Feel free to push/upload as you see fit; thanks.
Thanks, I will do that.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
u should be able to log in.
Maybe a better feature for the installer, would be if it asked you for
an SSH key for the default user (or for the root user)?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags -1 + patch
thanks
From 03477bf089926f7a599bbe89f67df53080b69bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:12:35 +
Subject: [PATCH] preprocess: If source directory is a symlink, follow it
Closes: #955210
---
commands/preprocess | 9 +
debian
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.102
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
kfreebsd-10 FTBFS, due to probably this change in kernel-wedge:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/kernel-wedge/-/commit/3827f1ee9f53540b104c592a8a2695f78d8629ed
The kfreebsd-10 build proc
y sad, but makes me think it merits working around (or preemptive
action in the case of Debian), even at the expense of 256MB disk space.
So in recipes-amd64-efi, is it feasible we double the max. size of /boot
from 256MB to 512MB?
"640K ought to be enough for everyone."
Thanks for c
sonal interactions beyond that, is just too
much. That is the real "debacle"; it is not surprising to me now, that
this did not happen yet in 10 years, or that no enthusiastic new
contributor had already done this.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Descr
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:00:01PM +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > That differs from the latest version of my patch, and from what I sent
> > earlier today to the release team when asking about a potential unblock:
> > https://lists.debian.org/d
ebian.org/debian-release/2017/02/msg01033.html
I think we should wait for them to answer before doing anything else.
Based on KiBi's feedback I thought it better to swap sum[0] and sum[1],
and remove the SHA1 parsing also.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Descri
u anna-1.57/debian/changelog anna-1.58/debian/changelog
--- anna-1.57/debian/changelog 2017-02-13 06:08:47.0 +
+++ anna-1.58/debian/changelog 2017-02-28 16:41:04.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+anna (1.58) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Replace md5sum verification with sha
Updated patch, which assumes the libdebian-installer4-dev package will
not be renamed. Build-Depend on a recent enough version that provides
sha256 fields.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d6682ca..20e33a0 100644
--- a
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> replace sum[0] with sha256 and leave sum[1] empty;
> [...] (we would drop the MD5- and SHA1-parsing code
> and make absolutely sure nobody is still using those).
The new patch attached would do that, and it remains otherwise
ABI-compatible.
It aims to be
Thanks for your comments!
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2017-02-27):
> > (If we really wanted, we could maybe avoid the ABI bump: [...]
>
> Given the number of reverse dependencies, I doubt this is worth abusing
> md5 storage for sha256 things.
Maybe I should
which remains the same length). The
dynamically-sized buffer it points to, would change from storing an MD5
to a SHA256 hash, and would only cause a regression where something is
still trying to validate MD5).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
ncrease it if changing SHA256 to SHA512 in the future. A
more thorough rework of this code might store the hash type (as an enum)
and length, in the di_package struct instead.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Attached is [...]
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/anna.c b/anna.c
index 4b68816..e03d34a 100644
--- a/anna.c
+++ b/anna.c
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ install_modules(di_packages *status, di_packages *packages) {
}
}
-
entation needed
to change then.
In the ideal world, the code itself would be the clear, authoritative
reference of what it is doing. I wish that we can remove all references
to md5 and sha1 there.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hed log.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
/usr/bin/sha256sum /tmp/net-retriever-1817-Packages
/usr/bin/sha256sum /tmp/net-retriever-1872-Packages
/usr/bin/sha256sum /tmp/net-retriever-1872-Packages
/usr/bin/sha256sum /tmp/net-retriever-1872-Packages
/usr/bin/md5sum /var/cache/a
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> This change breaks the existing ABI and therefor needs an ABI bump, but
> it is missing from the patch.
I agree, that should be done. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
might have avoided #856213).
I think archive utils have had plenty of time (10 years!) to add SHA256
fields, so it is reasonable now to require a SHA256 field be present,
and validate only that?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t use
the md5sums field, and the struct size is not changing); though if they
do use, I'd prefer they FTBFS so that we find out.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nd the testsuite to check parsing of the
SHA256 fields; that also would result in a larger diff however.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 3dd29e1..1b7fcd8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,7 +1,16 @@
l
until 2022. So
I'm tentatively filing this bug as RC-severity.
Further context and an overview of related bugs will be published at:
https://wiki.debian.org/InstallerDebacle
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lerDebacle
This bug is not itself RC, but it will be a blocking issue for RC bugs
I'm about to file.
I intend to submit a patch for this shortly.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
feq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),kfreebsd-amd64)
# See Bug#783773 for derivation.
-MFSROOT_LIMIT := 74m
+MFSROOT_LIMIT := 78m
endif
define mkfs.ufs1
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I have uploaded debian-installer/20150422+kbsd8u2+deb8u4 [...]
That has been superseded already by 20150422+kbsd8u3, which seems to
have already been processed through BYHAND, perhaps automatically.
You may wish to remove 20150422+kbsd8u2+deb8u4 from the BYH
rball, I can try out
this patch (3.0 native and .tar.xz) with that to begin with.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.1-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE= (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>From d74e62562b5814a496ff485c4ba4f6bbfa542a50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:47:0
r' as appropriate?
I think the destination suite is stable-kfreebsd-proposed-updates:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable-kfreebsd-proposed-updates/main/installer-kfreebsd-amd64/
Possibly the source suite is also stable-kfreebsd-proposed-updates?
Many thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chambe
we don't actually need /sbin/init for those, so
this change is probably an improvement)..
Thanks for heads-up.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sie-kfreebsd-proposed-updates suite.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tal')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.1-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>From 93af24652f09144720d730a8de7f0e5e574c9947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain
Date: Sun, 17 Apr
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I've noticed kfreebsd-* are lacking d-i daily builds. Looking on the
> > porterboxes for both archs, the issue is the following:
> There were many things broken by [new glibc] in sid, kfreebsd-i386
> especially.
ke after the glibc/2.22-1 upload.
There were many things broken by this in sid, kfreebsd-i386 especially.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. The
required functionality is provided by makefs 20100306-6, now in
sid+stretch.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
using devices.tar.gz; even for more exotic use
cases like BSD jails. hurd appears to have something equivalent.
Thanks for letting us know.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ATE_EPOCH to a dummy value ("now") if
undefined (since ../debian/changelog may not exist), which we need
when calling makefs from within that Makefile. We export it for use by
gen-tarball to avoid duplication there.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tamps
I expect that Linux d-i builds will have some reproducibility issues
in whatever generates the initrd or ISOs, but I may look into that after
the jessie-kfreebsd release is done.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sechangelog -SDate) to set
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH there would only work when building from the toplevel
> directory, and not from the build/ subdirectory for example. ]
If it's anyway not going to be reproducible, we could similarly fall
back to a SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ?= now; or the caller could choose to
provide them.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Attached is my jessie-kfreebsd implementation. As I said, it should be
much cleaner to implement this in sid with newer GNU tar.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/build/Makefile b/build/Makefile
index ec5a084..6261a4d 100644
--- a/build/Makefile
+++ b/build/Makefile
least. :)
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ngs in anna anyway, and you'd need to know all
the available udeb versions at that point. It can also be verbose
about how it makes the choice.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: anna
Version: 1.52
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Control: block 345408 by -1
Hi,
If we had multiple udeb sources (Bug#345419), it could mean that
anna reads a Packages file having multiple versions for some udebs.
It's very easy to make net-retriever generate such a file, combining
mult
, and that's good enough to do some basic testing.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s
of stable isn't as interesting, as being able to find bugs *before* they
are introduced in a point release.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Next, it would be nice to test that the base system in stable-p-u is
> still installable. d-i's debootstrap can't seem to do this as it
> doesn't recognise "-proposed-updates" suites, so would need a patch to
> add those. I tri
Package: partman-zfs
Version: 45
Severity: important
Tags: pending
Hi,
partman-zfs recently stopped setting a mountpoint, for filesystems
other than the root. They are mounted to /target, but not mounted
at first boot of the installed system.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
and sid. This preseeds to
install XFCE:
tasksel tasksel/first multiselect standard, xfce-desktop
whereas this (traditional way) no longer does anything, and you would
still get GNOME or whatever is default:
tasksel tasksel/desktop multiselect xfce
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste.
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.67
Severity: important
Tags: patch pending
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
debootstrap in wheezy and sid doesn't know the new jessie-kfreebsd
suite, which prevents the installer or standalone debootstraps from
installing it.
The jessie-k
ch got pushed to master w/o updating the
> (specific) version number. Feel free to adjust it before uploading.
Yes, sorry; that's exactly what I did. Thanks Christian.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o Git master.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150430115243.gf57...@pyro.eu.org
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Reducing MFSROOT size very slightly allows the kfreebsd-amd64 installer
> to work again on systems with 144 MiB total memory.
... should have read "160 MiB" total memory.
Patch can be found at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/
Patch can be found at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/rootskel.git/commit/?h=jessie-kfreebsd
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Reducing MFSROOT size very slightly allows the kfreebsd-amd64 installer
> to work again on systems with 144 MiB total memory.
... should have read "160 MiB" total memory.
Patch can be found at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20150422
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
To follow shortly are some patches in the jessie-kfreebsd branch that
should be applicable to sid also.
Reducing MFSROOT size very slightly allows the kfreebsd-amd64 installer
to work again on systems with 144 MiB total me
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2015-04-27):
> > + if (strncmp(line, "Architectures:", 14) == 0)
> > + release->archs = strdup(buf);
>
> I think you're missing some free
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.62
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: jessie kfreebsd
Hi,
When installing kfreebsd or hurd in Expert mode, choose-mirror offers to
install "jessie - stable" and "stretch - testing" even though the
architecture being install
merge.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ll have a jessie-kfreebsd suite, where we patch this
package to do exactly that.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lots of testing I wanted to do (incl. of CD images).
Given how busy I am at the moment, I couldn't do that in time for the
official release.
Would it be reasonable and practical - even preferable - to postpone
release of kfreebsd until at least 1-2 weeks after the official release?
T
all of these. For kfreebsd, the unblock is still needed.
Please feel free to unblock, it has security fixes only.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
after installing.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150309133403.gb21...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
;optimised out'. Awkwardly though, variables
stay in scope until the end of this long script, and it's hard to see if
something gets (re-)used later. findfs gets used in some more places
and I'm not sure yet if it's satisfactory in *all* places to to consider
only the first on
a dak dm
authorisation for that.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
From bd30e842861d39b66936716e84dd34c799a69b10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:11:58 +
Subject: [PATCH] Only enable the zpool features GRUB 2.02 supports (C
a, even if you don't set compression=on for a dataset). So I
suggest we use "-d" but still enable lz4 and all read-only compatible
features. (`zpool create` without "-d" would enable *all* features by
default).
Thanks for reporting this!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > No objection on my side, but let's give BSD folks a heads-up since
> > isc-dhcp-client-udeb depends on bind9's udebs.
>
> Thanks, the changes seem to only relate to authoritative DNS zones
> though. No for
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> No objection on my side, but let's give BSD folks a heads-up since
> isc-dhcp-client-udeb depends on bind9's udebs.
Thanks, the changes seem to only relate to authoritative DNS zones
though. No foreseeable impact on ISC DHCP or d-i.
Regards
--
Steven
ntinues to refresh the
lease - and starting in the jessie version, will also give up the lease
on SIGINT (that was #757711).
I think reverting to what we had before reintroduces bugs, and would
break downstream Ubuntu. I think a workaround should be more
targetted at udhcpc/dhcp6c.
Regards,
--
cfg dialogs.
Maybe there is still a better solution?
Or perhaps we could add something that kills *only* udhcpc/dhcp6c, could
clearly annotate it as "this is a workaround for bug #768188". Then it
shouldn't affect Ubuntu, or derivatives/ports using ISC DHCP at all.
And if
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff -Nru kfreebsd-10-10.1~svn274115/debian/changelog
kfreebsd-10-10.1~svn274115/debian/changelog
--- kfreebsd-10-10.1~svn274115/debian/changelog 2014-12-28 11:41:23.0
+
+++ kfreebsd-10-10.1~svn274115/debian/changelog 2015-01-28
Since this is a kfreebsd-any package, and we're not part of the
official stable release, I have to lower this to non-RC severity.
We should still fix it for the GNU/kFreeBSD release though.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-re
efault to using
"-d" (disabling new features including LZ4 metadata compression).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
re d-i gets uploaded. I almost
> asked but decided to try and skip some more back and forth. Let's do that
> now anyway, then. :)
Yes I'm fine with this, thanks.
(There's a reason I didn't ask for unblocks sooner but that's a long
story and unrelated to d-i
d doesn't materialise for whatever reason,
please feel free to go with the above. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
Package: src:tasksel
Version: 3.29
Severity: important
Hi,
(this bug may also affect linux release architectures other than
i386|amd64|powerpc*, and their CD media, so severity may be higher)
It was seen on kfreebsd and hurd that preseeding with:
tasksel tasksel/first multiselect standard, des
s.debian.net/view/g-i-installation/job/g-i-installation_debian_jessie_xfce/65/artifact/results//snapshot_003706.png
* we seemed to get gnome3, despite preseed file asking for xfce:
> tasksel tasksel/first multiselect standard, desktop
> tasksel tasksel/desktop multiselect xfce
Thanks,
Regards,
st of the
alternatives is considered. I'm not sure whether it skips over
the missing ones on that arch, or would fail with BD-Uninstallable.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
ked.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/10/msg00445.html
| Apart from that, the grub install step was not able to find the
| disk/partition by default, so I had to specify it in the prompt as
| '/dev/xbd0'.
And the rather simple change is attached. Not sure what to do.
Tha
early to decide this yet. I know
that systemd will have a DHCP client - d-i doesn't currently use
systemd, but who knows what could happen in 2 years; we also don't know
yet if there'll be a kfreebsd in jessie+1 officially
So I think we might come back to this a while after jess
er should support at least *some* nVidia cards, perhaps older
and not integrated chipsets. I've started a Wiki page where we can
start to collect data on this:
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Hardware#Graphics_cards
The vesa fallback should be good enough for at least some uses.
On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes.
After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working
well now in sid d-i. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.
-Using:
kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9, so UDD lists their bugs in the RC bug views
although they're not really issues for jessie.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s a
symlink anyway and I've used that with various TFTP servers in the past.
> Afaik, the tftp servers are not involved here, we're talking about the
> layout on mirrors.
Because netboot.tar.gz is also what people deploy on TFTP servers for
PXE booting.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bitmap. But I can mount the VFAT filesystem of an USB stick
> Still no clue why ntfs-3g has problems reading another NTFS bitmap again.
NTFS is working for me with the latest fuse4bsd package in sid; you
may have to `kldload fuse` if it is not loaded already. (Perhaps
another issue f
Package: isc-dhcp-client-udeb
Version: 4.3.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, herbert.kamin...@gmx.de
On 01:41, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> > Image:
> > http://cdi
> XTerm was unsuccessful.
In what way; what exactly does it do? What about sudo instead?
> All the other problems from the reports #762401
I'll follow up on those to that bug log instead.
> #762590 are still there,
That's a linux-amd64 issue though I think.
Regar
for
the individual packages you use, determine potential impact/severity in
your situation (if any) :
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldstable
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rather important issue for tasksel 'standard' task,
and can be satisfactorily addressed there, if gnupg2 adjusts its
dependencies also.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=yes
-o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes
Perhaps look up those tasks on http://packages.debian.org and check
installability of task-xfce-desktop in particular, maybe using the
edos-distcheck tool or reviewing https://qa.debian.org/dose/
I'll probably check on this
On 09/10/14 11:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 09/10/14 07:44, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> * When creating new zpools, disable optional features including
>> lz4_compress, because that will require grub-pc >> 2.02~, which is
>> in sid but not j
tra
functionality for that use case. (Also curious, what will gnupg2 do if
only pinentry-gtk2 is installed but no desktop is running?)
I'm not saying it's gnupg-agent's fault this situation occurred, but it
is IMHO a serious enough problem affecting d-i/tasksel, to need to fi
not jessie yet. (Closes: #764287)
> Please revert this after grub-pc >> 2.02~ migrates.
> * Bump zfsutils dependency to upstream version 9.2 or later, with
> support for the zpool create -d flag required for the above
Yes, please upload that for me; thank you!
Regards,
--
loaded. I guess os-prober loads it
in order to scan for ntfs partitions, and that's good. Someone said
that feature wasn't working, but seems like it may start to work as soon
as fuse4bsd/0.3.9~pre1.20080208-9 migrates (of already if installing the
sid distribution). Needs to be tes
On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat
> > easy for porters to test?
>
> I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image
> from them myself. But doin
rom them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it
meanwhile, so I'm okay with it.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
me, or is that choice only shown for Expert-mode installs?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.26-2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hi,
Installing a sid system from d-i Beta 2 (kfreebsd-amd64, but probably
also Linux), tasksel task 'standard' brings in many unwanted
dependencies via:
mutt -> libgpgme11 -> gnupg2 -> gnupg-agent -> pinentry-gtk2 -> ...
I suggest ma
Package: partman-zfs
Version: 39
Severity: critical
Tags: pending
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
If d-i is running kfreebsd 10.1, lz4 will be active by default for
newly-created ZFS pools. GRUB 2.02 (in sid) can boot from these,
but GRUB 2.00 (in jessie) cannot.
So, in
ng stable, or already fixed by wheezy-sec upload)
I think that leaves us with only three unpatched RC bugs affecting
jessie: #740509, #734451, #761418
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
in this short timeframe, but I hope
we can try again for Beta 3.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141001133804.gb5...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
1 - 100 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
