> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:04:52AM +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
>> Hi all,
Hi
>> Add the mount option 'discard' for ext4 filesystems so, during
>> partitioning, TRIM can be activated for SSDs in the installed
>> system.
>
> I enabled that on ext4 on my SSD, and had two lockups in 24 hours.
>
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I tried the graphical install, it just hang.
So I continued with the non-graphical install.
After partitioning (choosing btrfs for all but the swap partition),
when installing the base system the root parti
On 08/20/2011 02:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
>> Package: task-file-server
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
>
>
> Committed.
Thanks.
> W
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.o
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
> Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
> with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
> Installer release process and it would b
On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Otavio
> During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to
> debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review
> and comments.
>
> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
> in
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.1
Severity: important
Hi
udpkg (the dpkg equivalent within d-i) does only support gziped tarballs. So it
does not support data.tar.bz2 and similar.
It would be good if there could be an autoreject for these to avoid broken
daily/weekly images and uninstallable ude
gelog
--- discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog
+++ discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+discover (2.1.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't ship .la files (Closes: #621193).
+
+ -- Luk Claes Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:31:15 +0200
+
discover (2.1.2-5) unstabl
On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
>>> They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
>>> Importa
On 10/31/2010 04:49 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Die Sep 14 06:55:28 +0200 2010:
>> Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
>>> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> - There are still some old builds. I'm still looking for someone to
> document the current autobu
o existing documentation or scripts driving this
>> process.
>
>
> Luk Claes has been the person setting this up on the buildds. So, I
> think having him in the loop is the best action. Luk?
The mips* buildds were changed, the promess was made to have the d-i
builds moving to th
On 08/21/2010 10:40 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>>
>>> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
>>> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently i
On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>
>> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
>> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were
>> asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to migrate netcfg
On 08/16/2010 05:21 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt, le Sat 14 Aug 2010 10:09:38 +0100, a écrit :
>> The icu transition is ready to go, but currently stalled by brllty which
>> is blocked because of its udeb.
>>
>> As I understand it, the udeb does not use icu
>
> It doesn't indeed.
>
Colin Watson wrote:
> Could parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 be unblocked, please? It's needed
> to smooth the path for parted 2.2 in the near future.
unblocked.
> Speaking of which, I would like to upload parted 2.2 to unstable (it's
> currently in experimental) once 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-6 reaches
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Frans,
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Saturday 30 January 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I built a netboot image without dhcp3-udeb to test udhcpc, but it
failed miserably as it did not manage to get a lease during netcfg.
H
Frans Pop wrote:
> Please force migration of wireless-tools to testing.
Unfortunately it's entangled with the KDE transition.
> We need to do another upload of debian-installer to fix an issue with
> syslinux menus on x86, but it FTBFS on amd64 because:
> The following packages have unmet depe
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on
>> my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We
>> did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all
>> confus
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2009, Debian testing watch wrote:
>> FYI: The status of the kbd-chooser source package
>> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>>
>> Previous version: 1.52
>> Current version: 1.53
>
> This means that lenny-support *must* also migrate before t
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-3 (udeb)
Not blocked, so no unblock needed.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Christian Perrier wrote:
> It looks like I completely zapped the fact that we had a planned
> meeting on Nov. 2nd.
>
> As a consequence, I forgot sending a reminder during the week-end and
> didn't show up on IRC at the right time...:-(
>
> And it thus seems that Otavio was mostly alone to be onl
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure
>> seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic)
>> and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank).
>
> For mips and mipsel there's a much
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Changes:
> libpng (1.2.40-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release
>
> Changes:
> pciutils (1:3.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-09-18 03:15:01
Both are not blocked anymore.
Cheers
Luk
--
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Although Linux 2.6.31 has been released, it has a number of known
> regressions and I think we will wait for 2.6.31.1 before uploading to
> unstable. Most of the kernel team will be meeting in Portland from
> 22-26 September and I would expect the first upload to be done aft
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp 5.1.83-1 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
> ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
> default, and has no changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 7 days without introducing new probl
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> tags 542113 +moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> * Adam D. Barratt [090817 23:39]:
>
>> Please remove atari-bootstrap from unstable. It only produces binary
>> packages for m68k so is redundant now that the architecture is no longer
>> in unstable.
>
> atarai-boot
David Vanfleet wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm trying to get Debian (Lenny) to recognize 6 Gig of memory on a
> Dell PE 2650 server. I installed the basic 5.02a Debian system with just
> a minimal install then I installed the 2.6.26-2-686-bigmem kernel so it
> will see all the memory. When I boot into the bigm
dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>> - Update kernel-wedge/stable to include bnx2x if available (are there
>>>> space issues here?)
>>> The space usage is neglitable and I think
J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We haven't had a properly installable stable release for a full month
> now, #536312. Applies to both CD/DVD and network installs. I don't see
> much activity to resolve this. Are we so busy with squeeze and sid, that
> we don't care about lenny any more?
FTP Mas
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello dann,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:04 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> The bnx2x driver was disabled in lenny due to its use of non-free
>> firmware. I have put together a patch that would reenable this driver
>> in lenny's 2.6.26 kernel, making use of the firmware split-
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
ltsp 5.1.77-1 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
default, and has no changes since the previous version.
it has been in unstable for 9 days without introducing new problems.
u
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
simple-cdd 0.3.11 is blocked from migrating to testing, as it contains the
simple-cdd-profiles udeb, which is not used by default in debian-installer. no
changes were made to the udeb since the version in testing.
no new issues have been reported, and has been in unstab
Christian Perrier wrote:
With our current schedulen, the next team meeting will happend on July
20th.
However, This day of the week is not convenient for Colin Watson, our
technical leader.
Would people object to us moving the meeting day to Tuesdays, Wednesdays
or Thursdays (same hour, that is
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009):
I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
fix for CVE-2009-0692
Y
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009):
I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
fix for CVE-2009-0692
You're supposed to mail -boot as well… (Doing so, adjusting subject.)
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> martin f krafft writes:
>
>> Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
>
> Ack
Already unblocked since May 26th ...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>> please unblock libtextwrap 0.1-8 pciutils 1:3.1.3-1 (both with udebs)
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>>
>>> libtextwrap (0.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
>>> .
>>> * Support
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Jurij Smakov writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:40:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> fontconfig has been waiting 21 days for migration, perhaps it should be
>>> unblocked? No RC bugs were filed during that time.
>> debian-boot, please approve, this is
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
>> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
>> of the kernel team...
>
> it
Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read
> from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation
> of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised.
>
> Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.3
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like vte can be migrated to testing. Unblocking it will allow 3
> other packages to immediately migrate too and in time, 5 more packages.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> console-setup is blocked due to its udebs. These udebs however are not
> yet used by the installer. The package has stayed about 40 days in
> unstable.
>
> Xserver-xorg from unstable depends on the version of console-setup in
> unstable. Because of this, in order to m
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been
> waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
>> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
>
> Yeah, binNMU ought to
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp 5.1.76-1 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
> ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
> default, and has no changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 8 days without introducing new probl
Hi
Can someone prepare a short summary of the changes in the next stable
point release that affect the Installer to include in the announcement?
At least the cdebconf improvements (especially important for Debian Edu)
and the choose-mirror changes (installing Etch with Lenny's installer)
are note
dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> we intend to do a Lenny Point Release on Saturday, June 20th. We will
>> clear stable NEW in the coming days and then declare the point release
>> frozen. Please hurry up if you still need somet
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Pascal,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
> Vandeputte wrote:
> [...]
>> # ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
>> initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 pvdpu
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk,
Hi Otavio
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Attached is a first try to support udhcpc in netcfg.
>
> Thank you very much by working on it.
>
>> I opted for dropping support for pump and the ISC dhcp clie
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
> And that it actually works?
> I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates
at that time, though as there are no CD i
dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 03:35:16PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for Debian Edu it would be great if cdebconf would be updated to 0.141 in
>>> stable and new d-i initrds would be build, as we
j++] = "-O";
+arguments[j++] = dhclient_request_extras[i];
+}
+
+if (dhostname) {
+arguments[j++] = "-H";
+arguments[j++] = dhostname;
+}
+ while(j < sizeof(arguments)/sizeof(char*)) {
+arguments[j++] =
Hi
Forwarding this announcement as it might directly affect your team.
Don't hesitate to forward it further if you think that can be useful.
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Upcoming Lenny Point Release
Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:25:12 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
martin f krafft wrote:
> ... has been in testing for 20 days. Should not affect d-i.
unblocked
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
> The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
> unblock them?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
> changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
Hi
There were some commits related to this AFAIR, though it's unclear what
the exact status is.
Is it time to start testing or are there still some issues left?
What's the next step that needs to be taken?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 14 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>> It would be great to get confirmation that automatic device detection
>> works. If you have relevant hardware, please give one of the daily
>> built images of the installer a try:
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>
> I
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Adeodato Simó (Wed, 13 May 2009 11:04:38 +0200):
>
>> Hello,
>
>> while trying to get an initial view of migrating KDE4 to testing with
>> britney, I noticed that our "taskel-meta-faux" package [1] was rendered
>> uninstallable because the kde-core metapackage is no longe
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> simple-cdd 0.3.10 is blocked from migrating to testing, as it contains the
> simple-cdd-profiles udeb, which is not used by default in debian-installer.
> no
> changes were made to the udeb since the version in testing.
>
> no new issues have been reported, it closes a
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-7 please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
Please let migrate eject/2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-6 to testing.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
* sarge-support
* vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)?
* sysconfig-writer
* linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
Can these safely be removed from the repository?
None of these should be removed.
The *only* one
Hi
I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being removal of
packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the official
archive anymore:
* sarge-support
* vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)?
* sysconfig-writer
* linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other
> things, the gnome-desktop transition.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:51:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello porters,
>>
>> Most arches has 2.6.29 packages ready (AFAIK only hppa lacks them
>> right now) and I also did most changes for all arches on SVN to get
>> 2.6.29 updating as easy as possible. Now, we ne
Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Since the iso's in
>
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
>
>
> still date from January, I assume that the new hardware for building
> powerpc packages hasn't been installed yet.
>
> If there an expected time of arriva
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
>
>>> The root user should not have an empty password. If you leave this
>>> empty, the root account will be disabled and the system's initial user
>>> account will be given the power to become root using the "sudo
>>> command.
>
Hi
Below is the change to the user-setup-udeb templates I intend to commit,
please review it.
Cheers
Luk
--- debian/user-setup-udeb.templates(revision 57747)
+++ debian/user-setup-udeb.templates(working copy)
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@
A good password will contain a mixture of letters, number
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:38:39PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Luk and Wouter,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell m
Luk Claes wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Jérémy pointed me to this outstanding issue, so I had a look...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:45 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:42:44AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I know that adding another question at high priority might not be
a
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
As you may know, I stopped the powerpc dailies about a month ago, due to
the fact that the machine on which they were running was a PowerMac
8500, an oldworld machine, that is no longer supported by recent
kernels; the kernel that it does run is now too old for the lib
Hi Wartan
You updated the powerpc build config for adding a CHRP boot structure on
ISO images [1]. Though when trying to build images, it doesn't find the
bootinfo.txt, where should it come from?
Cheers
Luk
[1]
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/trunk/installer/build/config/powerpc.cfg?r1=55119&
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Adeodato Simó (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:58 +0200):
>
>> * put oldsys-preseed 3.2lenny1 udeb in lenny, replacing 3.2?
>
>> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING
>> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS.
>
>> * drop the *-2.6.26-1-* kernel and
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette :
>> Hi,
>>
>> atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the
>> moment. Would it be possible to unblock it?
>>
>> BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the
>> rules for udeb migration could be
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please accept beep to transition to testing. It is mostly only a
> translation and cosmetic update, no code changes involved. For your
> convenience, here's the changelog:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Official events have to be submitted in the Pentabarf interface before
>> Wednesday if I'm not mistaken.
>>
>> Would it be ok if I submit D-I Work Sessions for du
Hi
Official events have to be submitted in the Pentabarf interface before
Wednesday if I'm not mistaken.
Would it be ok if I submit D-I Work Sessions for during DebCamp? How
long and how many do we want in that case?
Does someone want to give a D-I talk during DebConf to explain how it
all works
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>
>>> What about "Every 1st and 3rd Monday of each month" ? This will
>>> obviously make a 3 week delay sometimes but that would be the price to
>>> pay to simplicity.
>> This works nice and also keeps it simple enough.
Mark Brown wrote:
> Please consider zlib for migration to testing, it has been in unstable
> for quite some time and contains only one very small change:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING
>> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS.
* remove the arm kernel and module packages again from unstable/testing.
Cheers
luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Davide Viti wrote:
> Hi,
> please allow current ttf-dejavu (2.29-2) into testing.
> It contains a couple of udebs.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
There is a problem with the dak code for oldstable point releases. Joerg
is fixing it atm.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
> changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
>
> It fixes a security issue.
>
> It has a udeb.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
>
>>> Improve udeb migration
>>> --
>>> The release team is working on a migration script which, among other
>>> tasks, will implement dedicated features for udeb migra
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>> It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
>>>> nonsense.
>>> No thanks. I see no rea
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
>> nonsense.
>
> No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort.
Please stop that hostility.
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lis
ter many discussions about various ways to take some load
> out of the RM shoulders, we settled on an organization where Otavio
> Salvador keeps working as D-I release manager, with some assistance
> during the release preparations:
> - Christian Perrier for "all boring and tedio
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-6 please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unblocked
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> freetype 2.3.9-4 is ready to go into testing, but it includes a udeb.
> debian-boot, is this ok to update?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm sure it will suprise no one when I say that the "d-i lab" automatic
test stuff I used to do
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
>> Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>>> Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
>>> less up-to-date status of the preparations.
>> The installer team
Hi
The upcoming point releases for both Etch and Lenny are planned for
April 4th.
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
Security updates that are complete could still make it till after March
28th, though this has to b
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
