Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

2004-06-06 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
as expected. I have even reinstalled win98 just to make sure. Cheers Andree On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 00:04, Andree Leidenfrost wrote: On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:28, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32? Mine is a FAT32 win98 partition. Partman mounts

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

2004-06-06 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Just to reply to my own email: This is apparently fixed in discover1 1.5-10 which hasn't hit Sarge yet (Sarge currently has 1.5-9). Cheers Andree On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 17:49, Andree Leidenfrost wrote: On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: When installing

[d-i daily 040605] Partman offers already assigned mountpoints

2004-06-06 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
first. If people agree I'd be happy to submit a formal bug report for this. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[d-i daily 040605] Potentially misleading DHCP retry screen

2004-06-06 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
: If you answer 'No', you will be prompted to configure the network manually. Best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

2004-05-30 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 13:18, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: scratches his head What else do you need to know apart from: This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. You're right, I must have missed that. Which is more than understandable given your current

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

2004-05-30 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: When installing from i386 daily standard image 045028 I end up with two directories /cdrom0 and /cdrom1. I believe this is in violation of FSH 2.3. The same mount points also exist in /media which is where they really

Bug#251662: os-prober does not detect mounted partitions

2004-05-30 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
-05-30 at 00:01, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: Mounting an existing windows installation (FAT32) in partman causes OS detection to fail, windows is not found. If I don't assign a mount point to the windows partition in partman, OS detection works as expected and windows

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

2004-05-30 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:28, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32? Mine is a FAT32 win98 partition. Partman mounts this just fine. If I do this, however, the described problem occurs. This was a ntfs partition. It does show that the code works

[d-i daily 040528] Unallowed mount points in root directory

2004-05-29 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
this already been reported as a bug? If not, it would be great if someone could tell me what package would create these directories so that I can file a bug. Is that discover1? Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

[d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

2004-05-29 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
this behaviour consistently. This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. I consider this to be a bug. If you agree, I'd be happy to file a bug report if someone could let me know what package to file it against. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia

Re: [d-i daily 040528] Issue with OS detection

2004-05-29 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
scratches his head What else do you need to know apart from: This is with the standard daily i386 iso image, 28 May 04. Cheers Andree On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:01, Joey Hess wrote: Andree Leidenfrost wrote: Mounting an existing windows installation (FAT32) in partman causes OS detection

Bug#240415: i386: Success, some issues

2004-03-27 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
be great. Expert mode is certainly cool, but often one only needs one single feature that the otherwise slick standard installer doesn't have. Best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia

Bug#231083: Additional Info for mandb Issue

2004-02-09 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
of the problem that the extended description had disappeared entirely. Done in man-db 2.4.2-8. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#231083: Additional Info for mandb Issue

2004-02-07 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Colin Just thought I send a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about. Hope it's appropriate to do this against #231083. I can file a new bug against mandb if this is of any help. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia attachment: mandb_screenshot.jpg

d-i beta 2: issue with hostname

2004-02-07 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
as I have also tried 'aurich' which went fine and 'sydney1' which failed again. Best regards Andree PS: I can provide a screenshot if necessary. PPS: I'm not currrently on the list, please cc me when replying. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

d-i beta 2: Wrong time for clock set to UTC

2004-02-07 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
that the RTC is set to UTC whereas the second assumes it's set to local time. Best regards Andree PS: Please cc me in replies as I'm not currently subscribed to the list. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

d-i installer beta 2: Suggestion for fewer screens (apt-installation)

2004-02-07 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
based, I would assume it to be pretty much the same for analog modem. Best regards Andree PS: Please, cc me in replies as I'm not currently on the list. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#231077: installation-reports:

2004-02-04 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#231083: installation-reports: sarge i386 beta2, success but severe glitches

2004-02-04 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
only for the initiated - not read for the average desktop user :-( -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#231077: Disreard, please consider #231083 instead

2004-02-04 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
I'm sorry, sorry, sorry. I seem to have hit a wrong key in evolution and off it went. Please close this bug. The real report is in #231083. Regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#231083: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#231083: installation-reports: sarge i386 beta2, success but severe glitches)

2004-02-04 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
to provide the missing information. If unsure, ask your network administrator. 6) Ask for first missing bit ... EndIf ... Best regards thanks a lot again Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe