Bug#157888: (c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar

[Randolph Chung 2002-08-22] > I'll look into this in more detail, but keep in mind that while it *is* > a goal for cdebconf and debconf to have compatible database formats, > there's no current plans to make their configuration files (debconf.conf > vs cdebconf.conf) compatible -- the cdebconf vers

Bug#841842: debian-installer: should use EXT4's native file-system-level encryption

On 6/25/2017 4:19 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Marcos Mobley (2016-10-23): >> it would be nice to be able to use EXT4's native file-system-level >> encryption instead of LUKS. > > As far as I understand it, this would only protect the contents of a > given directory instead of the whole filesyste

Bug#157888: (c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar

Petter Reinholdtsen (2017-06-25): > [Randolph Chung 2002-08-22] > > I'll look into this in more detail, but keep in mind that while it *is* > > a goal for cdebconf and debconf to have compatible database formats, > > there's no current plans to make their configuration files (debconf.conf > > vs c

Bug#792823: keyboard-configuration: keymap variant unsupported by debian-installer should be use for the installed system

Package: keyboard-configuration Version: 1.164 Followup-For: Bug #792823 Dear Maintainer, problem still persists in Stretch. To reproduce, add the following option to the kernel command line while booting the

Bug#865884: installation-reports: On misaligned offset 'Do you want to return to partitioning menu?' No redirects to partitioning menu

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i -- Package-specific info: Boot method: Image version: Date: Machine: Partitions: Filesystem Type Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on udev devtmpfs 1004549410 10041391% /dev tmpfs tmpfs1007357

Processed: merge 687687 835080

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 687687 835080 Bug #687687 [netcfg] Cannot preseed ESSID Bug #835080 [netcfg] debian-installer: Preseeding of ESSID is impossible, apparently Merged 687687 835080 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#687687: Cannot preseed ESSID

tags 687687 +patch thanks Package: netcfg Version: 1.143 Followup-For: Bug #687687 Dear Maintainer, problem still exists in Stretch. Preseeding either: d-i netcfg/wireless_show_essids select net-essid or: d-i netcfg/wireless_show_essids select manual d-i netcfg/wireless_essid string net-essid

Bug#841842: debian-installer: should use EXT4's native file-system-level encryption

TL;DR summary: * For single user systems, use LUKS / dm-crypt. * For multi-user systems, file system level encryption may make sense, but a lot of the tools necessary to do user-friendly key management for a traditional Unix desktop or server have not been implemented yet. Ext4 encryption

Bug#865425: marked as done (debian-installer-9-netboot-mips64el: mips64el Malta netboot installer finds no installable kernel)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:04:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#865425: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.111 has caused the Debian Bug report #865425, regarding debian-installer-9-netboot-mips64el: mips64el Malta netboot installer finds no installable kernel to be marked as

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.111_source.changes

libdebian-installer_0.111_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdebian-installer_0.111.dsc libdebian-installer_0.111.tar.xz libdebian-installer_0.111_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

libdebian-installer_0.111_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:42:05 +0200 Source: libdebian-installer Binary: libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer4-dev libdebian-installer4-udeb libdebian-installer-extra4 libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb Architecture: sourc

Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.or

Re: Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

Control: tag -1 confirmed Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2017-06-18): > As discussed on debian-boot starting from > https://lists.debian.org/4374235.3xk2uo9...@odyx.org , win32-loader > (in stretch) still doesn't use the deb.debian.org agreed-upon mirror. > Also, as it's standalone version embeds multiple

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend. >15/16 July >22/23 July Both

Bug#854822: installation-report: U-boot not correctly installed when partitioning with "Guided - use entire disk"

On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Karsten Merker (2017-02-10): >> when using the "Guided - use entire disk" option, partman by >> default clobbers the boot sector and the area after it (where >> u-boot is located) to make sure that there are no remains of old >> pa

Bug#854822: installation-report: U-boot not correctly installed when partitioning with "Guided - use entire disk"

Hi Rick, Rick Thomas (2017-06-25): > On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Karsten Merker (2017-02-10): > >> when using the "Guided - use entire disk" option, partman by > >> default clobbers the boot sector and the area after it (where > >> u-boot is located) to make sure th

Bug#854822: marked as done (installation-report: U-boot not correctly installed when partitioning with "Guided - use entire disk")

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:34:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#854822: fixed in partman-base 192 has caused the Debian Bug report #854822, regarding installation-report: U-boot not correctly installed when partitioning with "Guided - use entire disk" to be marked as done.

Processing of partman-base_192_source.changes

partman-base_192_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-base_192.dsc partman-base_192.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

partman-base_192_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 00:11:48 +0200 Source: partman-base Binary: partman-base partman-utils Architecture: source Version: 192 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril

Re: Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority

Ansgar Burchardt writes: > I discussed this a bit on IRC with the other ftp-masters and we came to > this summary: > 0) We would like to drop the requirement for packages to not depend on >packages of lower priority: it is better to declare only what we >actually want included in the ins

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no prefer

Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding

Thanks Julius, your solution helped me, but I ran across one small issue when using this for a PXE install: the swap lvm from that volume group was in use by Debian. I added a swapoff command to yours: swapoff "/dev/$vg/swap" I doubt all LVMs for swap are named "swap", it was the name for me. T

Bug#157888: marked as done ((c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:43:51 +0200 with message-id <2flzicvl2w8@diskless.uio.no> and subject line Re: Bug#157888: (c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar has caused the Debian Bug report #157888, regarding (c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar to be marked

Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Current errors are: > E: error getting madison info for partman-newworld for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for partman-zfs for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for prep-installer for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for qui

Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Christian PERRIER (2017-06-26): > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > Current errors are: > > E: error getting madison info for partman-newworld for 'testing' > > E: error getting madison info for partman-zfs for 'testing' > > E: error getting madison info for prep-installer for 'tes

Processing of cdebconf-terminal_0.29_i386.changes

cdebconf-terminal_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf-terminal_0.29.dsc cdebconf-terminal_0.29.tar.xz cdebconf-gtk-terminal_0.29_i386.udeb cdebconf-newt-terminal_0.29_i386.udeb cdebconf-terminal_0.29_i386.buildinfo Greetings, Your

cdebconf-terminal_0.29_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:41:00 +0200 Source: cdebconf-terminal Binary: cdebconf-gtk-terminal cdebconf-newt-terminal Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.29 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install Sy

Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > partman-zfs is kfreebsd-* only; others are powerpc-specific, which is no > > > longer a release architecture. Christian, which update would be the best > > > one to reflect those changes? Add a minus sign after those packages in > > > packages_list?

Processing of choose-mirror_2.80_i386.changes

choose-mirror_2.80_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_2.80.dsc choose-mirror_2.80.tar.xz choose-mirror-bin_2.80_i386.udeb choose-mirror_2.80_all.udeb choose-mirror_2.80_i386.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running o

Processing of clock-setup_0.133_i386.changes

clock-setup_0.133_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: clock-setup_0.133.dsc clock-setup_0.133.tar.xz clock-setup_0.133_i386.buildinfo clock-setup_0.133_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

choose-mirror_2.80_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:19:07 +0200 Source: choose-mirror Binary: choose-mirror choose-mirror-bin Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.80 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Ch