ck
the ISO?
Is there any documentation page about this? Everything I found so
far just covers the isolinux bit, which doesn't appear to be
relevant here.
Thanks,
Andy
It works for me, I guess. Dunno about other folks.
I can still do 27th but as I have already stated Isy is now unavailable
until July due to exams.
Please can we make a decision by Tuesday otherwise I'll end up doing
something else....
/Andy
an Isy as she will
be deep into her exams by then. But we'll be ok, given this is just 12.6
(and not a double release)
/Andy
On 19 December 2023 21:25:06 GMT, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Saturday 3rd February (preferred for cadence)
> Saturday 10th February
> Saturday 17th February
>
Isy and I are available for any of those dates. Slight preference for the 3rd
or 10th.
Cheers
Andy
ilable for either
date as she will be doing her mock exams.
Given Isy's exams however, it will not be possible to host the images team in
Cottenham either date, sorry.
All the best
/Andy
>We'll go for 12.1 only on 22nd July, announcements to follow.
>
>
>
Ack. I'm available
/Andy
too
>soon), 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th.
>
>Thanks,
>
I can do 15th, 22nd or 29th
Isy is only available from the 29th (mocks)
Best wishes
/Andy
;Thanks,
>
>Adam
>
>
Isy and I are available on any of those dates.
I am happy to start things off in Steve's absence, not so sure about finishing
up on my own though.
/Andy
not ideal)
- March 26th
- April 2nd
- April 9th
The 19th is awkward for me (and Andy S!) - prior commitments. The
others look OK for me.
Hi Everyone,
I can do the 26th March or the 9th of April.
Sorry the 2nd April is not available for me either
BR
/Andy
h December is a no-go for me, but the 11th and 18th look OK.
Likewise 11th & 18th December are good for us (can't do 4th either)
/Andy & Isy
time as stable it does mean that we don't give the images in the old
stable point release as much testing as perhaps they should because we
are all 'too tired' by the time that we get round to them. that said
that is what the Sunday is for...
/Andy
On 18/07/2021 00:24, Donald Norwood wrote:
Hi!
On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love to confirm
Package: task-kde-desktop
Version: 3.67
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Testing Weekly builds of DI ready for release (build 2021-06-07)
* What exactly did you do
Isy and I can do 12th or 19th.
We have a prior commitment on the 26th... Sorry
/Andy (rattusrattus)
On 30 May 2021 17:41:54 BST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're now a little overdue for 10.10, but it looks like we're ready in
>terms of shim etc. changes, so w
Preferance would be 27th
But can do the others if need be.
/Andy (& Isy)
On 15 March 2021 20:54:45 GMT, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>Hi!
>
>El 15 de marzo de 2021 13:33:15 CET, "Adam D. Barratt"
> escribió:
>>Hi,
>>
>>It's that time again, when
I can do either, it's not like I can go anywhere either weekend :-)
Isy is available to help as well.
/Andy
On 16 January 2021 21:54:25 GMT, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Adam D. Barratt (2021-01-16):
>> Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>>
rt.cgi?bug=975417
Sorry about forgetting to remove part of the reportbug template.
> We have a few days before the window closes for uploads for the
> next Buster point release, so it should be possible.
Hope so!
Thanks,
Andy
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:35:48AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Nov 21 01:02:25 grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install
> --force-extra-removable --force "dummy"
> Nov 21 01:02:25 grub-installer: Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
> Nov 21 01:02:25 grub-i
ll attempt:
https://strugglers.net/~andy/tmp/d-i/
Having experienced this problem when trying to do my "real" install
(largely preseed automated, software RAID, LVM), I did this one
non-automated with priority set to "low" and made it much simpler:
only used /dev/nvme0n1; three
Isy and I can do any of these dates.
We'll keep the dates clear until you announce the point release.
Cheers
On 30 October 2020 19:10:20 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In an attempt to be slightly more efficient than usual at planning a
>point release... it's about a month since 10.6,
ectory and put a file
in there? That wouldn't get clobbered by mdcfg and should get read
by mdadm, without having to alter the mdadm udeb or the mdcfg
component.
Cheers,
Andy
, unless I have missed something.
Cheers,
Andy
Hello,
TL;DR: the Debian installer uses an mdadm.conf located at
/tmp/mdadm.conf.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:18:27PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> I have confirmed that creating a new array from the d-i shell using
> mdadm commands manually does result in a new array without a b
nce the machine was up and running and next reboot this
would be taken care of. But it does not, and I am maybe alone in
wanting this:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg65835.html
Cheers,
Andy
I can do either and have no preferance.
/Andy
On 9 September 2020 19:24:06 BST, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We're slightly off our previous schedule because of delaying 10.5, but
>we should really get on with arranging 10.6.
>
>Please could you confir
g - but how about one of:
>>
>>- August 1st/2nd
>>- August 8th/9th
>
>Either is possible for me, with a preference for the first. Let's not
>delay too long if possible.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Steve
>
>--
>Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
&
whatever date(s) get picked.
>
Preferance would be the weekend of the 18/19 for Isy and me (we have
plans for the weekend before).
/Andy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I can do any of these. Probably best avoid FOSDEM though.
/Andy
On 6 January 2020 21:42:29 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
>for buster and stretch.
>
>I've listed some suggested dates belo
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar
On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press
>aren't
>under too much pressure.
>
>--
>Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
>Debian Developer
Either wfm thanks
On 21 July 2019 00:36:30 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> - August 24th
>
>I have no idea how I missed the event that weekend...
>
>> - Auguest 31st
>> - September 7th
>
>These look like the two options so
Confirmed in DI daily build debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso dated
2019-03-09 11:14
About to test with your patch at
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-lvm/merge_requests/2
(waiting for build)
/Andy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Ben,
I should point out that the system in question never used lvm or lvm2. It
did just fine with plan old disk partitions. I did not "remove" lvm2 in
error, it was never installed. Since when is lvm2 a requirement for
running Debian?
regards,
Andy
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network upgrade from jessie
Image version: network upgrade from jessie
Date: 2017-07-03 16:00 EDT
Machine: ASUS eee pc 900
Partitions:
df -Tl
Filesystem Type 1K-blocksUsed
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.67
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Running debootstrap with --include= and --no-resolve-deps fails with
obvious problem in error message:
E: Couldn't find these debs: 91369800
That number is supposed to be a list of packages, not some crazy big
number.
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
install test
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
installed
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network? CD iso image
Image version: Full URL to image you downloaded is
besthttp://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta4/i386/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b4-i386-netinst.iso
was
not mounted, ejected the card, and tried the grub-install again. This
time it installed on sda as expected.
The reboot went off without a hitch and the system seems correctly
installed.
Thanks,
-andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
of default pin
state for pins wired differently.
Maybe Steve Sakoman can suggest some example boards that will be
difficult to tell apart at runtime, but it matters?
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On 02/23/2011 06:21 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:45:25PM +, Andy Green wrote:
Maybe Steve Sakoman can suggest some example boards that will be
difficult to tell apart at runtime, but it matters?
Here's one example: the Seagate DockStar is very
on all
supported Omap4 boards and so on.
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d64b88f.9000...@linaro.org
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-502a-i386-netinst.iso from debian.org
Date: 2009-09-07 01:55:00
Machine: Dell Inspiron 9300 (Laptop)
Processor: Pentium M, 1.86GHz
Memory: 1GB
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
Output of lspci
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-502a-i386-netinst.iso from debian.org
Date: 2009-09-07 02:51:00
Machine: Dell Inspiron 9300 (Laptop)
Processor: Pentium M, 1.86GHz
Memory: 1GB
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
Change your tiny tool into a massive power drill.
http://sishadowsma.com/
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/
Date: 03 Apr 2007
Machine: Supermicro PDSMi-based rackmount system
Processor: Core2Duo Xeon 2.4GHz
Memory: 4GiB
Partitions: No partitions were created because didn't get that
The original message was received at 1149160914 by alpha.andykirkland.co.uk
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: Sender address not authenticated by Fried Spam)
Below are the details of your message:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
points to etch, links go backwards and
forwards seemingly at random.
Thanks for any help.
--
Andy Ruddock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (GPG Key ID 0x6B50013D)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reportsDebian-installer-version: 13th May 2004 20:00 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: N/ADate: 14th May 2004 13:00Method: cd-rom install, expert26, linux26, expertMachine: Compaq Armada 100sProcessor:AMD
)
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
I hope this means something to somebody.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
up. The last CD boot I did was the
woody install. I can try (a small number) of other images, if you
have any specific suggestions.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
think there is more (the B132L is offline right now and
the C180 is boostrapping Gentoo so I can't check). Then you only
need to add another parameter, like the very reasonable:
stifb=bpp:32
and you're screwed. Been there, done that!
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: debian-installer
Version: beta3
Tags: d-i, sarge
When discover tryies to add the qlogicisp module to the installer kernel,
lsmod reports that qlogicisp is initilazing, and the installer hangs
awaiting for the module install to finish.
I'm working with a Digital Personal Workstation
Package: debian-installer
Version: beta3
Tags: d-i, sarge
When attempting to bring up the network interface after installing the
tulip module, the debian-installer give output similar to:
3
3
3
Then 6) System Error 8) System Errof 4) System Error 5) System Error 1)
System Error 4) System Error
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040315
Tags: d-i, sarge
When discover tryies to add the qlogicisp module to the installer kernel,
lsmod reports that qlogicisp is initilazing, and the installer hangs
awaiting for the module install to finish.
I'm working with a Digital Personal Workstation
installed fine,and after rebooting the
process continued and everything was ok. X11, sound as usual need more
tweaking after the install finishes.
andy
andy - at - cat.org.au
Install logs and other status info is available in
/var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail
not a priority I guess.
andy baxter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's your chance for Cash Freedom
http://90ui89av.com/boris5hco/index.htm
had now nearly elapsed since the night on which he first received life;
his own observations with those made by Aristarchus, and, as we
worked by a spring, allowed to escape into a metal tube.
--
To
using the USB. Is that possible? What should I do?
Thanks,
Andy Lewis
57 matches
Mail list logo
