On Jun 3, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * ty...@mit.edu [2010-06-03 09:57]:
>>> Bug#583592: shlibs.local tricks generate wrong dependency on libblkid1
>>> Bug#583551: debian-installer: mkfs.ext3 fails to run
>>> Forcibly Merged 583551 583592.
>>
>> People seem to be hitting this
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Looking at the diff between the Lenny and Sid versions, I wonder at the
> dropped build dependencies on libdevmapper/libselinux1.
>
>From the release notes:
The blkid library is now much more efficiently handling devicemapper
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:32:23PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15 15:23]:
> > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080814 10:52]:
> > > We have to set FSCKFIX=yes in /etc/default/rcS on machines that don't
> > > have any I/O devices to follow
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:05:21PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> I have a dual boot system, one is always stable and the other is used to
> try out things. The bootloader is grub from stable (i.e. 0.97-27etch1).
> I installed Lenny-Beta2 in my try-out-system without overwriting the
> bootloa
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late
> > date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a
> > temporary
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >
> > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is
> > > the first version to have ext4 support.
>
> Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev s
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:10:33AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We synchronize the udeb binaries of testing with unstable. When the
> packages goes to testing the udeb doesn't go automaticaly and it need
> to be done by a ftpmaster (Jeroen is who usually does it for us).
>
> If you update the u
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:31:50PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> > I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
> > from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
> > believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
> > ver
Hi,
I wasn't the one who requested that e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 get migrated
from unstable to testing. So hopefully you guys were expecting it; I
believe you had requested that I coordinate with you before new
versions of e2fsprogs hit testing, so there wouldn't be as many issues
with the debian insta
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:41:55AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Oh, I heard a rumor this package is having trouble building in
> non-i386 arches. Hopefully you can look at addressing that quickly,
> because I can't really adopt this package in boot-floppies until it's
> built for all arches.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:33:48PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> As for the packaging of those libs and of the binaries that were
> reduced, I'm not sure what would be best. IIRC most stuff included in
> boot-floppies is taken right from real packages installed on the
> machine where they are bu
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:27:57PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >Isn't PIC used for a reason in shared libs? :)
>
> Sure it is, but that reason doesn't really apply here.
>
> The reason we compile shared libraries as PIC is so that many
> applications can map the same object at different addr
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:22:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:49:54AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > As long as they don't care about needing debugfs, they can probably
> > > save 12k, maybe as much as 15k. How desperate fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
