Issues activated on the debian-installer project on salsa

Hi, Since I haven't been able to find a reliable pad system over the last few years, and since I don't quite like having pending issues in my head or on local notes (only), I've followed zeha's nice suggestion, and turned on issues on the debian-installer project. Then stashed the few things that

Processed: Bug#1033913 marked as pending in partman-efi

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033913 [partman-efi] partman-auto-lvm: Broken "Guided - use entire disk and set up LVM" in UEFI mode Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033913: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033913 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debi

Processed: Bug#834373 marked as pending in partman-efi

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #834373 [partman-efi] UEFI: Fails to install to blank drive Added tag(s) pending. -- 834373: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834373 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

preseed_1.115_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 01:44:37 +0200 Source: preseed Architecture: source Version: 1.115 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By:

Processing of preseed_1.115_source.changes

preseed_1.115_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: preseed_1.115.dsc preseed_1.115.tar.xz preseed_1.115_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1031643: marked as done (preseeding hostname=foo via the kernel command line seems to be ignored)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:03:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1031643: fixed in preseed 1.115 has caused the Debian Bug report #1031643, regarding preseeding hostname=foo via the kernel command line seems to be ignored to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1034062: marked as done (netcfg prompts for hostname even though preseeded, preventing unattended installation)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:03:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034062: fixed in preseed 1.115 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034062, regarding netcfg prompts for hostname even though preseeded, preventing unattended installation to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Bug#1034062 marked as pending in preseed

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1034062 [netcfg] netcfg prompts for hostname even though preseeded, preventing unattended installation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1034062: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034062 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Processed: Bug#1031643 marked as pending in preseed

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1031643 [preseed] preseeding hostname=foo via the kernel command line seems to be ignored Added tag(s) pending. -- 1031643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031643 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: reassign 1033913 to partman-efi

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1033913 partman-efi Bug #1033913 [partman-auto-lvm] partman-auto-lvm: Broken "Guided - use entire disk and set up LVM" in UEFI mode Bug reassigned from package 'partman-auto-lvm' to 'partman-efi'. No longer marked as found in versions pa

Re: Streamlining d-i releases

Joerg Jaspert (2023-04-09): > > I realize that getting a sudo line on fasolo would mean increasing the > > security risks quite a bunch for a limited gain. Since we already have > > a mechanism to trigger changes in the archive via release team access, > > that is /srv/release.debian.org/www/propo

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Hi, Andrew M.A. Cater (2023-04-09): > That does depend: if you set up from a DVD with no network, then that > may be the result. If you have a working network, then the installer > should offer you the option to include a network mirror. That's a bug report, so both the submitter and the bug rep

Bug#1034117: installation-reports: Debian testing installer doesn't prepare apt sources

Hallo Julian, Julian Groß (2023-04-09): > installing the image linked below, doesn't set up the apt sources. > /etc/apt/sources.list only contains the installation media and nothing > else (not even comments). That's definitely not what's supposed to happen. > Please make sure that any installa

Re: Streamlining d-i releases

On 16824 March 1977, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I realize that getting a sudo line on fasolo would mean increasing the security risks quite a bunch for a limited gain. Since we already have a mechanism to trigger changes in the archive via release team access, that is /srv/release.debian.org/www/pro

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +, Julian Groß wrote: > Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. > > I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. > Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the > sources, but only set u

Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the sources, but only set up the installation media as a source. Having the option for that se

Bug#1034117: installation-reports: Debian testing installer doesn't prepare apt sources

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, installing the image linked below, doesn't set up the apt sources. /etc/apt/sources.list only contains the installation media and nothing else (not even comments). Boot method: USB (ISO via Ventoy) Image version: http://saimei.f