rescue_1.68_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 07:12:44 +0100 Source: rescue Binary: rescue-check rescue-mode Architecture: source Version: 1.68 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian Per

Processing of rescue_1.68_source.changes

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rescue_1.68_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rescue_1.68.dsc rescue_1.68.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processed: DD uid migration

2017-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter frede...@fr.ibm.com > submitter 876186 ! Bug #876186 [src:freebsd-glue] freebsd-glue: fix ctfutils FTBFS on ppc64el Changed Bug submitter to 'fre...@debian.org' from 'frede...@fr.ibm.com (fbonnard)'. > submitter 833751 ! Bug

Processed: your mail

2017-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter fre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > submitter 878121 ! Bug #878121 [src:openblas] OpenBLAS flavors Changed Bug submitter to 'frede...@fr.ibm.com (fbonnard)' from 'Frédéric Bonnard '. > submitter 814255 ! Bug #814255 [src:luajit] [PA

debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:59:53 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-8-netboot-armel debian-installer-8-netboot-armhf debia

debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:04 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-9-netboot-armel debian-installer-9-netboot-armhf debia

Debian Installer Buster Alpha 2 release

2017-12-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second alpha release of the installer for Debian 10 "Buster". Important notes for this release of the installer = * The unattended-upgrades package is now installed by default through the

Bug#883715: release-notes: please document unattended-upgrades

2017-12-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: release-notes Severity: normal [Please keep debian-boot@ and hert...@debian.org in copy of your answers.] Hi, Raphaël Hertzog enabled unattended-upgrades support by default in pkgsel, which is first shipped with the D-I Buster Alpha 2 release (#875858). It would be nice to document thi

Bug#883711: pkgsel: should running updatedb really be the default?

2017-12-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: pkgsel Version: 0.46 Severity: important Hi, This commit looks like something that should be been discussed, rather than something I get to discover while preparing the release announcement: | commit fdc3d5a6cf5d2af0ca67494321faf4088170362a | Author: Raphaël Hertzog | Date: Fri Sep 15

Bug#883698: freetype: incorrect shlibs file generation

2017-12-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Source: freetype Version: 2.8.1-0.1 Severity: serious (Please keep debian-boot@lists.debian.org in copy of your replies.) Hi, While preparing the release announcement for Buster Alpha 2, I've stumbled upon the symbols addition in your last upload. Checking the dependency for the udeb, it seems t

debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping jessie to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:59:53 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-8-netboot-ar

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5_amd64.changes

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b5.tar.xz debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64_20150422+deb8u4.b5_all.d

debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping stretch to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:04 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-ins

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1_source.changes

2017-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u2.b1_sourc

Bug#883580: debian-installer: arm64: please ship dtb files

2017-12-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 07:53 +0100, Andre Heider wrote: > > I don't know what devices you work on, but I have a couple of different > consumer armhf and arm64 devices, spread out over different > architectures. All their device trees are updated every single kernel > release. Often it's for new

Bug#883580: debian-installer: arm64: please ship dtb files

2017-12-06 Thread Hermann Lauer
Hello All, On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:47:12PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > Please don't ship dtb files at all, including the kernel images. ... > it appears to me that this argument assumes a situation that we > simply don't have for many devices. A lot of the ARM-based > devices that Debian