On Friday 08 May 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:50:48PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Other option would be to group the include templates, e.g.:
pkgsel/include - pkgsel/include/packages (or
pkgsel/include/package-list) pkgsel/install-recommends -
pkgsel/include/install
On Friday 08 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
I suspect something from the kernel packages...
Not even close...
Template: partman/exception_handler
That template has been there since forever. Errors are from libparted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
I just noticed the following change:
+pkgsel (0.25) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Merge from Ubuntu:
+- Allow preseeding pkgsel/install-recommends to install what the
+ packages on pkgsel/include Recommend, defaulting to false (Timo
+ Aaltonen, LP: #315363).
IMO
On Monday 04 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
2) this then needs to be reviewed by multiple DDs (using the new
tools)
Is there a way, with that step, to know *how many* left messages there
are?
The page where you select a mailing list shows how many nominated messages
there are to be
-- Forwarded Message --
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
The reason this bug happens is because CONFIG_PROM_CONSOLE is enabled
in the kernel.
It unconditionally gets registered as a real console before the Sun
Hypervisor console driver has a chance to register. The
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
* sarge-support
* vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)?
* sysconfig-writer
* linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
Can these safely be removed from the repository?
None of these should be removed.
The *only* one which could
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
This one actually could be removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 12:38:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being removal
of packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the
official archive anymore:
Since when is d-i
have. And as I'm the
author and only listed uploader of the package I think I'm entitled to a
rather heavy say in this...
It could make sense to move all codename-support packages under a subdir
if ppl think they clutter up the packages dir too much.
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote
Hi all,
Yes, I do mean all: D-I team, D-I users, lurkers, everybody!
Now that the listmasters have created a working toolset to actually remove
spam from the mailing list archives [1], it seems like a good idea to
make a coordinated effort to clean spam from the list archives.
The removal of
On Friday 10 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
There have been a few changes in the installation guide that are
relevant for Lenny and important enough to consider a stable update.
Added benefit is that the Vietnamese translation, which missed the
Lenny release, can probably be enabled again
Hi,
I've uploaded an update for the Installation Guide for stable.
The changes from the previous version are not huge, but there have been a
number of fixes, clarifications and additions, including new sections on
accessibility support in D-I and improved documentation on installing
On Sunday 19 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Please provide an improved proposed patch.
Here it is.
Thanks. The context is now clear as well.
I still feel this gives more importance to this issue than is warranted.
I'd therefore like to go with the following alternative patch, which moves
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, aara...@cenditel.gob.ve wrote:
The command I want to execute is:
cryptsetup -y create private /dev/sda5
which does not have an noninteractive mode.
Just use a redirect:
echo $PASSWORD | cryptsetup -y create private /dev/sda5
or:
cryptsetup -y create private
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 17 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
The following 6 translations are now complete:
Chinese (simplified), Czech, French, German, Portuguese (PT), Russian
And now also Italian.
Also complete now: Greek, Japanese and Swedish.
Current [1] status
(Translators for missing languages BCC'ed.)
On Friday 17 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
For this release, translators are requested to update their
translations. The deadline is in two weeks: *** Sunday April 26 ***.
Here's the status after a week
reassign 525209 cdebconf 0.140
severity 525209 serious
thanks
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I just noticed that the layout is messed up in daily images:
- There is no longer a space between the last item and go back,
which by itself looks ok:
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
This is almost certainly a result of the cdebconf changes committed by
Nicolas François (CCed).
Although the new version of newt uploaded a few days ago could also be a
factor (and possibly even the slightly older slang2 update).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
While digging through d-i, I've noticed some signs of ppc64 port
(which was, as far as I remember, a heroic attempt to make a 64-bit
userland Debian port).
Do we actually need it and is anybody
On Monday 20 April 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
In setting up everything on the powerbook, I did not trouble myself to
re-enable the miboot builds anymore, since I understand they've been
long broken and nobody is working on them;
Agreed.
and, also, since I can't
seem to find the miboot
tags 524877 wontfix
thanks
On Monday 20 April 2009, Santiago Vila wrote:
Is there a way to put debian-501-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso or
later inside an USB stick so that the USB stick may be used to install
either Debian/i386 or Debian/amd64?
If so, it would be great if the install guide
On Saturday 18 April 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think the ability to symlink the kernel or initrd will also be useful
to me when I start to consider cdrom-xen variants for both i386 and
amd64. i386 cannot share the kernel (needs 686-bigmem variant) but can
share the initrd with some small
On Saturday 18 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
The attached patch adds documentation for the use of TERM= for serial
consoles.
Is this really useful given that D-I only supports ansi, bterm, linux and
vt102 (for a default install that is and AFAICT)?
That would at the very least need to be
On Sunday 19 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Frans Pop, le Sun 19 Apr 2009 00:08:37 +0200, a écrit :
Is this really useful given that D-I only supports ansi, bterm, linux
and vt102 (for a default install that is and AFAICT)?
That's already much better than only dumb emulation.
AFAICT D
On Friday 10 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
For this release, translators are requested to update their
translations. The deadline is in two weeks: *** Sunday April 26 ***.
Here's the status after a week, with a bit over one week left to go.
The following 6 translations are now complete:
Chinese
On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
* NetworkManager is used on most distros (and Debian as well) for
desktop installations. NetworkManager always use wpasupplicant for
interaction with wireless networks so now both wpasupplicant and the
drivers have been quite tested.
On Monday 13 April 2009, Xavier Oswald wrote:
I don't want to work if the idea of adding game will not be accepted by
the team.
I don't think there are any objections in principle, but IMO there should
be a few conditions:
- games shall only be loaded as additional components and only if the
On Saturday 11 April 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
After installing from the default CD (e.g. businesscard) I'd like to
make other session managers than Gnome available. (e.g. xfce or kde).
For i386 and amd64 you can now select a different desktop environment from
the isolinux boot menu (with
There have been a few changes in the installation guide that are relevant
for Lenny and important enough to consider a stable update. Added benefit
is that the Vietnamese translation, which missed the Lenny release, can
probably be enabled again.
I plan to make this the only stable update, so
On Monday 06 April 2009, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I see the path suggested in 4.4, but nothing about the partition.
OK. I've committed an additional change to cover that.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-04-07 21:37]:
The syslog shows:
Mar 6 17:19:36 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
(/dev/mapper/kronos0-root), cannot install grub
Which is confirmed by the hardware summary, which does not show
tags 509371 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thanks for the the review! I'm OK with your changes.
Committed now.
Thanks a lot for providing the initial patch and your quick responses to
my not so quick review. It's a good addition to the manual.
It would be
Let's move this subthread back to d-boot. Reply-to set.
Please let us know if you'd like to be CCed.
Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-04-07 02:54]:
Martin Wuertele wrote:
Actually lilo is installed by lenny d-i if you use root-sw-raid with
LVM, even if your /boot
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
partman/early_command doesn't work as described in the manual. The
command is never executed (no log entry for even trying), and when I
'grep'ed for partman/early_command on the install media there were no
hits. It looks like it is missing.
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Data from /var/log/installer is available at
http://asteria.debian.or.at/~maxx/.var_log_installer.tar.gz
The syslog shows:
Mar 6 17:19:36 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
(/dev/mapper/kronos0-root), cannot install grub
Which is confirmed
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Kevin Schwartz wrote:
After reading through this link I thought that the
partman/early_command was supported in Lenny:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/example-preseed.txt
Ah, OK. That means there is a bug in the script that generates that file
as, given the
On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
I think s/uploads/updates + uploads/ is what they had in mind. I also
think the part about translation updates is only to not wait for them,
not to just skip them.
Yes, I understood that. And IMHSHO that would be a serious mistake: an
empty change for
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I think that last part is debatable.
I do not have time to manage the
volunteered for. However, post-meeting, Frans Pop indicated
that he's not comfortable with that approach that doesn't fit his work
s/that doesn't/as it doesn't/
s/his/the current/
method. As Frans is doing a great job maintaining the installation
guide, his way to organize the work should
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hey, let's make one thing clear OK; You're de facto the maintainer and
the RM of the installer manual and I fully agree with that but please
realise that the manual is part of Debian Installer project.
Sure, but that does not change anything.
On Monday 06 April 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one
aspect of doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something
that you really *must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain
On Monday 06 April 2009, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
[...] I'm unsure if he trust me enough to do an upload if
needed (or if D-I Team also sees me as the backup guy for
D-I Manual).
trust is the wrong word here.
Currently I would not like you to do a release without me being
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
(I don't do this that often either; grep in existing docs is your
friend.)
Yes, it doesn't work very well in the installation guide, but it does
in the release notes indeed.
Well, it works for me even for the manual :-)
Here is an updated
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Similarly, the installation guide could be uploaded more often, of
course without translation freeze. That would help better spotting
issues, errors or missing parts, hopefully.
Speaking as the person who has done 90% of the work on the manual
tags 519508 pending
thanks
On Friday 13 March 2009, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
In section 5.1.3, if using GRUB, the procedure says to add lines
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/vmlinuz
initrd (hd0,0)/boot/newinstall/initrd.gz
This will of course only work if the files were copied to
tag 518018 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
What is working is the following:
echo -n r00tme | mkpasswd -s -m md5
because echo then omits the \n which would end up into the hash
otherwise...
Thanks for reporting René.
I've used 'printf' instead of 'echo -n'
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Two patches are attached for your consideration.
- partman-auto-recipe.txt.patch
a few suggested grammatical changes
Committed. Thanks.
- preseed.xml
it is now possible to preseed multiple disks
try to enhance
tag 509372 pending
thanks
On Sunday 21 December 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
There is a typo in the japanese translation, here is a patch.
Applied. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Samuel,
On Sunday 21 December 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Here is a patch that adds to installation-guide two accessibility
sections: in the supported hardware section, provide urls to lists
of supported braille displays and speech syntheses, and in the boot
section, document the boot
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 08 Mar 2009 03:16:56 +0100, a écrit :
Ping?
Ping timeout.
No. The timeout was at least 20 minutes after you sent this.
And more probably 2 days as that would have made it a full month.
;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Here is an updated patch.
Thanks.
Frans Pop, le Mon 06 Apr 2009 02:19:15 +0200, a écrit :
Note that for arches that do not support an accessibility option at
all (s390 comes to mind), the text should be suppressed anyway.
I'm not sure how
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Frans Pop, le Mon 06 Apr 2009 03:04:59 +0200, a écrit :
General spelling error: s/speech syntheses/speech synthesis/
Well, I actually wanted to use the plural form.
Why? IMO that's incorrect English in this context.
Mmm, maybe I need
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Frans Pop, le Mon 06 Apr 2009 03:04:59 +0200, a écrit :
Frans Pop, le Mon 06 Apr 2009 02:19:15 +0200, a écrit :
Note that for arches that do not support an accessibility option
at all (s390 comes to mind), the text should be suppressed
On Monday 06 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Yes. E.g. 'arch=x86,alpha,hppa'
I can't make it work. the parser wants quotes, and with quotes it
does not interpret the commas.
And, yes, quotes are required. So:
arch=x86;alpha;hppa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
nonsense.
No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort.
As you seem to think that a change is needed and would improve things, it
would be nice if you could explain, in
On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
nonsense.
No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort.
Please stop that hostility.
What hostility
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'm starting to think that we could benefit of a specific flavour for
it. What others think?
IMO sound support is completely outside the normal scope of the installer
and substantially increasing the size of the initrd and memory
requirements
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Why are we providing framebuffer drivers for a graphical installer?
That's insane too. As I reported earlier the added size to the initrd
for sound+speech synthesizer is 2MB.
Which is an increase by 1/6!
The main issue for me is that it makes
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] Just unpack the additional udebs into a different tree while
letting library reduction include both trees, as we already do for
EXTRAUDEBS.
Well, it's probably going to be a bit more complex than that as I suspect
mklibs may copy any libraries
Hi Rick,
On Thursday 26 March 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
following results (manually typed from the ALT-F4 screen):
kernel: wget: segfault at ... error 7 in libresolv-2.9.so
The daily built images are currently seriously broken for various
architectures. Please don't waste too much time on
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a
led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it. To
make it buildable.
How big is it? What are the dependencies?
If it is small enough (which seems likely, why
On Thursday 26 March 2009, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a
led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it.
To make it buildable.
How big
On Monday 23 March 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
18:28 otavio dato: i belive that we could check for any non-udeb
dependency. AFAIK no package should have them now.
Almost true, but not quite. See my early mails about getting rid of the
dependencies on libc6 and the udeb
On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
wedge. Maybe that was because i386 was the only one back then though
and for two arches kernel-wedge makes sense. The only other (currently)
potential arch is ia64 though.
IMO
On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
wedge. Maybe that was because i386 was the only one back then
though
.
Cheers,
FJP
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/19/154
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Required sequence to set wireless parameters? (was:
2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28)
Date: Thursday 19 March 2009
From: John W. Linville em...@somewhere.xxx
To: Frans Pop em
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
This may be of interest to Glenn Saberton and others intending to
improve wireless support in D-I. The message was taken from a
discussion on the Linux Kernel Mailing List [1].
See also the other replies to my post in that thread.
[1] http
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
$ host asus
asus has address 192.168.0.1
$ ping asus
ping: unknown host asus
Maybe there are some issues in libresolv.so.2 ?
Isn't it more likely there are issues in your local network setup?
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Fabien Boucher wrote:
The entry is correctly add in /etc/modprobe/blacklist.local but the
module is loaded ...
So it seems that udev doesn't take care of
/etc/modprobe/blacklist.local.
I tested this a few days ago in VirtualBox for the pcnet32 driver and the
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
As far as I can see, from base-installer's point of view, this was just
for consistency with live-installer rather than to fix a particular
bug. Could we put it back the way it was, please? We could define
base-installer.d hooks as before any
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
I just rather belatedly noticed that r53756 breaks console-setup (or at
least will once we switch to it and console-setup is installed by
debootstrap).
BTW
Do we really want console-setup installed by debootstrap?
Is it needed on completely
Do we really want console-setup installed by debootstrap?
Is it needed on completely headless systems such as NAS devices or
systems with only a dumb console such as S/390?
Or in chroots for that matter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Lucas Brasilino wrote:
I'm trying to reconstruct etch's d-i to use de latest kernel
available, since it's available at
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/
The fact that udebs are in pool does not mean they are available when
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Lucas Brasilino wrote:
Is there any tag/branch from d-i svn which I can checkout the lenny
'etchnhalf' code ?
It *is* the Lenny installer, so the lenny branch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
tag 518088 pending
thanks
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
This patch fixes a problem using mklibs for SPARC64. The psABI for
this platform involves undefined, null-name symbols of type
STT_SPARC_REGISTER describing how registers are used by objects, which
are not of any
On Monday 02 March 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Hmmm, I can't check right now (offline) but I don't remember seeing
mention of m68k builds on
On Monday 02 March 2009, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Ping. This patch
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/09/msg00860.html is pending
review.
Can you submit a bug report against mklibs with the patch? That makes it a
lot easier to keep track of things.
Please remember to set the 'patch' tag.
reassign 517644 choose-mirror
severity 517644 serious
thanks
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I attempted to install 'etch' on this system using the 'lenny'
installer. I did this via the preseeding method, passing the
suite=etch
option to the boot line of
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I attempted to install 'etch' on this system using the 'lenny'
installer. I did this via the preseeding method, passing the
suite=etch
option to the boot line of the installer
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Now that the lenny release is over, I think it's time for all of us to
gather and discuss what the D-I team currently is and what should be
done for the lenny-squeeze release cycle (not technically speaking
but first more on organisational
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I am not tagging the bug +patch because the problem probably needs to
be solved by a different patch in Lenny and in the main branch, see
below. I also lack the time to do proper testing (and also to 1prepare
the needed stable updates).
I'm not
On Saturday 28 February 2009, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
It seems that /etc/udeb-source contains unstable in the lenny
mini.iso. Since the udebs are downloaded via the network when using
mini.iso, the installer ends up pulling in udebs from current unstable
and failing due to some recently
Please reply to the BTS and not to people privately!
On Thursday 26 February 2009, you wrote:
On 2/26/09, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
M. McGowan, le Wed 25 Feb 2009 17:01:58 -0500, a écrit :
When I select a graphical install
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Chris Carr wrote:
Is it possible to arrange this so that if any requirement for the
graphical installer is unmet (I'm thinking primarily of RAM), the
installer quietly falls back to text mode without inconvenience to the
user?
It already does that. If a system
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Enrico Zini wrote:
Why don't nodm config/postinst scripts see the values that have been
preseeded earlier?
nodm gets installed too early: during debootstrap.
preseeding info is only propagated to the /target environment in the early
stages of pkgsel, i.e. just
On Monday 16 February 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
It was done on purpose: it was easier to support common d-i support
operations (e.g. anna-install openssh-client-udeb) that way.
Hmmm. For me it seems more important to provide a shell that will work for
things _users_ would want to do than
On Monday 16 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
I'd suggest trying to build special netboot-style images with all
udebs included, of course, if that's technically feasible.
I think you mean 'monolithic' images. That is the _only_ type of image
that's actually going to include all built
On Monday 16 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@alioth.debian.org):
+ No file systems have been mounted for you.
Could we use this opportunity to drop this for you. It doesn't add
much information and I always find this quite clumky. I don't really
see
On Monday 16 February 2009, pabs wrote:
ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts
ttf-arphic-*
These don't appear to be used by the installer.
Correct, Neither of these fonts is used by the installer anymore. No
objection from the D-I team to remove them from the archive.
And if they are kept in the archive,
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The script itself is not yet (it still lacks debian-installer
building) but it already does a good job for rest of packages.
Have you ever looked
On Monday 16 February 2009, Christoph Haas wrote:
I just tried the official Lenny CD #1 for i386 in VirtualBox and still
can't install LXDE. The choice of alternative desktop environments
during the boot seems to be gone. And later tasksel just offers the
Desktop task.
Perfect: everything is
On Monday 16 February 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
The necessary improvements are attached, and I can commit these once
Giuseppe has uploaded this to unstable. I don't think we should
simplify it by throwing out the old output-comparison code yet, since
that would presumably cause problems for
On Monday 16 February 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
This broke daily builds as the new udeb is awaiting NEW processing.
I've marked it as optional for now.
Sorry about that. I guess I wasn't thinking of daily builds as a huge
priority right now :-)
Well, it also broke a local build I was
On Monday 16 February 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
The attached patch (against the Ubuntu package, but it doesn't make
much difference) implements this. I've tested it and it seems to be
working rather well. However, I'm interested in other people's thoughts
before going ahead and committing it
On Monday 16 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The way buildscript does is completely different the way I was thinking
about doing it. The script calls cowbuilder to make all required stuff
in a chroot not messing with the machine where we're building it.
That is probably of some benefit.
On Monday 16 February 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
What's not addressed by this is the case of a language being activated
with its translations suddenly flowing down to dozens of packages
(case for Kazakh last week).
It looks like you skipped over one para in my mail:
! The *only* valid
On Monday 16 February 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
The or if you add more disks also makes no sense in the context of
your patch.
Sure it does; if you add more disks, you can add new physical volumes
on them and easily extend your volume group. This is pretty standard
LVM operation.
Yes, it
On Monday 16 February 2009, Eric Cooper wrote:
As far as I can tell, this image does not contain any network drivers.
This has absolutely nothing to do with this bug report! Please report your
issue separately, but first verify that you are doing things correctly.
hd-media/boot.img.gz indeed
On Monday 16 February 2009, Eric Cooper wrote:
I booted from the memory stick, and chose the basic install. After
searching the local disks, it reported that it couldn't find any ISO
images and said I'd have to net boot (fine).
Right, so that is where your install went wrong. You'll have to
On Monday 16 February 2009, Eric Cooper wrote:
I suggest changing only to first. And perhaps the paragraph
beginning After that, mount the USB memory stick could be
emphasized somehow (bold face or whatever).
I've changed it to To use this image you simply extract it directly to
your
1101 - 1200 of 6277 matches
Mail list logo
