ink. The installed system (ifupdown, NetworkManager)
already gets this right; it's just the installer that had trouble with
it.
[ Other info ]
This work was requested and sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
diff -Nru netcfg-1.
hout that patch for now, as we need
to rebuild for the new xkb-data to sort out uninstallability in
unstable, and then get the kFreeBSD-removal patch sorted out after that.
Objections?
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:49:34PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> debootstrap's d/control lists the Maintainer as the "Debian Install
> System Team" - that is great. There are also 3 Uploaders listed: Colin
> Watson, Steve McIntyre and Hideki Yamane.
>
> The last contrib
and expect us to support the results, and are
likely to complain about the gaps. So I don't think this can be done
before the freeze (and honestly I think there's enough to do that me
replying more promptly wouldn't have made a significant difference to
that), but there's definitely stuff for people
re (which is
fine, the new debmirror doesn't object), but most people running mirrors
probably run stable rather than testing.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
this path, so it's the main target for
> this change.
But it doesn't. As of your change in pcmciautils 018-13, it uses
/etc/pcmcia/ in the udeb as well. /etc/pcmciautils/ is nonexistent and
should not be referred to in any way.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
n that side of it though
(or I've forgotten), so this one is probably for Holger ...
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
; 11.4 closes over the coming weekend.
Oops, sorry! I've just uploaded this.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
e. If not - just merge it and push the package
> :D
This looks correct to me, thanks. Merged and uploaded.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Nov 2013 10:03:06 +0100
If there's still a similar corner case somewhere that I missed when
looking for this, it should probably be taken up with the apt
maintainers, for the same reason as above.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
I'd like to add that the total
size of /boot/grub/ at least on the buster system I have handy here is
~12MB, about a third of the size of an initramfs - so any system that
close to the wire will probably be in trouble soon anyway.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
using serial output. So I think
either way this is something that would need to be fixed in the
installer. Reassigning there.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
2 maintainers (cc'd). :)
I think that's the thing I fixed upstream here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=ac116bd659b295d3b9e116808d3e1d940dc0fd67
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
>
> Any objections on me uploading this?
Go for it.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
t; Given how close we are to the freeze for 10.3, feel free to upload and
> we'll hold the package in stable-new until KiBi has chance to check it.
OK, uploaded.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
ck on that side, so tagging and CCing
> > appropriately.
>
> No objections, thanks.
Uploaded, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
e containing the binary and config.
Moot given the above, but this isn't actually true - search for
grub-netboot.cfg and memdisk-netboot.fat in build-efi-images.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
stem with [arch=...] foo in its
> /etc/apt/sources.list?
This is all from dubious memory, but I suspect my setup at the time was
roughly an amd64 system with:
deb [arch=amd64]
deb
... on the grounds that my local partial mirror didn't have space for
both amd64
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:56:35PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Colin Watson removed it back in 2011:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/commit/fa965c32ca8bfa2ff14886c6f0dca131532815c7
>
> commit fa965c32ca8bfa2ff14886c6f0dca131532815c7
>
rge to
false). This is to maximise the chance of being able to get this change
into buster with a minimum of controversy of its own. It is of course
simple to change the default behaviour and/or how prominently the
question is presented by way of follow-up changes, if the project so
chooses.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
y=medium
* Make signed packages depend on a matching version of grub-common, in an
attempt to prevent incorrect testing migrations (closes: #924814).
* Cherry-pick from upstream:
- xfs: Accept filesystem with sparse inodes (closes: #924760).
* Minimise writes to EFI variable storage
857dd7a27cd5d621747464bfe71e8727fff
I'll cherry-pick that patch.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
I don't have much advice on fixing it, but I expect that network-console
has a similar problem since it also needs randomness in order to deal
with SSH.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
packages,
> I would like to have uploads for those, but ask for an extra confirmation, if
> the coding changings are uncritical for me to upload.
As far as I know all the ones where you've listed my name are fine to
upload.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
if they
aren't, rather than assuming that they must be mounted.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:50:26PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:47:18AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think this would be clearer reversed, i.e.:
> >
> > DEB_FRONTENDS=passthrough text newt
> > UDEB_FRONTENDS=passthrough text new
to keep the package contents identical regardless of build
profile, since the main build system won't handle it in this case due to
the change in *_FRONTENDS?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
of them earlier, I can see how annoying that
> can be. No objections, but I'd be happy to hear about other uploaders.
No objections here either.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
eview but I hope it does not end up
> being stalled because nobody wants to review those changes. It's not clear
> to me who is that person. In the iso-scan changelog, you are the last
> non-translation committer and before that it was Otavio Salvador/Colin
> Watson in 2012... in the hd-me
ot;/hd-media/$iso_to_try", rather than relying on it being in the current
directory; you then won't need either "cd /hd-media" or "cd /" in this
function.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
Nit: it's worth ">/dev/null 2>&1" here, as "type" writes to stderr if
the command isn't available, and that's probably just noise in the logs.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
ight to share on this.
I could go either way on this, but I think it would probably make most
sense to exclude partitions already in use by VGs. "list-devices
partition" is generally used to offer menus of partitions to find
various files on, for which in-use PVs aren't going to be eligible
Control: tag 860545 pending
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:11:49PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-07-24 15:06 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:17:37PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote:
> >> Looks like debootstrap uses bashisms, but is shebanged to /bin/sh.
&g
s have you observed?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
d to me, though at this point it might be worth refactoring
that conditional a bit to assign the grep output to a local variable to
avoid the repeated subprocess invocations.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
y're a pain to
maintain and tend to bitrot.
> commit 08cfa29937f3dfbe796cab4d7e05bf2dd8808f40
> Author: Colin Watson <colin.wat...@canonical.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 26 20:08:41 2017 +0200
>
> Update translations for using hdparm
>
> Those changes should be done in d-i master po files
This should be d
I'm not going to close this with my Ubuntu hat on, but I think that d-i
folks should decline this patch. For the reasons given above, it's
worse for both Debian and Ubuntu.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
(1:7.4p1-9) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix null pointer dereference in ssh-keygen; this fixes an autopkgtest
+regression introduced in 1:7.4p1-8.
+
+ -- Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:43:15 +
+
openssh (1:7.4p1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix ssh-
Checking both adds only negligible security (look up "multicollisions")
and is a waste of time.
The usual reason to keep support for older hash algorithms is just to
make transitions to newer ones less painful.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
s depends on how the uploader happened to invoke the Debian source
package building tools. You should be prepared to cope with either.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
once the
general shape of things is working.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
exiting
>
> As written above: It worked until about two weeks ago.
Is there a "bootmgr" file (regardless of case) at the top level of the
Windows file system? Can you attach the "/boot/bcd" file (again,
regardless of case) from the Windows file system?
Thanks,
--
C
boot.conf. This patch
> fixes this parsing bug.
I don't really understand why this only applies to the "append" option
(I suspect that in fact it doesn't), but whatever - this will do for
now. I converted your patch to POSIX sed syntax and applied it.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
Source: grub2
Source-Version: 2.02~beta3-1
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:56:46PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> (2016-11-26):
> > Yep, as Thomas said, this changed back to the original state in
> > 2.02~beta3. I think that in fact allow
/commit/?id=496cca85259c77b5fc8ad39a9064c83c3a39b7a6
(Sorry, I forgot that d-i had worked around this.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:33:57PM +0800, river wrote:
> I just found that in Jessie, package glibc-pic in the build dependencies of
> debian-installer actually doesn't exists.
It's a virtual package, provided by (depending on architecture)
libc6-pic or similar.
--
Colin
ron job you ran into.
> [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/i18n/
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/i18n/ch01s04.html#idm45330184357456 is
the bit that's particularly relevant here, I think.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
ntax.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/tree/doc/devel/partman-auto-recipe.txt
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
pport offers no advantage at all.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
nstalling
grub-efi-amd64 and removing grub-pc; you wouldn't need to redo the
installation.
That would give most of the benefits you're looking for, albeit at the
cost of a bit of documentation, without needing to break the "only one
installed boot loader thinks that it owns the system boot process" rule.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
It skips checksums that
are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it
successfully finds. Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of
net-retriever?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
to
tell exactly what's going on without the exact text of the error message
you're seeing, though.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
ate.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
-1.39ubuntu1/net-retriever 2014-11-17 16:30:25.0
+
@@ -86,6 +86,12 @@
exit 1
}
+# Nasty hack to remove duplicates in Packages file.
+deduplicate () {
+ /usr/lib/net-retriever/deduplicate <"$1" >"$1.new"
+ mv "$1.new" "$1"
+}
+
cmd="$1"
shift
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
and sending it upstream;
it should only be on the order of a hundred lines.
I'd be happy to cherry-pick such a patch into the Debian packaging once
it has been committed upstream.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
to an initramfs hook would
probably be unwise. flash-kernel already seems to check for
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, so you could just set that in
flash-kernel-installer.postinst when calling flash-kernel.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org
15:44:41.0 +0100
+++ parted-3.2/debian/changelog 2015-03-19 10:58:59.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+parted (3.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Phillip Susi ]
+ * Cherry pick upstream patch to fix a crash when resizing fat16
+(LP: #1342255).
+
+ [ Colin Watson ]
+ * Drop
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:05:02AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Should we unblock grub2 2.02~beta2-21 as it stands, or are there any
possible issues that should be tackled before we consider unblocking it?
Yes, this should be fine. I've filed an unblock request (#780018).
--
Colin Watson
Linux kernel on a 32-bit EFI (closes:
+#775202).
+
+ [ Colin Watson ]
+ * Use mtmsr rather than mtmsrd in ppc64el-disable-vsx.patch, since the
+VSX Available bit is in the lower half of the MSR anyway, and mtmsrd
+faults on 32-bit systems (closes: #776400).
+
+ -- Colin Watson cjwat
that
configure the Essential set in slightly different orders (based on a
patch from Michael Tautschnig; see #766459 and #767999).
-- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:44:29 +
This doesn't preclude fixing this in depth in other ways (e.g. a
debootstrap change in stable), so I'm
Control: reassign -1 grub-common
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org [141106 16:06]:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:53:58PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Please add the splash option to the Linux default command line
the isinstallable script for a given
package potentially many times. Also, partman-efi isn't a main-menu
item so any isinstallable script added to it will never be run.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
. There may of course still be
fdisk-style tools that are behind the times on this, but that's their
problem.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
it has
coordination issues we should make some effort to smooth the transition
rather than just going straight for it.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:30:45PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I uploaded this live-installer patch to Ubuntu. It should be
straightforward to apply in Debian once my attr patch or similar is
applied.
* Copy extended attributes to target system (LP: #1302192).
My attr patch has been
for the
netcfg/target_network_config settings that require it. Then this may
just work for you if you don't have network-manager installed, and
otherwise you can use:
d-i netcfg/target_network_config select ifupdown
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org
be more correct.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140812224551.gl5
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:26:56AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi. Could this issue also affect the grub installer udeb?
Not directly. But of course it's possible you manually partitioned
wrongly in some way.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:24:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:26:56AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi. Could this issue also affect the grub installer udeb?
Not directly. But of course it's possible you manually partitioned
wrongly in some way.
Well, it's
for the inconvenience casued by all this; I clearly didn't
test the new upstream version of parted well enough. I will sort all
this out as quickly as I can.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
at
/var/log/partman, which has a full trace of all the parted_server
commands issued, the replies to them, and various other information. I
tracked this down quite quickly using that by reference to the code.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org
no longer be an issue now - I fixed the unversioned
Conflicts four years ago - so the parted 3.1 packaging will just use
libparted2 rather than libparted2debian1.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
*. No compatibility hacks in GRUB 2 are involved
here. Changes to the grub2_* functions can't break GRUB Legacy.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
to master after an installation test, thanks. I'll work on the
other bits of this ASAP as well.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
resizing operations; I suspect it would end up needing to
be filesystem-specific.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:57:38AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 01:59:26PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
---
check.d/check_basicfilesystems | 15 +++---
commit.d/format_basicfilesystems | 45
+---
debian/changelog
a shame to remove a feature, but there
doesn't seem to be an obvious alternative at the moment. It can of
course return if somebody figures out the necessary code to deal with
the necessary resizing operations; I suspect it would end up needing to
be filesystem-specific.
--
Colin Watson
of a debootstrap run with
such packages.
Thanks; I've applied these patches to git.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:02:53PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org (2014-04-14):
I heard about a parted regression this morning and fixed it more or less
immediately:
parted (2.3-20) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix crash when opening FAT file systems
I heard about a parted regression this morning and fixed it more or less
immediately:
parted (2.3-20) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix crash when opening FAT file systems (LP: #1306704).
-- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:44:43 +0100
This was a consequence of the fix
this is probably going to be simpler than adding xattr
support to busybox tar (in GNU tar that depends on a specific archive
format, so I'm guessing it's not exactly trivial). Even if we did go
for the latter approach instead, we'd probably still need at least a
libattr1-udeb.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
--
Colin
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:19:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org (2014-04-09):
Would it make sense to modify attr to build udebs, then change
live-installer to do a getcap/setcap run after transferring files with
tar? I think this is probably going
@@ -94,7 +104,7 @@
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb -p$(package) -- -Zbzip2 -z9
dh_builddeb -p$(develop) -- -Zbzip2 -z9
- dh_builddeb -p$(library)
+ dh_builddeb -p$(library) -p$(udeb) -p$(libudeb)
binary: binary-indep binary-arch
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
chdir /
eval ${SUPPORT}_teardown
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 03:55:45AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
any objection to dropping ia64 from this package? Commenting it like
that was done for hppa would seem the way to go (at least to me), but
I'm happy to read any comments about that.
Sounds sensible to me.
--
Colin Watson
in ped_disk_new_fresh rather than ped_disk_new.
- Temporarily set disk-dev-loop to 0 while removing partitions, so
that we can remove previously-existing non-loop partitions (thanks,
Phillip Susi).
-- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:01:13 +0100
--
Colin Watson
changing the
behaviour back upstream, but the thread petered out a bit and I don't
believe it's done yet.)
[BTW the tag for -7 isn't to be found in the git repository right now.]
Sure is, it's just called debian/2.02.beta2-7 because git.
--
Colin Watson
callers might be affected as well).
Does that look OK to you?
It's not ideal, but I think it's reasonable for now, yes.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
shorter.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140312133434.ga6
that just makes the transition more complicated. Unless there is
a reason beyond aesthetics to move ext2 support, I think we should leave
it where it is.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
. Or
you can even just supply the changelog entry separately without the
header/trailer lines and let the committer fill that in, to reduce the
probability of conflicts.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:02:16AM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
On 3/12/2014 9:34 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
I think it would be very helpful to split up the logical chunks of
this.
Moving ext2 support means that we need to make sure that
partman-basicfilesystems and partman-ext3 land
that the cause for this is by any means unique
to espeakup.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
against testing udebs lets me reproduced
this issue, and that adding d-i-utils' binaries to localudebs after
having reverted this change fixes speech synthesis.
commit 9c6685364a56697ea9c590e1bc93a73ade88b679
Author: Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org
Date: Fri Feb 7 17:07:46 2014 +
log
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:12:43AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
In the meantime, I'm reverting my change from 1.103 for now since this
is all pretty tricky, although I'm fairly convinced that this is just
masking other bugs. So be it, I suppose.
Uploaded:
debian-installer-utils (1.106
to consider something with
ca-certificates, but I felt that was overkill for now and it certainly
involved more thinking about policy than I wanted to do.)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:04:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm working on adding HTTPS support to d-i. Now, I know that we already
have integrity by way of the GPG signature chain, but this isn't for
that; this is in response to feedback Canonical has had from some Ubuntu
customers
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:05:44PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:04:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm working on adding HTTPS support to d-i. Now, I know that we already
have integrity by way of the GPG signature chain
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:22:26PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.02.14 15:56, Colin Watson wrote:
All I have left to say is that the admins in question are my customers,
so, the company is not your customer, but its admins are?
Oh, whatever. I'm not interested in this kind
that on the hostname that
is not ftp.TLD.debian.org, while I think it now only shows that
name?
Yeah. It's not clear that this makes sense for role name hosting across
trust domains ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
1 - 100 of 1152 matches
Mail list logo
