* "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-24 13:15:08 +0100]:
> Or perhaps more the _packaging_. Debian has lots and lots of software
> packaged, most of which is of extremely good quality. The Debian
> policy is IMO a lot more important than using a specific package
> system.
Yeah,
* Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-23 18:07:50 +0100]:
> (BTW, these days every other major distribution offers ported apt-get
> or have some similar tool like urpmi. Do you think we should weaken
> the wording "most distinguishes" a bit?)
IMO the biggest feature that distinguishes dis
orrect it with a text editor, then (at least for the first ones)
> repost it there (if possible with a diff). For the first files, this
> will allow us to share points of view about some user input
> choices.
OK. Is "diff -u" the preferred format?
--
John !
Buttery! UNIX - The OS where you can throw the manual on the keyboard
www.io.c! and still get a valid command.
om/~john!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 22:26:42 -0500]:
> In almost all cases, d-i should just make the safe and correct default
> _be_ the default, instead of resorting to documenting it in the
> description. Maybe there are one or two exceptions.
I think that is the case (that the safe an
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 17:33:28 +0100]:
> (CC'ed just in case you aren't subscribed to -boot)
Don't you have to be subscribed to post? In any case, yes, I'm
subscribed.
> And, given your name, you're an english native spearker, aren't you?
Definitely. I'm also
Hello...I'm pretty much a rank newbie when it comes to contributing
to Debian, but I'd really like to give something back to the community.
Unfortunately I'm not a coder...but I have been told that I'm good at
explaining complicated concepts in simple terms, so if there's any need
for updates to
6 matches
Mail list logo
