Hi Philip,
Just a gentle ping about the recent patch you shared to fix the issue. Any
chance that the patch would be applied to console-setup?
Thanks and Regards,
Adithya Balakumar
Hi Philip,
>Thanks for putting up with all the (somewhat misguided) questions with such
>patience.
No problem, Your questions were valid.
I should have done a better job in pointing to the place where the tmpkbd.* was
used inside the (initrd) setupcon script instead of just saying that "its
Hi Philip
> Very sorry about the slow reply -- a combination of debconf and family
> holidays being rather distracting.
No problem, Thanks for helping out with this.
> I think I'd looked for that, and failed to find where the file was being
> used.
As I explained before, the created tmp file (t
Hi Philip,
Hope this message finds you well.
I had responded to your queries regarding the behavior of the setupcon script
in my previous update here in the Debian BTS issue. Would like to understand if
that answers your concerns.
I have attached a revised patch here and have also created a MR
Hi Philip,
>So far I've failed to persuade this code to leave a mktemp generated
>name in /etc (or elsewhere), so I'm obviously not running it in the
>correct context. Please explain the circumstances under which this bug
>can be reproduced.
The answer to this lies here[1]. If the `if` condition
Hi Phil,
Thank you so much for your response. Apologies for my delayed response.
>So far I've failed to persuade this code to leave a mktemp generated
>name in /etc (or elsewhere), so I'm obviously not running it in the
>correct context. Please explain the circumstances under which this bug
>can
Hi Anton,
Apologies for my late reply.
> I don't feel myself competent to answer this question.
You are listed as the maintainer of the console-setup package under
packages.debian.org [1]. Hence the question. Is the package maintained by
someone else now ?
On that note, I have also proposed th
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:53:20 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 05:58:05AM +, adithya.balaku...@toshiba-tsip.com
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. Would like to know if the revised
> > patch is acceptable or do you prefer any changes to the
> > patch.
>
> I don'
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:11:52 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:39:55AM +, adithya.balaku...@toshiba-tsip.com
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:18:11 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > >
> > > The solution seem ok. However, I might be overlooking something but it
> >
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:18:11 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:32:55AM +, adithya.balaku...@toshiba-tsip.com
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. Based on the idea above, I have attached a revised
> > patch. Please have a look at the patch and let me know if you
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:47:16 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:38:43AM +, adithya.balaku...@toshiba-tsip.com
> wrote:
> >
> > I may have overlooked a simpler solution to the reproducibility problem I
> > mentioned. I was wondering if we could copy the temporary file to
Hi Anton,
Thanks for the feedback. You raise some valid concerns here.
I may have overlooked a simpler solution to the reproducibility problem I
mentioned. I was wondering if we could copy the temporary file to
/etc/console-setup with a constant name (in [1]). This does not tweak anything
rel
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:13:46 + wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I too am facing this problem with console-setup package. I am trying to
> achieve reproducible builds for a project that I am working on. This
> temporary file name changes across builds which causes reproducibility issues.
>
> Would there be an
Hi,
I too am facing this problem with console-setup package. I am trying to achieve
reproducible builds for a project that I am working on. This temporary file
name changes across builds which causes reproducibility issues.
Would there be any problem with using a fixed name for the temporary fi
14 matches
Mail list logo