On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 03:22 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Drew, such conversion from xsfbs to dh should really be accompanied
> by
> a thorough debdiff check:
>
> $ debdiff --controlfiles=ALL ../libxcursor*changes
>
> which makes the breakage obvious:
> > Shlibs files of package
Christian PERRIER a écrit:
There's one: the LANGUAGE variable. ...
Northern Sami fallsback successively to:
- Norwegian Bokmal
- Norwegian Nynorsk
- Danish
- Swedish
Ah, that sounds like a good mechanism. I am satisfied :)
turned out to be sensitive: Ukrainian was falling back to
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first release
candidate release of the installer for Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze.
...
* Localization:
...
* 70 languages activated (included English);
* For 57 of these,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:39:22AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I fail to see why this
would be a problem or is, indeed, relevant.
I'm sorry, Wouter, it's not clear to me
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I fail to see why this
would be a problem or is, indeed, relevant.
I'm sorry, Wouter, it's not clear to me that you correctly read the
problem I was describing.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:54:24AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
You're taking it too disastrously. The problem I'm trying to solve is
when the max mount count is reached, this is the case in which the
forced fscks becomes annoying
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:40:17AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Robert wrote:
as far as i know it's also possible to set the counter to a specific
value, which might be better. so make them all be checked after 20
maounts
Robert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:40:05PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
partition on every 20 mounts, the second on every 21, and so
Wouter wrote:
The problem then is when the partitions hit the forced-fsck mark, with
the default settings they all have to go through their fsck at the same
time. It takes time, and when all you had intended to do was to resume
out of suspend to quickly check some data, but came up against
Hi debian-installer people,
Partitions have a counter so that an fsck is forced on them at reboot
after they have have mounted as certain number of times (I think it's
after 20 or 30 mounts).
The last time I checked, on a default installation with multiple
partition this forced fsck occured
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 09:57 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 19 June 2006 08:40, Drew Parsons wrote:
The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
partition on every 20 mounts, the second on every 21
Hi,
I've just created the woody install CDs using jigdo on the files from
http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/current/jigdo/i386 (the Europe
link from http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/ for the official files).
The README.txt and README.html have not been updated for the final release.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:40:17PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
...
I just tested it on all the bootable x86 systems in my house:
...
Toshiba 490CDT
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
...
I just tested it on all the
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 03:46:13AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Here's a provisional list of packages which are standard or higher and
should not be:
exim we should move to postfix, IMHO
Just for education's sake, what are the reasons you hold this opinion?
I use exim simply
15 matches
Mail list logo
