Re: Bug#395262: choose-mirror: requires internet access to build

Frans Pop wrote: > I still think your setup is what's broken here. Why would you want outside > DNS resolution if you can't reach anywhere anyway? FWIW I once saw such a setup used so that logresolve could be used. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: Installation report (i386); second-stage lost settings

I wrote: > Installation goes fine but second-stage lost all my first-stage > choices. Reinstalled; choosing sarge. Second stage is ok, in French. But (something I failed to mention in my previous message) I'm shown the main menu (as if debconf priority was medium) instead of going automatically

Installation report (i386); second-stage lost settings

Hello, I just netbooted on i386 (with etherboot); the following files: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/2.6/vmlinuz http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/2.6/initrd.gz Thanks to http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerMknbi Installation goes

Modifying d-i to replicate hosts

Hello, Our local LUG (BxLUG, http://www.bxlug.be) is engaged to help setup a few training rooms. We used to do this with replicator (package already in Debian) but with d-i progress I wondered how difficult it would be to replace base-installer with another udeb whose job would be to rsync an exi