snip
What do you mean by a TTY console during the installation?
Lowering the severity anyway as I don't think this is a bug (if one)
that affects all installs.
With all the install problems reports? I would certainly expect
having to open up a shell to fix things to install MORE THAN
i like anything that helps fresh meat install without hours of crap ! :)
personaly i wish you could add this in contributions as working with a particular version of
debian (an important aspect for dist. tars) and do so without allot of admin approval.
thanks all, -- John
Brian Potkin
hi i'm not a DM
yea but the script installs awk/mawk before any depends and it gets in
reguardless.
try not calling out awk as depends since that is pre-scripted (it's to get dpkg
running i think)
why force didn't work i'm unsure
Have Fun !
-- John
Adrian Ban wrote:
Package: debootstrap
It would be nice if it didnt Conflict: with debconf (debconf-2.0) because no one needs such problems
early in install.
Cant it run side-by-side debconf (ie, user can theoretically run either) ? It's easy to make side
by side apps but i know: sometimes not.
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting
Put code in a kernel but don't want kernel params, sysctl, /proc, or /sysfs to wake it? Instead
wishing modprobe will wake it ?? Sorry I interrupted :) - John
Unlike the modprobe utility from module-init-tools, busybox' version
fails for built-in modules:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I hate to say anything no knowing the full story. I was just installing.
The initrd.gz off netinst CD does has depmod. If you use it then your ext4 module loads right?
Without depmod you could edit the modules.dep et al files with nano and that should work too, if I
remember correctly.
I
How is alteration from .gz to .xz going to do anything but create new upgrade
or boot issues?
what bug number is it?
-
Is lzh/ma xz built already built-in (to kernel or glibs)? What if kernel or libs changes or isn't
yet installed? Use bin?
Won't this mean all
7 matches
Mail list logo
