Bug#962925: partman-efi: improve non_efi_system question

2020-06-15 Thread McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
Package: partman-efi Version: 84 Severity: minor If find the partman-efi/non_efi_system question somewhat confusing. If one sets it to 'false' that means the installer will configure the system for BIOS mode booting, even if the installer is running in EFI mode. If one sets it 'true', then even i

Bug#924290: [rfc] information about EFI partitions

2020-06-15 Thread McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:34:40PM +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote: > >Revised patch below. I'll test it on amd64 and let you know >if it works. This has now been tested on a number of installs and works ok. I think it's good to go now. The partman-efi/non_efi_system question is somewhat confusing,

[PATCH apt-setup] generators/50mirror: Use is_ports_architecture from base-installer

2020-06-15 Thread наб
The hard versioned dependency is required since that function will have just moved in in 1.195 and we didn't depend on base-installer before This shouldn't affect users, since apt-mirror-setup is likely pulled in by apt-setup-udeb, which depends on installed-base, provided by bootstrap-base and li

[PATCH debian-installer] Pass "--extra-suites=unreleased" to debootstrap on ports arches

2020-06-15 Thread наб
This fixes, e.g., hurd installs from mini ISOs, which require libp11-kit0 from unreleased for a functioning apt. is_ports_architecture() extracted from apt-setup's 50mirror: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/-/blob/584e84b5a1d6e71ecb94e503a1a8e546048d215b/generators/50mirror#L28-45

Re: Bug#877258: stretch-pu: package busybox/1:1.22.0-19+deb9u1

2020-06-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote... > > > Is this still something we should try to get into stretch (now to > > late > > for 9.12 but might be possible for 9.13)? > > For me, I would like to, so I'll re-visit the scenary and will try to > even

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 15/06/20 19:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Adam D. Barratt (2020-06-15): >> To get the ball rolling, please could you confirm your availability >> for: >> >> - July 11/12 >> - July 18/19 > > > Anyway, I should be available, whatever date(s) get picked. > Preferance would be the weeken

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2020-06-15): > stretch transitions from oldstable-with-security-support to LTS support > on Saturday July 4th. As usual, we should aim for the final point > release to be soon after that, most likely pulling in any remaining > updates from security.d.o that are still in oldst

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey Adam, On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:44:54PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >stretch transitions from oldstable-with-security-support to LTS support >on Saturday July 4th. As usual, we should aim for the final point >release to be soon after that, most likely pulling in any remaining >updates f

stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, stretch transitions from oldstable-with-security-support to LTS support on Saturday July 4th. As usual, we should aim for the final point release to be soon after that, most likely pulling in any remaining updates from security.d.o that are still in oldstable-new. I think Saturday July 11th m