signature.
My original proposal was to use h
On 10/11/2016 11:40 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> So far, the plan is to default to simple @rootfs and @home subvolumes,
> because I've read that backing up OpenSUSE systems is cumbersome with
> all of those subvolumes, and also because of the KISS principle; [...]
FWIW, given that I just encoun
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:15:52 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#826844: netcfg ignoring BOOTF= in kernel cmdline
has caused the Debian Bug report #826844,
regarding netcfg ignoring BOOTF= in kernel cmdline
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
15 matches
Mail list logo