Re: Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 09:54:34PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:42:22 +, Steve McIntyre >> said: > >> Maybe. I'm surprised and maybe a little unhappy that it's in the >> rotation of "community" images. I don't think it belongs there.. >Hi Steve, > >I th

Re: Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hello Holger On 2020/12/19 21:03, Holger Wansing wrote: > I gave it a try these days, and it looks like a good alternative to our > debian-installer, at least for some user groups (for example unexperienced > end-users or people, who are new to Debian). > Of course, it only supports only a subse

Re: Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:42:22 +, Steve McIntyre > said: > Maybe. I'm surprised and maybe a little unhappy that it's in the > rotation of "community" images. I don't think it belongs there.. Hi Steve, I think it's a good idea to show more than only the Debian community in th

Re: Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 08:03:22PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi all, > >with the publication of the new homepage, the Calamares Installer came to my >notice. I was not aware of that before. > >Should we mention it on the website a little bit more? Maybe. I'm surprised and maybe a little unhap

Re: Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:03:22 +0100, Holger Wansing > said: > Should we mention it on the website a little bit more? Yes. My plan is to mention it on a new download page. We will work on a reorganisation of the download page. > I gave it a try these days, and it looks like a g

Calamares Installer on the website?

2020-12-19 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi all, with the publication of the new homepage, the Calamares Installer came to my notice. I was not aware of that before. Should we mention it on the website a little bit more? I gave it a try these days, and it looks like a good alternative to our debian-installer, at least for some user g

rootskel-gtk_1.42_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-12-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:43:01 +0200 Source: rootskel-gtk Architecture: source Version: 1.42 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Jonathan Carter Closes: 927547 Changes

Processing of rootskel-gtk_1.42_source.changes

2020-12-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rootskel-gtk_1.42_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel-gtk_1.42.dsc rootskel-gtk_1.42.tar.xz rootskel-gtk_1.42_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#927547: marked as done (Updating the rootskel-gtk Uploaders list)

2020-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2020 17:53:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#927547: fixed in rootskel-gtk 1.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #927547, regarding Updating the rootskel-gtk Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#977705: installation bug report

2020-12-19 Thread Jacek Czerniawski
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Stick Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bullseye_di_alpha3/i386/iso-cd/debian-bullseye-DI-alpha3-i386-netinst.iso https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bullseye_di_alpha3/i386/iso-dvd/debian-bullseye-DI-alpha3-i386-DVD-1.iso Date: 18 De