debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:29:21 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-9-netboot-armel debian-installer-9-netboot-armhf debia

Accepted debian-installer-netboot-images 20170615+deb9u3 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:29:21 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-9-netboot-armel debian-installer-9-netboot-armhf debian-installer-9

Bug#694068: netcfg: Wireless connectivity present during an install but absent afterwards

Brian Potkin wrote: > The number of users affected by this issue over the years is not > insignificant. Not a single one has written in support of the > situation. This issue has bitten me at least twice so far. This issue's history seems to be bogged down on whether interfaces(5) can be mode 06

debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Mapping stretch to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:29:21 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-ins

Re: [Pkg-dns-devel] What to do with isc-dhcp-client-udeb?

Hi all, Ondřej Surý (2018-01-23): > I would also love to get rid of the isc-dhcp-client-udeb, but so far > the message from the busybox team was that the dhcp client there > doesn't compile there and needs some upstream work to get it working. > > (As a matter of fact, the busybox doesn't compil

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u3_source.buildinfo

Re: Installing 2 encrypted Debians alongside Windows

On 05/03/2018 17:44, coco...@t-online.de wrote: > If I try to accomplish this with the 9.2.1 install DVD, will Debian > Installer be aware of the existence of the pre-existing Debian install > when generating/updating Grub? Yep. -Jonathan

Installing 2 encrypted Debians alongside Windows

Hi. Debian 9.2.1 MATE. LUKS-encrypted via Debian Installer from 9.2.1 DVD. Current partition scheme: EFI; Windows 10; Debian /boot; LUKS-encrypted Debian /root & /swap; Unallocated; Windows 10 Recovery. I'd like to have a second, LUKS-encrypted install of Debian on the unallocated partition, so t

Re: Clean up bug report for debootstrap

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:22:04 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: > It seems that we can close below bug reports for debootstrap with > proposed patches (including mine). I've prepared NMU for fixes about old archived releases and will upload 10 delayed queue. I believe that it is no harm for buster/si

Bug#694068: netcfg: Wireless connectivity present during an install but absent afterwards

On Fri 23 Nov 2012 at 14:31:20 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > I installed in expert mode over a wireless link from > > Debian GNU/Linux testing "Wheezy" - Official Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 > 20121122-21:21 > > This ISO has netcfg_1.102. Only "Standard system utilities" was selected > as a t

Re: Armel: Debian installer freeezes (GuruPlug Server plus)

I think GuruPlug doesn't have SPI-flash -> BootRom is executed before U-boot -> virtual memory is set-up for MMU for U-boot. 88F6281 SoC is probably using Kirkwood series 12KB BootRom ver. 1.21 or later, but I cannot find prom source code (propietary/NDA stuff?). 88F6281 prom MMU memory setup