Bug#873465: apt: wrongly reports failure on 'update' on mips64el, triggers d-i FTBFS

Package: apt Version: 1.5~beta2 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Justification: triggers FTBFS (Please keep debian-boot@ in the loop.) Hi, Daily builds of the Debian Installer on mips64el have started erroring out on 2017-08-19 with what I believed was some kind of network issue; but we've just hit

debian-installer_20170828_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:02:44 + Source: debian-installer Binary: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20170828 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Processing of debian-installer_20170828_source.changes

debian-installer_20170828_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20170828.dsc debian-installer_20170828.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#872091: marked as done (debian-installer: fdisk dependency needed)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#872091: fixed in debian-installer 20170828 has caused the Debian Bug report #872091, regarding debian-installer: fdisk dependency needed to be marked as done. This means

Bug#870615: marked as done (debian-installer: FTBFS on armhf: missing firefly-rk3288/u-boot.img)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870615: fixed in debian-installer 20170828 has caused the Debian Bug report #870615, regarding debian-installer: FTBFS on armhf: missing firefly-rk3288/u-boot.img to be

Bug#873462: debian-installer: need to figure out what rendering to use in graphical installer

Source: debian-installer Severity: important During the beginning of the buster release cycle, a number of changes have affected the installer (hello expat, hello udev), and the most visible ones right now are: - fontconfig-udeb: between 2.11.0-6.7 and 2.12.x (I didn't check the x=1 version

Scheduling 9.2

Hi, I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around 23rd September. How about one of: 23rd/24th September 30th Septmber/1st October [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] After discussion with Adam and Steve, we felt it made sense to work on 2 months for stable and

Bug#873390: [PATCH] flash-kernel: Provide hook to start EFI application

Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.84 Severity: wishlist Instead of starting the Linux kernel from U-Boot we may want to start an EFI application like grub or iPXE. Let us use a new hook @@UBOOT_PREBOOT_EXTRA@@ in the boot.scr generation for this purpose. The related hook files are to be placed in

Bug#860304: Aw: Re: Bug#860304: [BUG 860304] flash-kernel: Incorrect installation path for dtbs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/25/2017 05:31 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2017-08-24, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> is there really any need to keep /boot/dtbs/VERSION/ if we have >> /boot/dtbs/VERSION/VENDOR/? > > Yes, if the u-boot version on the board sets fdtfile