Subject: installation-reports: d630
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
(sorry for lack of logs, sending from different machine)
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method:
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_alpha1/i386/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-a1-i386-netinst.iso
Extracting base-files...
local...@chalon:~$ echo $?
2
--
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/
> On Monday 31 August 2009, Yann Dirson wrote:
>> This seems to be similar to #480533, which was apparently fixed by
>> moving more stuff to perl-base.
>
> I very much doubt it is related as the version of perl that fixed #480533
> is ancient (included in stable). So if
This seems to be similar to #480533, which was apparently fixed by moving
more stuff to perl-base.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:30:10PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:50:31PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> >
> > I use ctrl:nocaps since ages, and only now (upgrading from 1.36) does
> > console-setup start to complain about it.
>
> What do you m
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.44
Severity: normal
I use ctrl:nocaps since ages, and only now (upgrading from 1.36) does
console-setup start to complain about it. I could not find a reason
for this from a quick search in the changelog. I just hope it will
continue to work in X despite console
I created
(which could have been a reasonable suggestion), whereas it was
telling me something different - see above.
> > - Selecting "French" as the keyboard layout after reboot, I do not
> > have time to see the keymap name, and subsequent error message, before
> > t
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:35:25AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:00:41AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > When asking questions to create the non-root user, the question for the
> > user's name appears before the explanation saying that a non-root user
this (obvious ?) choice, I'm
asked questions at medium priority, give default answer to all, and I'm then
left back to main menu, with next step selected (so I assume this time it
had worked).
This may be an exim4 bug instead, you know better :)
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on is
about the name of the root user.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Développeur Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040331
Tags: d-i
One of the last boxes says "Terminer l'installation", while it would much
probably be "Fin de l'installation" or "Finalisation de l'installation".
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:53:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Yann Dirson wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Version: 20040331
> > Tags: d-i
>
> Since you know the package is partman, please file the bug report on
> partman.
Hm, I should have checked further re
mediumso this is indeed tricky as trying to go
> back to main-menu with priority=high will never display the menu..:-)
What about giving it a high priority, but ensuring it is not in the direct
path for normal install ?
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill riche
, being careful not to hit any
"back" button, and when I asked for autopartitionning, I don't remember
seing a different dialog than the 1st time. But it's easily reproduceable:
- install qemu
- dd if=/dev/zero of=hda count=409600
- make sure you have TUN/TAP available to your ho
delete the partition, things proceed as expected.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
ht
to start qemu in such a way that it has a network
interface, even if it's not connected to a usable network, to go further.
This will be annoying to install on some embedded systems such as PDAs.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040331
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
If I enter an IP ending with .1, the suggested IPs for gw and ns end up
being the same as the machine's IP. Surely not accurate to the gateway.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill rich
is not enough space.
This in itself look suspect.
And below that I get 2 buttons : "back" and "continue". In what are those
supposed to be different ? Reminds me of the old Windows dialog proposing
"OK" and "Cancel" when a fatal error occured - no offe
what I want.
IMHO it would be much more consistent and intuitive to get rid of this
"automatically partition the HD" item, and rely on "back" for this feature.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[E
n the installer goes on
autodetecting hardware, including attempts to load vesafb and friends.
Whenever I try another _network_ driver I have to wait for the installer to
redo the same unrelated probing again.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
obably have seen it when hitting "back" (which would have been
highly counter-intuitive as well).
> Thus, you were on main menu at medium priority.
>
> Choosing back lowered the priority again.and you end up with
> installing at "low" priority and be prompted
experience of the average
user who just hit enter at the boot prompt...
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power,
about keyboard type (AT vs.
USB).
When I select AT I now get the list I was expecting. If now I hit "back"
again I (presumably correctly) get the AT vs. USB list.
Those 2 issues seem closely related.
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer
e OK again...
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian develo
about that, assuming most people agree with this ?
Requesting priorities to be raised in the override file ? Or is there
some d-i-specific action to be done ?
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerRespon
-pc" I get the same error messages.
- When asked to select (again) an http mirror for downloading
packages, 1) my previous selection is not the default, maybe because
of 2) the country names being listed in english, despite all other
text being correctly in french. However, the proxy
(eg. "/", which then causes an error because of
duplicate / being found)
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consult
bug main-menu[227]: DEBUG: Menu item
'di-utils-partitioner' selected
Jan 12 13:02:25 (none) user.debug main-menu[227]: DEBUG: configure
di-utils-partitioner, status: 2
Jan 12 13:02:25 (none) user.warn main-menu[227]: WARNING **: Unable to set title for
di-utils-partitioner.
HTH,
--
Y
but that was
just because its build procedure explicitely tested for it and used it
if available. And the current /bin/mount I have on another sarge box
does not have this symbol.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support manager
uss the issue first with the lintian maintainer and the bf
team ?
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, G
have much time tonight, will try to test things tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stabil
386
Kernel: Linux vitel 2.4.19-station #1 Tue Aug 6 11:36:58 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant
27;t the 3rd be
"autre choix 2" ?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vitel 2.4.19-station #1 Tue Aug 6 11:36:58 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Tech
another way. Yet I don't see how
it could get done properly within debconf otherwise.
What I'd suggest would be first to check with Joey Hess his opinions on the
subject - I know he would be of valuable help if convinced - before going
another way.
Opinions, anyone ?
--
Yann Dirson&l
Hi,
Looks like the pcmcia_core module is missing from the woody installer ?
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant
ebuild (delo dump
gnome-utils mc quik silo).
IMHO, that'd be possible to achieve.
Green light ? Red light ?
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software EngineerIngénieur Logiciel-Libre
Free-Software time
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:01:12PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So I suppose it won't be OK, then... better provide an alternative
> > package ?
>
> Better to not provide an alternative.
Woops, wrong wording :) Sure !
Replaces/Conflicts/Provides
--
Yann D
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:07:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:39:25AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > e2fsprogs 1.26 is out, including fixes for one but tagged important,
> > ext3-related fixes, reiserfs support in fsck, and more complete
> > suppo
it would probably be
better if it could go in base... What do boot-floppies and release
manager think ?
Full list of changes at
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=73260
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:41:55AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Unless you have objections, I'll build e2fsprogs-bf with -Os.
> > Probably many other packages would benefit from this flag as well...
>
> Sounds goo
hey,
their symlinks, and their dir tree take on my 4k-blocks filesystem,
but clearly there are a couple of KBs to take here.
Unless you have objections, I'll build e2fsprogs-bf with -Os.
Probably many other packages would benefit from this flag as well...
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PR
I think of it, e2fsprogs is Essential, so it
can't be replaced by non-Essential e2fsprogs-bf, so life is cool.
Will do that.
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
some
tweeking so that the bf package does not get built and uploaded into
the dist, but it may be worth it.
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
laced with rules that do a separate build in a second
> directory using the --disable-swapfs, --disable-debugfs, et. al. flags.
You might as well remove the refs to *pic from the control and rules
files, or the build will fail because of the missing pic targets in
the Makefile's.
Regards,
--
ork.
Anyway the only breakage that can arise here by using the reduced libs
will be an undefined symbol when a non-supported program will start,
right ? My understanding of how the shared libs work lets me think
there should not be other problems, but well...
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECT
[CCing the boot-floppies team]
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:49:54AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:24:54AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I've added support for pic libraries to the elf-lib Makefile, on
> > request of the boot-floopies
ake a difference to
put .o files where libtool is not in use :)
For e2fsprogs the minimal patch will be in upstream sources - you guys
will tell me if the saving are worth sending the change upstream.
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
way
of doing things, or does each package make its own cooking ? Eg,
glibc has some other files in addition to the pic lib...
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
om the bios at boot-time - that's why I put /boot at the beginning of the
drive, anyway.
And yes, it's really feasible. I installed at least 3 potato boxes with
this setup, with each time this quite annoying choice: install lilo either
in the mbr, or in a place where it won't be able
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A; potato RC3
Severity: normal
I did an install from my RC3 floppies this week - still do not have r1 CDs,
waiting for r2 to be there :} - and went into the following problem. It was
not a blocking problem for me, but I guess it may be to others.
Partionning:
/
otential
dependancy issues. Maybe I'll find some time to do this - but maybe not ;)
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Ch
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.16
Severity: normal
Another small issue I had was that after a first pass at installing
packages, apt told me it had problems unpacking some packages, and that
it could not install or configure (was not clear, but I'd say it was a
configuration problem, as only
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.16
Severity: normal
Just had my first install of potato TC3. No major problems. The main
one was that xdm did not start at the end of the install procedure - I was
left at the consoel prompt. The xdm package (and X server) was properly
configured, and xdm st
53 matches
Mail list logo
