Re: Still no base tarball

2001-08-20 Thread Vince Mulhollon
On 08/20/2001 03:34:19 PM Shaul Karl wrote: >> > Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > > What if I bought the CDs and now I want to `ship it' to my other 1 or 2 home >> > > machines, which doesn't have a CDROM drive and need installing base via >> > > floppies? >> > >> > Then, obvious

Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities

2001-05-15 Thread Vince Mulhollon
On 05/15/2001 09:28:37 AM tfheen wrote: >> You are assuming that talkd have buffer overflows, but you have no >> proof of it. And talk is rwxr-xr-x, so what would you win by an >> overflow on a local host? And I doubt that there are many bugs in a >> daemon which is less than 10k big. Perhaps

Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities

2001-05-15 Thread Vince Mulhollon
On 05/15/2001 08:00:09 AM exa wrote: >> What about closing all the ports by default? The user can open them by >> himself if he wants to anyway. Security fans would really be happy then. Still have the vulnerable, exploitable binaries. All you have to do it get root and open the "talkd" ports