Package: libdebian-installer
Version: 0.110
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu cosmic ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
it appears that libdebian-installer fails to build in our latest rebuild tests
with GCC 7 -- implicit-fallthrough warning / err
my solution is complex but I was not able to find a
> simpler one that works well enough with my test case:
> language=fr_FR long?='1 2 3' rescue/enable="true" my/description="un message"
> --- quiet
Yeah, I didn't have one of those in my test case. Oops.
. With my limited testing it seemed to work well,
and would be less complex than your solution ;)
Did I miss some important corner-case?
--
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
y to have a look.
As for hurd, /proc/cmdline also exists and includes all the parameters I
add using 'set options='.
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
but I want to make the solution available
in Debian as well... Anybody have a preference?
Kindly,
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre >
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hendrik Brueckner (2015-11-30):
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > An update in the multipath-tools, [1], changed the naming scheme for
> > mpath aliases created when the user friendly names option is specified.
> >
> > The alias namin
Package: libdebian-installer
Version: 0.102
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu yakkety ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
EFI detection in libd-i can in some cases pass while efibootmgr will fail to
set BootEntry due to efivar's checks actually loo
anged since.
--
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
feedback on the code branch, then I'd be happy to merge it to master
(but I would still need someone to sponsor the upload).
Kindly,
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1
signatur
se at [2].
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/hw-detect.git/commit/?h=people/cyphermox/mpath-detect
[2]
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/partman-base.git/log/?h=people/cyphermox/multipath5
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/DC95CA5A 36E2 CF22 B077 FEFE 725C 80D3 C7DA A946 DC95 CA5A
On Aug 22, 2015 7:16 PM, "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 07:20:53AM +0200, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:40:32 -0300
> > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > And having get.debian.org as canonical maybe? But indeed I like the
idea.
> >
>
three should land together; the idea is to "normalize" on mpathXpY
paths for the multipath devices while in d-i so that both parted-created
partitions and partitions reused show up with the same names so as not
to confuse other bits of the installer.
--
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Free
y initial focus will be
patches for multipath support that don't appear to have associated BTS
bugs. Is it fine to push to git for code to be reviewed (in my own
people/cyphermox-guest/xyz branch), or should I file bugs and attach
patches?
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber:
ernel: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>From c717f8418513a268c708b496dccb80422a385eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Date:
14 matches
Mail list logo
