On 2017-09-25, Josua Mayer wrote:
> The SolidRun CuBox has very good support in Mainline Linux.
> Thus it is a great candidate for supporting it in Debian.
...
> I have come up with the database entry below, and this preliminary
> boot-script:
> setenv loadaddr 0x0200
> setenv loadaddrrd 0x2
I am hereby providing the complete U-Boot environment:
CuBox>> printenv
baudrate=115200
loads_echo=0
rootpath=/mnt/ARM_FS/
netmask=255.255.255.0
console=console=ttyS0,115200 useNandHal=single
mtdids=nand0=dove-nand
mtdparts=mtdparts=dove-nand:4m(boot),-(rootfs)
arcNumber=3905
CASset=min
MALLOC_len
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.79
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The SolidRun CuBox has very good support in Mainline Linux.
Thus it is a great candidate for supporting it in Debian.
As I see it there are only 2 blockers right now:
- missing conifg options in the kernel packag
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this happily
>makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the festive
>season).
>
>Accordingly I'm looking at one of:
>
>25th November
>2nd De
It is a "simple" system with legacy boot and btrfs disks (described here
https://wiki.couderc.eu/doku.php?id=public:a_perfect_btrfs_server).
"simple" but I had to force grub reinstall for it to boot first time.
Now it boots very fine.
But if I connect a USB hard disk (formatted in bftrs with
On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Accordingly I'm looking at one of:
25th November
2nd December
9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending
the cycle)
Of course the 25th would be a terrible choice and I should have realised
that; that leave
6 matches
Mail list logo
